the epoch times

Federal court temporarily restricts Idaho’s near-total abortion ban.

A federal appeals court on Tuesday temporarily limited ⁤Idaho’s near-total abortion ban ‍during ongoing legal ⁣proceedings involving a challenge from the Biden ⁣administration.

Last ‍month, a three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based‍ 9th U.S.⁣ Circuit Court of Appeals had⁢ allowed the state ⁤to enforce its ban.

However, the court ​has⁤ now chosen to hear the case “en banc,” or with a full panel of ⁤judges. This decision has temporarily halted the enforcement of the abortion ban in medical emergencies.

“Upon the vote of a⁤ majority ⁤of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this matter⁣ be ‌reheard en banc,”‍ the order stated.

In ⁢August last year, the Biden administration sued Idaho, arguing that the state’s ban contradicted the ‍Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), a federal law ‌mandating that hospitals must ‌”stabilize”​ patients facing emergency medical conditions.

The administration contended that the EMTALA could⁢ necessitate abortions beyond those covered ⁢by Idaho’s limited exception,⁣ designed to save the mother’s life.

U.S. District⁣ Judge James Wesley Hendrix⁤ concurred, issuing an order that prevented the law’s‍ enforcement in cases where abortions were necessary to prevent “serious jeopardy”⁤ to the‍ patient’s health ‍or the risk of “serious impairment to bodily ⁢functions.”

However, a three-judge panel reversed this​ decision last ⁤month, asserting ⁣that there ‌was no⁢ inherent conflict between Idaho’s abortion ban and the EMTALA, emphasizing that ⁢the EMTALA “does ‌not ​set standards ⁢of care or specifically mandate that certain procedures, such as abortion,⁣ be⁢ offered.”

The panel also noted that any potential conflict had been ​resolved by subsequent⁤ actions in the ‍state, including legislative and state Supreme Court clarifications of the​ law.

The ‌three‍ judges on⁣ last month’s panel​ were all appointed‌ by former President Donald Trump, ⁣a Republican. The 9th Circuit currently comprises 28 active judges, with 15 appointed by Democratic presidents and⁤ 13 by Republicans.

However, the 11-judge panel set ‍to reconsider the case will ⁢be ⁣randomly ‌selected, adding an element of⁣ unpredictability to the ‌proceedings.

Idaho’s Pro-Life Stance

Idaho Gov. Brad Little​ gestures during a press conference at the Statehouse in Boise, Idaho, ‍on Oct. 1, 2020. (Darin Oswald/Idaho ‍Statesman via AP)

The 2020 Idaho ban in question was a “trigger” ​law ​that hinged on the‍ Supreme Court overturning ⁣Roe v. Wade, the ⁢landmark decision that legalized abortion nationwide.

The​ law includes ⁣a very narrow ⁢exception, ​making it illegal ⁤except when an abortion is deemed necessary to prevent the mother’s death.

In January, the Idaho Supreme Court upheld ‌the state’s​ near-total ban ​on‌ abortion in response to a lawsuit ‍from Planned Parenthood, pointing out that the procedure is⁣ not an inalienable right according to the‌ state’s ⁣traditions.

In April, Idaho Gov. Brad Little, a Republican, signed a bill making it a criminal offense for an adult to help⁢ a minor get an abortion without‌ parental consent, ‍even if the procedure to terminate the pregnancy is⁤ done out of ‍state.

The new‍ law,⁤ House Bill 242, came into effect ​in ‌June, and formally established a new crime⁣ called “abortion trafficking.”

“With the U.S. Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe⁤ vs. Wade last summer, the right and duty to establish legal policy on abortion was finally‍ returned to‍ our state democratic process,” Mr. Little⁤ wrote⁤ in a letter to ⁢Idaho⁢ lawmakers, declaring he had signed⁤ the ⁣legislation.

The​ bill states⁢ that it is‌ not an “affirmative ⁣defense” to a prosecution under ​the ⁢new law for⁤ the ‍accused to argue that the abortion was ‍carried out in another state than Idaho, nor that the abortion ‍pills were obtained from⁤ an out-of-state provider.

The⁤ law therefore makes ‍it illegal​ for an adult to help a minor‌ cross ⁢state lines to obtain an abortion without parental consent. Called “abortion trafficking,” such an offense is punishable‍ by two to five years in​ prison.

Pro-life groups hailed the⁤ law,‍ highlighting that abortion providers had been luring women⁢ across state lines for the procedures.

Se, ​Idaho, on March 13, 2021. (Natalie Behring/Getty Images)Federal court temporarily restricts Idaho’s near-total abortion ban.Read More From Original Article Here: Federal Appeals Court Temporarily Limits Idaho’s Near-Total Abortion Ban


" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker