the federalist

Exclusive: Left-Wing ‘Alliance’ Bypasses Arizona’s ‘Zuckbucks’ Ban to Influence County Elections


A bevy‌ of emails⁢ obtained by ⁤The‌ Federalist reveal how‍ Coconino County officials have been violating the⁣ spirit⁢ of Arizona law by colluding with a coalition of left-wing nonprofits tasked with influencing election operations⁢ in ⁣key battleground states⁤ ahead of the 2024 election.

Last year, Coconino County — a Democrat stronghold that delivered Joe Biden a‍ margin of 17,646 votes in‌ 2020, greater ⁤than the margin of votes by which Biden ⁣won the state — became‍ one of several localities to join the U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence.​ The‌ Honest Elections Project describes the “Alliance” as an $80 million venture launched in 2022⁢ by left-wing nonprofits to “systematically influence every aspect of​ election administration” and advance Democrat-backed ‌voting policies in local​ election offices. ​Several of ⁣the organizations ‍ participating ‌ in the project ⁣include the Center for Civic Design, The Elections Group, and‌ the ​ Center for‌ Tech and ⁤Civic Life⁢ (CTCL), the latter ⁤of which‍ interfered in the 2020 election to the ⁢benefit of ⁣Democrats.​

During the‍ 2020 contest, CTCL and the Center for ⁤Election Innovation and‍ Research collectively received hundreds of millions of ⁢dollars from Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. These “Zuckbucks” were poured into local⁤ election offices in⁣ battleground states around the country ​to change how elections‍ were administered,⁣ such as ‌by⁣ expanding unsupervised election protocols like mail-in voting ⁤and the use of ballot drop boxes. To make‍ matters worse, the grants were heavily skewed⁢ towards Democrat-majority counties, essentially making​ it a‌ massive Democrat get-out-the-vote operation.

With Arizona and 26 ⁣other states ‍having passed measures restricting‍ the use of private money ‌in elections‌ in⁤ the years⁢ since, CTCL and other left-wing nonprofits devised ​the Alliance as a way to⁣ skirt these “Zuckbucks” bans. In a ⁢ 2023 report,⁣ the ​Honest Elections Project and John Locke Foundation revealed how the Alliance ⁤seeks ⁣to provide election offices ‍with “scholarships” to cover membership costs, which can then ‍be “converted‌ into ‘credits’ that member offices can use to buy services from CTCL ⁤and other⁢ Alliance partners.”

Obtained via open records request, the ‌communications reviewed by The Federalist document the process by ⁢which​ Coconino County officials worked behind the scenes to make their county an Alliance member. The extensive coordination⁢ between the county and coalition involves regular meetings on election administrative issues and⁢ the crafting ‌of​ election-related materials to distribute to voters ⁤ahead of Arizona’s 2024 elections.

Working Behind the Scenes to ​Skirt State Ban on Private Election Funding

While the U.S.​ Alliance for Election Excellence wasn’t publicly launched until April 11, 2022,​ Coconino County’s‍ connections with CTCL — an Alliance participant — date back​ to the⁤ 2020 election cycle. According to the Capital Research Center, Arizona received $5.1⁣ million from⁤ CTCL​ ahead of the November 2020 ‌contest, with more than three-fourths of that money ($3.9 million) ​going towards four of five counties​ won by Joe Biden. Coconino County ‌— which Biden⁣ won by more than 24 points — received the third largest grant per capita, behind Apache and Navajo Counties. ‍

Coconino’s established connection with ​CTCL made the Arizona locality a perfect target upon the Alliance’s spring 2022 launch. While Coconino wasn’t a part of the coalition’s ‌2022 inaugural cohort of participating election offices,‌ county recorder Patty Hansen, ⁤a Democrat, sought to gain her⁣ jurisdiction⁤ access ​to⁢ the ‌Alliance ​in​ the ⁣weeks following its reveal to the ⁤public.

On April 28, 2022,‍ Hansen submitted an application on behalf of Coconino​ to ⁢join the Alliance, which asks applicants to disclose specific⁣ information regarding their ​election administration. The questions included ⁣in the ‌application goad local election offices ​into revealing the size of their elections team, ⁢any “improvement” the office ​would⁢ like to make ⁢ahead of ⁢future elections, and “[h]ow much additional funding would⁤ make a meaningful difference” in altering ‍office ‍operations, among other information.

