Dr. David Bell discusses public health and the rise of ‘international fascism’.
Many people believe that COVID-19 is no longer a threat and that life is returning to normal. However, according to a public health physician and former World Health Organization (WHO) medical officer, international public health agencies tell a different story.
Dr. Bell, speaking on EpochTV’s “American Thought Leaders” program, explains that institutions focused on pandemic preparedness are actually growing and expanding.
One example is a WHO document published in April 2022, titled “Strengthening WHO Preparedness For and Response to Health Emergencies.” This document proposes changes to the International Health Regulations (IHR) that have since been amended.
Negotiations are ongoing to further amend the regulations in preparation for future pandemics, with 300 proposed amendments currently under consideration, according to a WHO press release on Oct. 7.
Dr. Bell recently published an article in the American Journal of Economics and Sociology titled ”Pandemic Preparedness and the Road to International Fascism.” In this article, he aims to provoke critical thinking within the public health community, as he believes their actions have often caused harm to society.
Dr. Bell points out that the tactics used by governments and the media to promote vaccination mandates resemble classic fascist approaches. However, he emphasizes that this is not a new phenomenon, tracing similar tactics back to the era of colonialism and the eugenics movement of the 1920s and 1930s.
According to Dr. Bell, the first step towards a fascist framework, similar to the one he believes is currently in place, is the close cooperation between large corporations and governments. He cites the involvement of Microsoft’s Bill Gates with vaccine manufacturers as an example.
Dr. Bell draws parallels between the technocracy and eugenics movements of the early 20th century and the current situation. He explains that these movements, which favored government by experts and the belief in an elite managing the rest for the greater good, were once seen as progressive.
Eugenics, in particular, gained support from progressive reform thinkers who sought to use science to solve social problems. However, it eventually led to policies such as forced sterilization, which are now considered inhumane.
Dr. Bell highlights the fallacy that pandemics are automatically existential threats and argues that there are defenses against viruses, such as vitamin D. He also questions the disproportionate impact of lockdown policies on certain groups and the lack of consideration for the long-term consequences.
He criticizes the WHO for being a pool of bureaucrats rather than a pool of expertise and questions the logic of granting them more power. Dr. Bell believes that a change can occur if people recognize the truth and act accordingly.
What concerns does Dr. Bell raise regarding the expansion of institutions focused on pandemic preparedness and its potential impact on national sovereignty and democratic processes?
Discusses the concern that measures taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may lead to the erosion of individual liberties and the rise of authoritarianism on a global scale.
In his article, Dr. Bell highlights how emergency measures have been implemented worldwide, including lockdowns, travel restrictions, and vaccine mandates, often with little regard for individual rights and freedoms. He raises the issue of excessive government control and the potential for abuse of power in the name of public health.
Furthermore, Dr. Bell warns that the expansion of institutions focused on pandemic preparedness may lead to the establishment of a global governance structure with significant authority over individual nations. He refers to this as “international fascism,” where power is concentrated in the hands of a few global elites, thereby bypassing national sovereignty and democratic processes.
This concern is not unfounded. As Dr. Bell points out, the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations would grant the WHO greater power and control over member states. This includes the ability to declare a global health emergency, impose travel restrictions, and even mandate vaccines, without the need for the approval or consent of national governments.
While the intentions behind these measures may be rooted in public health and safety, it is crucial to balance the need for effective pandemic response with the preservation of individual rights and freedoms. Dr. Bell emphasizes the importance of maintaining a democratic and transparent approach to decision-making, with respect for national sovereignty and the principles of personal liberty.
In conclusion, the belief that COVID-19 is no longer a threat and that life is returning to normal may be premature. International public health agencies continue to prioritize pandemic preparedness and seek greater authority over member states. It is essential for individuals and nations to remain vigilant and ensure that measures taken in response to the pandemic do not result in the erosion of fundamental rights and the establishment of a global governance structure that undermines democratic processes. As Dr. Bell’s research suggests, the road to pandemic preparedness must not lead us down the path of international fascism.
