The Western Journal

Developing: Saudi Arabia Has Joined US, Israel, and UAE – Now Revealed to Have Been Attacking Iran as Well

A Reuters report says Saudi arabia carried out previously unpublicized, covert attacks on Iran in late March as retaliation for attacks on Saudi sites during the recent Middle East conflict. The report cites sources indicating the strikes were follow-ups to Iranian actions.It also notes that the UAE reportedly attacked Iran as well, but that Saudi officials maintained contact with Iran through diplomatic channels, and both sides agreed afterward to de-escalate.

The article includes commentary from analysts suggesting the actions reflect how seriously Iran is viewed as a threat by Saudi Arabia, and how the UAE’s approach may signal a deeper alignment with the U.S. and Israel. Despite the counterattacks, officials credited the eventual agreement to reduce hostilities as a pragmatic effort to prevent escalation into a wider regional war.




Saudi Arabia covertly counterattacked Iran after Saudi sites were attacked during the recent conflict, according to a new report.

The news from Reuters comes after previous reports said the United Arab Emirates also attacked Iran.

The previously unpublicized attacks took place in late March, Reuters reported, citing a source it did not name as saying the attacks were in retaliation for Iranian strikes.


Reuters noted that while the two Arab nations counterattacked Iran, the UAE has been more aggressive and largely eschewed diplomacy during the conflict, while the Saudis kept in touch with Iran through diplomatic channels.

The report said that after the Saudi attacks, Saudi officials and Iranian officials agreed to de-escalate.

An Iranian official said the nations agreed to “cease hostilities, safeguard mutual interests, and prevent the escalation of tensions.”

Ali Vaez, the Iran Project Director at the International Crisis Group, said there is “pragmatic recognition on both sides that uncontrolled escalation carries unacceptable costs.”

The de-escalation agreement showed “not trust, but a d interest in imposing limits on confrontation before it ‌spiraled into a ⁠wider regional conflict.”

In an op-ed in the Saudi-owned Arab News, former Saudi intelligence chief Prince Turki al-Faisal wrote that “when Iran and others tried to drag the kingdom into the furnace of destruction, our leadership chose to endure the pains caused by a neighbor in order to protect the lives and property of its citizens.”

The UAE attacks in particular are a “big deal” because they represent the “operationalization” of the UAE’s decision to ally itself with the U.S. and Israel, Bilal Saab, senior managing director of TRENDS US, said, according to Newsweek.

There is “no friendly return on something like this,” Saab added.

Center for Strategic and International Studies Middle East Program Director Mona Yacoubian said the Saudi attacks were also significant.

“A Saudi decision to strike Iran, if verified, underscores the acuteness of threat perceived from Iran by Saudi Arabia and a need to respond offensively to deter future Iranian strikes,” Yacoubian said.

Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.









" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker