Elon Musk’s Twitter Buy Is The First Real Accountability Big Tech Censors Face For Their 2020 Election Meddling

Nearly two years after the chaotic, shenanigan-plagued 2020 election, Tesla CEO and new Twitter owner Elon Musk is making the first attempt to hold Big Tech censors responsible for their disgraceful election manipulation tactics.

After a long battle, the mega-billionaire officially acquired his stake in Twitter on Thursday night. His top priority? Firing four of the company’s top executives: CEO Parag Agrawal, CFO Ned Segal, legal and safety executive Vijaya Gadde, and General Counsel Sean Edgett.

By the gnashing of teeth and wailing from Twitter employees, corporate media mouthpieces, and other leftist elites who are quick to defend Big Tech censors, a stranger might think these Twitter heads were unjustly ousted. In reality, Agrawal, Segal, Gadde, and Edgett got what should have come to them two years ago when they knowingly interfered with the 2020 election to help install Joe Biden in the White House.

Twitter doesn’t like to admit who on its staff is ultimately responsible for the suppression of information that makes ruling elites and Democrats look bad, especially ahead of key elections, but it was under the now-fired leadership’s watch that Twitter banned and censored conservatives, Covid-19 jab skeptics, election-integrity supporters, legitimate reporting, and those who told the truth about the sexes.

Oftentimes, Twitter executed this censorship with undeniable arrogance and no remorse. That’s why when Agrawal openly admitted that he believed Twitter’s “role is not to be bound by the First Amendment, but our role is to serve a healthy public conversation,” he wasn’t chided for contradicting the social media company’s supposed commitment to advancing free speech. Instead, he was rewarded with a short-lived spot as CEO and congratulated by Twitter founder Jack Dorsey for his “transformational” work. Agrawal quickly used that power to usher in a new era of partisan crackdowns.

Gadde, who handed down the decision to ban the sitting president, wasn’t criticized for unjustly removing the sitting president and world’s biggest critic of Big Tech. Instead, her attempts to keep Trump and his campaign off of the internet were hailed as heroic, necessary, and moral.

Big Tech censors like Agrawal and Gadde don’t deny that they manipulated the flow of information in the months leading up to the 2020 election. Instead, they wear their partisan censorship like a badge of pride. That’s why Mark Zuckerberg had no problem publicly admitting that Facebook was ready to censor whatever information necessary to preserve the elite establishment’s desired outcome for the 2020 presidential race.

“The FBI basically came to us and spoke to some folks on our team and was like, ‘Hey, just so you know, you should be on high alert. We thought that there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election. We have it on notice that basically there’s about to be some kind of dump similar to that,’” Zuckerberg said.

The biggest example of that online tampering came in October 2020, weeks before the election, when the New York Post published a series of reports containing