El Sayed dodges question on whether Israel or Iran poses greater threat to US
A politician from Michigan, Abdul el Sayed, declined to specify whether Israel or Iran poses a greater threat to the U.S. during a debate,dismissing the question as a “ridiculous hypothetical.” Instead, he emphasized domestic issues like education and healthcare over foreign policy concerns. The article also includes prompts for subscribing to the Washington Examiner for full access to their news, analysis, and commentary, with options to log in or subscribe.
Democratic Michigan Senate nominee Abdul el Sayed refused to say whether Israel or Iran poses a greater threat to the United States during a debate Thursday night, calling the question a “ridiculous hypothetical” as he defended his opposition to American involvement in the conflict with Tehran.
Pressed repeatedly by moderator Rick Albin to identify which country he considered more dangerous, el Sayed instead pivoted to domestic priorities, arguing that taxpayers should spend money on education, healthcare, and other needs at home.
Stay informed.Stay ahead.
Join Washington Examiner for unlimited access to the news, analysis, and commentary that matter most.
Already a member? Log in
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