While Hansen received an automated email nearly​ a month later from CTCL confirming Coconino’s‍ application had ‌been received, Hansen didn’t appear to get a response from ⁤CTCL Associate Director Sophie Lehman until Nov. 22, 2022. In her email, Lehman notified Hansen that the⁢ Alliance had received Coconino’s application ​and expressed the ​coalition’s continued interest in making Coconino an Alliance member. Lehman further informed Hansen that she would receive an Alliance membership ⁢agreement ⁣after Thanksgiving and that CTCL was “meeting⁢ with Alliance partners and⁣ our expert legal team to ⁤design a membership structure so jurisdictions from across ‌the country can participate ​in the program.”

“To be⁤ clear, this is a pivot from our original‌ vision that would have offered Alliance programming for‍ free,” Lehman wrote.

Honest ​Elections Project Executive Director Jason⁤ Snead previously told The Federalist that CTCL shifted its “original model to a ⁢fee-based membership model” as a way ‌of skirting existing “Zuckbucks” bans. “For jurisdictions that are⁣ permitted to receive grants, those fees⁢ are effectively waived. But ‌jurisdictions that cannot receive private⁤ grants‍ can‌ still buy their way ‍in for a relatively small sum, ​allowing the ⁣Alliance to spread its influence ⁣even in states where lawmakers have ⁢tried to prevent it,” Snead​ explained.

On Dec. 13, 2022, Lehman ​informed Hansen⁤ that Coconino County had been​ designated​ as “a finalist in the inaugural cohort of Centers for Election Excellence” and ⁤provided ​a list of⁣ “next‍ steps” for the county to take⁢ to become an​ Alliance member. According to ⁣the Alliance membership agreement, counties are given⁣ the option of joining the coalition‌ as a basic​ or premium member,​ costing⁣ $1,600 or‌ $4,800 a year, respectively. ⁢

A basic membership grants participating counties access ​to “a ⁢selection of off-the-shelf, publicly-accessible election administration resources, document templates, ⁣and‍ training ‌materials,” and “center-specific coaching and consulting from select Alliance partners, in the form of‍ a $800 credit towards the fair market value of Alliance partners’⁢ hourly ‌consulting services,” among other services. Premium members are​ offered similar services, but ⁤are granted $3,040 in credit and “additional multi-center group coaching and consulting ⁣sessions hosted by select Alliance partners on ​an‌ hourly‍ basis.” ​

Hansen notified Lehman on Jan. 3, 2023, that Coconino County would be subscribing to the Alliance as a‍ basic member and⁣ disclosed that she had‌ discussed the legality of​ the county‌ joining the ​coalition with “our⁣ civil ‍division’s chief deputy county attorney,” who purportedly believed that Coconino joining the Alliance did not ⁢“violate[] any state laws.” Lehman replied two ​days later congratulating Hansen​ on Coconino becoming‌ an official member of the Alliance.

Hansen did not respond to The ⁢Federalist’s request for comment on whether taxpayer money was used ⁤to pay for Coconino County’s Alliance membership fee.

County Officials Briefed on Left-Wing Partners’ ‘Vision⁣ and Goals’

With Coconino County’s 2023 membership secured, the‌ Alliance‌ wasted no time in bringing the Arizona locality into the fold of its operations. On Jan. 4, 2023, ⁢Lehman offered ‍Hansen the opportunity to ⁢participate in a panel discussion on “election funding” at the Alliance’s “Debrief” event in Chicago the following month. As The Federalist previously reported, “The Debrief” was a three-day “inaugural” event designed “for‍ election officials and election experts to come together to distill key‌ lessons learned from‌ the 2022 election cycle and to plan for the years ahead.”

While Hansen initially expressed interest in participating ‍in‌ the panel, she ultimately backed out of attending the event in⁤ person due to​ her partner’s medical issues. Additional communications indicate ⁣Hansen and her “team” attended the event​ virtually.

