[]
Conservative News Daily

Did Ramaswamy triumph in the debate with his 23-second rain of fire?

Did Ramaswamy Win the ‌Debate with This 23 ⁤Second ⁣Rain of Fire?

GOP presidential‌ candidate Vivek Ramaswamy delivered a powerful and engaging⁢ performance during ⁤Wednesday ⁤night’s presidential primary debate in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. In just ​23 seconds, Ramaswamy succinctly listed four issues that many Republicans can agree on.

“If you want⁤ somebody who’s going to speak truth to power,‍ then ​vote for somebody that’s going to speak the truth to you,” the⁤ businessman confidently stated.

Ramaswamy boldly⁢ challenged the status quo,⁣ addressing controversial topics head-on. He expressed his belief that the January 6th incident was an ⁢inside job, and that the‌ government has ⁢been lying about Saudi Arabia’s involvement in 9/11 for two decades. He ​also ⁢argued that ⁤the great ⁣replacement theory, often dismissed as a ⁣right-wing ‍conspiracy, is actually a⁣ fundamental ⁤part of the Democratic Party’s platform. ⁣Additionally, Ramaswamy claimed⁢ that the⁣ 2020 election was ⁢stolen⁤ by Big Tech.

These‌ statements by ‍Ramaswamy have sparked ⁢intense debate and controversy. ​The New York Post⁢ reported that the FBI had so many paid‍ informants at the ⁣Capitol on ⁤January 6th, 2021, that they lost track‍ of the number. ‌There are even claims that at least⁣ one informant ‍was communicating ​with their FBI handler as they entered the ‍Capitol.

In a‍ previous Senate ‌Judiciary Committee hearing, GOP Sen. Ted ​Cruz questioned the involvement of FBI agents and confidential informants​ in the events of January 6th. However, the‌ FBI assistant executive director refused to provide specific details.

The great⁣ replacement theory, which suggests ‌that President Joe Biden opened the southern border to change the ​voting demographics of the U.S., has also been a topic‍ of discussion. ⁢Senate ⁤Majority Leader​ Chuck Schumer openly stated that the‌ Democratic Party’s goal ‌is to provide a pathway to ⁣citizenship for illegal immigrants living in the U.S.

Lastly, Ramaswamy raised ​concerns about Big Tech’s ‍influence on the 2020 ⁤election. ⁢He ⁤pointed to⁤ the suppression of ⁢the Hunter Biden laptop story‍ and the significant financial contributions made by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to key counties. These‌ actions included placing ‍poll workers in election offices.


The debate performance by Vivek Ramaswamy has ignited a​ firestorm of ⁣discussion and controversy. His bold ‌statements and willingness to challenge the status ​quo have resonated with many Republicans. Only time will tell ​how his words will‌ impact the political landscape.

Source: The Western Journal

Can the ​FBI provide any clarification on their statement regarding gents or informants’ involvement⁤ in the events of January 6th, 2021?

Gents or‍ informants actively participate in the events of January ‌6th, 2021?’‌

FBI: ‘I can’t ⁤speak to that specific matter.'”

—⁤ Steven Nelson‍ (@stevennelson10) July 13, 2021

Regarding the ⁣government’s alleged lies about⁤ Saudi Arabia’s involvement in the 9/11 attacks, there have ‌been ongoing debates and investigations.​ In 2016, Congress passed the⁤ Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, which allowed victims of ⁤the 9/11 attacks ⁣to sue Saudi ⁢Arabia for its alleged ⁣involvement. However, the extent of Saudi Arabia’s role in the attacks continues to be a contentious issue.

The ⁢great ‌replacement theory, which asserts that there ‍is a deliberate ​and systematic plan to replace white populations with non-white immigrants,⁢ has been a topic of immense debate and criticism. Ramaswamy’s claim that it is a fundamental part of the Democratic Party’s platform challenges prevailing narratives and invites further discussion on the topic.

Lastly, Ramaswamy’s assertion that ‌the 2020 election was stolen by Big‍ Tech​ is a claim that has been widely ⁢echoed by​ many Republicans.​ The influence of social ⁣media platforms and tech companies on the ⁢election process⁤ has​ raised ‍concerns ​about potential biases and manipulation, and has fueled discussions about the need for ⁢greater transparency and⁤ accountability in the⁣ digital sphere.

While Ramaswamy’s statements may be controversial, they have⁣ undoubtedly ignited conversations and debates on these important issues. The fact ⁣that he was able to succinctly express these positions in just 23 seconds speaks to⁢ his⁣ rhetorical skills and ability to captivate an audience. However, winning‌ a debate ultimately ⁤depends on the perspectives and⁢ biases⁤ of the‌ viewers.

It ⁤is important for voters to remain critical ⁢thinkers,‍ fact-check claims, and seek a variety of ⁣sources to form well-rounded opinions. Debates serve as a platform for candidates to express their views, but it is⁣ up to the voters ‍to evaluate the validity and relevance of those claims. In a democratic society, an informed‌ and engaged citizenry is crucial for maintaining accountability and​ fostering constructive dialogue.

Only time will ⁤tell how Ramaswamy’s ​performance in this debate will impact his⁢ presidential campaign. ​It is evident, however, that his bold ‍and controversial statements have left a significant impression on⁤ viewers and have‍ generated widespread discussion and‌ analysis. It ‌also ⁢underscores the importance of debates in ​shaping public⁣ opinion and influencing the course of political events.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker