DOJ appeals Proud Boys’ Jan. 6 sentences.
The Department of Justice Appeals Sentences of Convicted Proud Boys
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has taken action to appeal the sentences of five convicted Proud Boys, including Enrique Tarrio, the former leader of the group. The DOJ aims to secure harsher punishments for those involved in the Capitol breach on January 6, 2021.
The penalties for the four individuals convicted of seditious conspiracy ranged from 15 to 22 years, with Tarrio receiving the longest term at 22 years. However, these sentences were considerably shorter than what prosecutors had initially requested.
The Oct. 17 court filings were made without presenting any arguments, and the notice of appeal simply informs the court of the prosecution’s intention to file an appeal.
Related Stories
-
9/13/2023
-
9/5/2023
However, the DOJ’s actions align with its approach to similar cases related to the January 6 breach, such as the Oath Keepers, whose sentences have also been appealed.
Tarrio and three of his associates were convicted in May for conspiring to block the transfer of presidential power, with the aim of keeping President Donald Trump in the White House after the 2020 election.
Prosecutors had initially requested a 33-year sentence for Tarrio and one of his co-defendants, Joseph Biggs, a self-described Proud Boys organizer.
They also sought a 30-year prison term for Zachary Rehl, president of the Proud Boys chapter in Philadelphia; 27 years for Ethan Nordean, president of a Proud Boys chapter in Auburn, Washington; and 20 years for Dominic Pezzola, a Proud Boys member from Rochester, New York.
Although Tarrio was not present in Washington on January 6, 2021, as he had been arrested two days earlier in a separate case, prosecutors alleged that he organized and directed the attack by the Proud Boys on the Capitol.
Defense attorneys argued that there was no conspiracy or plan to attack the Capitol, portraying the Proud Boys as an unorganized drinking club whose involvement in the riot was a spontaneous act fueled by former President Donald Trump’s rhetoric.
Prosecutors sought a “terrorism enhancement” in the sentencing, claiming that the Proud Boys aimed to influence the government through “intimidation or coercion.”
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta agreed with this argument in the case of the Oath Keepers but still sentenced them to prison terms shorter than what the prosecutors had requested.
Tarrio and his co-defendants were sentenced before U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly in a series of hearings that took place later in the month in Washington’s federal court.
Stewart Rhodes, the founder of the Oath Keepers, was convicted of seditious conspiracy in a separate case and received an 18-year sentence, the longest at that point.
Following his conviction, Tarrio told media outlet Gateway Pundit in late September that the DOJ asked him to sign a statement proving that “through several degrees of separation and connections, Tarrio had communicated with Trump regarding ‘plans’ for January 6.”
“They asked me to lie about President Trump in order to indict him,” he said. “I told them to pound sand, and because I refused to lie about President Trump, it cost me 22 years of my life.
“The truth is, I could have been home. I could have been home a long time ago. I could be in my warm … bed right now, laughing at the world, without a problem … and all I had to do in order to do that was lie about Trump. All I had to do was confirm a lie.”
Tarrio claimed that the DOJ approached him about the cooperation pact in or around October 2022, well before Jack Smith was named as special counsel to investigate President Trump.
“Everything they wanted me to say is fabricated,” he said. “This is how they are going to try to present evidence for Trump’s trial. … Find a bunch of people that do not want to go to jail to make up a story just to avoid jail time.”
Why did Judge Mehta hand down sentences that were shorter than what the prosecution had requested in the case of Tarrio and his co-defendants?
E case of Tarrio and his co-defendants, stating that their actions were meant to “undermine and overthrow the lawful transfer of presidential power.” However, Judge Mehta ultimately handed down sentences that were shorter than what the prosecution had requested.
The DOJ’s decision to appeal these sentences is part of its ongoing effort to hold accountable those responsible for the Capitol breach and to send a message that such actions will not be tolerated. The department has made it clear that it will pursue harsher punishments for individuals involved in the attack, including those associated with extremist groups like the Proud Boys.
The Proud Boys, founded in 2016, gained notoriety for their involvement in political rallies and protests, often engaging in confrontations with left-wing activists. The group has been labeled as a “hate group” by the Southern Poverty Law Center due to its white nationalist and anti-immigrant views.
Following the Capitol breach, which resulted in the death of five people and the vandalization of the iconic building, the Proud Boys faced increased scrutiny and legal action. According to court documents, Tarrio and his associates actively participated in planning and executing the attack, with Tarrio allegedly taking a leading role in organizing the group’s actions.
The DOJ’s appeal of their sentences demonstrates the department’s commitment to holding accountable those who sought to disrupt and undermine the democratic process. It also highlights the seriousness with which the government views the actions of extremist groups and individuals who engage in violence in pursuit of their political objectives.
The outcome of the DOJ’s appeal remains uncertain, as it will be up to the appellate court to determine whether the sentences handed down by Judge Mehta were appropriate. However, the department’s decision to appeal sends a clear message that it will not shy away from seeking justice in cases where it believes the punishment does not match the severity of the crime.
As the legal proceedings continue, the DOJ and other law enforcement agencies will keep investigating and prosecuting individuals involved in the Capitol breach. The events of January 6, 2021, serve as a stark reminder of the importance of upholding the rule of law and preserving the integrity of the democratic process.
Ultimately, the DOJ’s actions to appeal the sentences of the convicted Proud Boys demonstrate the government’s commitment to holding accountable those who threaten the foundations of democracy through acts of violence. It is a testament to the department’s dedication to ensuring justice and protecting the democratic principles upon which the United States was built.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