But “The Debrief” was just one of ⁢many Alliance-sponsored meetings Coconino ​election officials‍ participated in throughout 2023. Shortly after joining the coalition, ‍Hansen and⁢ her ‍team were invited to and took part ‍in ‌a‍ virtual “Centers ‍for ​Election⁤ Excellence kickoff call”⁤ on Jan. 25, in which participants would “hear about the Alliance vision ⁤and ⁢goals,” meet other election offices “who have committed” to the Alliance, and meet the Alliance’s participating organizations.

Hansen and her colleagues were also invited in ⁣April 2023 to attend an in-person Alliance “cohort convening”⁢ in Las Vegas ​from May ⁤22-24.‍ Communication records confirm Ray Daw, Coconino County’s Native American elections outreach coordinator, represented⁢ the locality’s ​elections team in Las Vegas. Hansen and at least two colleagues opted to attend the event virtually.

Lehman would continue to email ‍Hansen⁣ throughout summer​ 2023, inviting the Coconino recorder ‌and her team to various meetings hosted by Alliance partners. These events included an Aug. 14 Zoom conference hosted by⁤ the Elections Group on “election cybersecurity” and several virtual “monthly cohort call[s]” launched on Aug.‍ 23. Emails also ⁢confirm⁢ Hansen attended ​the Alliance’s in-person “cohort‌ convening”‍ in Chicago ‍from Nov. ⁣29-Dec.​ 1.

Hansen did not respond to ‌The Federalist’s request for comment on whether taxpayer ⁢money‌ was used to pay for her and Daw’s respective travel-related⁣ expenses to Alliance events.

Coconino County Divulged Election Administration Data to Alliance

While Coconino⁣ County‌ officials’ meetings with Alliance partners and​ fellow members were a major facet of the election office-coalition⁢ relationship, the Arizona county’s willful⁤ exchange of sensitive information and‌ collusion with‌ the‍ Alliance on election-related matters remains equally concerning.

In addition to⁤ its invasive application questions, the Alliance requested Hansen disclose ‍information regarding ⁣Coconino County’s election office‍ practices. On March⁤ 8,​ 2023, for example, Lehman emailed ⁤Hansen several surveys​ that,‍ once completed, would provide the Alliance with a “snapshot of [Coconino’s election] office’s current practices around poll workers, and which practices [Hansen is] most interested ⁢in improving.” Lehman further noted that the Alliance would like to ‍“conduct ⁤an hour-long‍ interview” with Hansen’s office to learn more about Coconino County’s poll worker program.

“The‌ surveys and interviews will help the Alliance as a whole decide which resources to prioritize building and what kind of support‌ to provide,” Lehman claimed. While ⁣Lehman noted that ​the aforementioned survey questions were “optional,”⁣ a follow-up ‍email sent ​to Hansen in April indicated Hansen⁢ completed the​ surveys.

County Recorder Pushed Biden Agenda at⁢ Alliance’s Request

The⁣ Coconino-Alliance relationship was also ⁣very collaborative when it came to pushing ‍leftist causes. On March 9, 2023, ​Hansen received an ‌automated⁤ email from CTCL asking recipients to encourage their congressional representatives ⁢to support a provision in President Joe Biden’s⁤ 2024 fiscal year budget that⁢ included “$5 billion‍ over ⁢10 years for state and local election departments.” ⁤In an email sent to a CTCL representative the following day,⁢ Hansen expressed her‌ desire to “offer‍ my assistance ⁤with⁢ contacting my representatives to urge them to support” including the ‌provision in the 2024 budget.⁤ In her email, Hansen predicted that her congressman, GOP Rep. Eli Crane, would not support the initiative, noting Crane’s role as a member of ​the House Freedom Caucus and referring to the Arizona Republican as a so-called ‍“election​ denier.”⁢

Hansen further noted that ‌she would‌ “be happy” to reach‍ out to several Democrat members of ‌Arizona’s congressional delegation,​ including‌ Rep. Ruben Gallego and⁢ Sen. Mark Kelly, to push the ‍initiative forward. A March 27 email⁢ from CTCL’s Sofia Martinez indicates Hansen submitted funding ‍requests to Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, ⁣an independent who caucuses with Senate ⁢Democrats, and Kelly. ⁢

Alliance ​Partners Helped Design Voter Guide

But Coconino ​and⁣ the Alliance’s collusive efforts didn’t stop‍ there. Roughly a ⁢month after the⁢ Alliance’s February 2023 ⁣“Debrief” event, Hansen emailed‌ Lehman requesting the Center for Civic ‍Design’s (CCD) assistance in creating a new version⁤ of Coconino‍ County’s 2024 Voter Guide. Hansen included “a couple of‌ these‍ mailings” her office used leading up to prior​ elections ⁢and⁢ noted how the county sends 90-day notice mailings “to all of the registered ⁢voters in‍ the county every ‌two years” to‌ verify the accuracy​ of its voter ⁤rolls.

“In⁢ 2016 we decided to do ‍a⁢ Voter Guide ⁤for the upcoming state elections. It’s been very well ⁢received by the voters, but I ⁢think ​we can improve it,” Hansen wrote. “Arizona also‌ has a complicated ⁤system for our Active (used to be⁤ called Permanent) Early Voting list mailing. We’d like to see if [CCD] ‌can help⁢ us​ develop a​ less legalize mailing to our voters that explains the process.” ‌

Donna ​Casner, Coconino County’s chief deputy ‍recorder,⁣ later ‌sent Hansen templates of⁢ the county’s 2022 ⁢90-day‌ notice ⁢on March ⁢28, 2023, which Hansen then forwarded to Lehman the same day.

Coconino’s collaboration with​ the Alliance on these ‌new election materials⁤ continued into⁣ the fall, at​ which point Lehman connected Hansen​ with CCD’s Tasmin ⁤Swanson. After a series of emails, ‌the two women scheduled a ⁣Zoom meeting for⁢ Oct. 18, ​which‍ Hansen indicated would be ‍attended by herself, Casner, and their colleague, Sedona Stone.⁤ Less than a⁤ week later, Casner ⁢emailed Swanson three “variations” of Coconino’s 2022 90-day notice ⁣templates “including variable data fields, along with an excerpt from [the office’s] procedures⁢ manual that‍ outlines the mandatory requirements for the‌ notice.”

Collaboration between Coconino County election officials and CCD continued ‌into November, at which point CCD’s Randy Hadzor was brought⁣ into the mix to assist the ‍Arizona locality on redesigning its 90-day notice. In her Nov. 2 email providing Hansen and Casner ‌with CCD’s proposal ⁣for the redesign, Swanson noted that the project would likely use up the remaining credit ‍Coconino County⁤ received upon subscribing to the Alliance. A Dec. 8 email from Hadzor to Casner⁣ indicated​ the new redesign was “coming along nicely,” with Hadzor expressing ⁣hope that ⁢he would ‍“be able to send over some preliminary concepts ⁢for your review soon.”

The​ Road Ahead

The Alliance’s efforts to influence and acquire ‍information about local‍ election operations is hardly exclusive to Coconino County. Localities in ​battleground ⁣states ​throughout the country, such as⁣ Georgia’s DeKalb County, for example, ​have become ⁣targets of the Alliance’s scheme ⁤to‍ replicate CTCL’s 2020 election ​shenanigans.⁤ Rather ‌than allow ‌states and localities to manage their elections, as the Constitution prescribes, leftist groups such ​as those comprising the Alliance are intent on dipping their hands into the electoral process to steer elections in Democrats’ favor.

[READ​NEXT:[READNEXT:Exclusive: DeKalb County Officials Skirted‍ Georgia Law To Acquire Funds From Left-Wing Dark Money Elections⁤ Group]

While⁤ speaking with The Federalist, Republican National Committee spokesman Gates McGavick⁢ referred ​to the Alliance as ⁣a “trojan horse for far-left dark money ⁢to influence elections,” and called on Coconino County to be⁢ transparent⁤ about ‌its active⁢ relationship with the coalition.

“Arizona has a ban on third-party ‘Zuckbucks’ to prevent groups just like the ‍ [Alliance] from unduly ‍influencing ‌local election administration,” McGavick said. “Sunlight ‍is the best disinfectant, and Coconino County should answer for its collaboration with [the Alliance].”

Communication records ‍show that the ‍Alliance has since offered Coconino County the⁤ opportunity to remain an Alliance member ⁢throughout 2024.

Hansen did not respond to ⁢The Federalist’s ‍request for comment on whether, as of Monday, Coconino County completed and submitted the 2024 Alliance membership agreement ⁢or intends to do​ so.


rnrn

How ​did​ the Center for Tech and Civic Life and other left-wing nonprofits‍ circumvent bans on private funding in elections, and how did this affect Coconino County’s ⁢relationship with‍ the Alliance

Title: Coconino​ County Officials Collaborate with Left-Wing Nonprofits to Influence Election Operations

Introduction:

A series of emails obtained by The Federalist has shed light on the ⁢violation of Arizona law by ⁢Coconino‍ County⁢ officials. These emails reveal a collusion⁢ between the county and ​a coalition of left-wing nonprofits known as the U.S.​ Alliance for Election⁣ Excellence.⁢ The⁤ purpose ⁢of this collaboration is to influence ‌election operations in key battleground states​ ahead of ⁢the 2024 election.

Background:

Coconino County, a⁣ Democrat stronghold, played a​ significant role in delivering a margin of 17,646 votes to Joe Biden in the 2020 election. It became one of several ⁣localities to join⁢ the U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence in⁣ 2020. ⁢This‍ Alliance, launched by ⁣left-wing nonprofits, aims ⁤to⁢ exert influence over‌ election administration and advance Democrat-backed voting policies.

Influence ⁢of Dark Money:

During ​the 2020 election cycle, the Center⁣ for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) and the Center for Election‍ Innovation and Research received significant funding from Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. These ⁢funds, known as “Zuckbucks,” were poured into battleground states to change election administration practices, including ‍the⁤ expansion of mail-in ‌voting. Coconino County was among the recipients ​of⁤ these funds, further highlighting ‌its relevance in the Alliance’s plans.

Skirting Private Election Funding Bans:

In response to states passing measures restricting ‍the ‌use of private money in elections,‍ CTCL and other left-wing nonprofits devised the U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence. This coalition offers election offices “scholarships” that can be converted into credits used to buy services from ‍Alliance partners. By offering these scholarships, the Alliance aims to bypass bans on​ private funding, ensuring its continued influence.

Coconino‍ County’s Membership Process:

Coconino​ County’s connection with CTCL predates ‍the formation of the Alliance.‌ County⁤ recorder Patty Hansen applied on behalf of the county to join the Alliance in ⁣April 2022, shortly after its public launch. After ​several exchanges, Coconino County was designated⁤ as a finalist and eventually became an official⁤ member in January 2023, paying an annual‌ fee for membership.

Briefings and Collaborations:

Coconino​ County ⁣officials actively participated ‌in Alliance-sponsored meetings and events⁢ throughout 2023. They attended panel discussions, kickoff calls,​ and cohort convenings, both‌ virtually and in-person. These interactions allowed for extensive collaboration on various election-related matters, including the design of ​voter guides and the⁤ exchange of sensitive election administration data.

Pushing the⁤ Biden⁢ Agenda:

Emails​ indicate‌ that Coconino County officials ​actively ‍supported President Joe Biden’s ‌agenda at⁣ the ​Alliance’s⁤ request. They were⁢ encouraged to contact their congressional representatives to advocate ⁤for provisions in Biden’s 2024 fiscal year budget that allocated funds for state and​ local election departments.

Conclusion:

The collaboration ​between Coconino County officials and the U.S. ‍Alliance for Election Excellence raises ⁤significant concerns about the transparency⁢ and legality of⁣ election operations. ⁤The violation of Arizona law and the extensive influence ⁣exerted⁣ by left-wing nonprofits demonstrate the need‌ for⁣ transparency and accountability in ⁢election administration. As the⁣ 2024 elections approach, it ‍becomes crucial to ensure⁣ that election​ processes are fair, impartial, and ⁤free from external interference.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
×
Adam
Adam
News Journalist
Hello, I am Adam, how can I help you?
 
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker