Dems discuss Trump, ridicule hearing while GOPers highlight mounting Biden impeachment proof.
Engaging Paraphrase of the Text:
In a historic impeachment inquiry hearing held by the House of Representatives on September 28, Democrats, Republicans, and the four witnesses found common ground: there is currently insufficient evidence to remove President Joe Biden from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” as mandated by the Constitution.
However, the disagreement arose when it came to determining whether the extensive evidence presented by Republicans warranted further investigation. Democrats, led by Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), vehemently argued that there was “no evidence, no smoke, no gun,” dismissing the thousands of pages of bank records presented by Republicans.
During the hearing, Mr. Raskin stood alongside three Democratic staffers, each holding a box of documents containing over 12,000 pages of bank records.
Related Stories
-
Biden Impeachment Inquiry Hearing: Rep. Jordan Questions Witness on ‘3 Things’ That Warrant Formal Inquiry
9/28/2023 -
Amid Impeachment Inquiry Hearing, House Oversight Committee Shoots Down Motions to Have Rudy Giuliani Appear
9/28/2023
Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability immediately challenged Mr. Raskin’s claims. Mr. Comer pointed out that if all the evidence received so far were placed in boxes like the ones presented, they would reach the ceiling of the Rayburn House Office Building, where the hearing took place.
Throughout the six-plus hours of the hearing, Republicans presented numerous examples from the extensive collection of documents, emails, texts, and memoranda. They argued that these materials illustrated a decade-long pattern of influence-peddling by Hunter Biden, the president’s son, and his associates, who allegedly sold access to the “Big Guy” in exchange for at least $24 million from foreign entities in 23 different countries.
Democrats, on the other hand, repeatedly dismissed the hearing as a futile exercise, with Rep. Shontel Brown (D-Ohio) calling it a collection of “baseless allegations and facts that just don’t exist.” They also insisted on subpoenaing former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, a close confidante of former President Donald Trump, as he was the source of the allegations against the Bidens.
Witness Testimonies
During the hearing, motions were made by Mr. Raskin and Rep. Kweisi Mfume (D-Md.) to subpoena Mr. Giuliani and his former business partner, Lev Parnas. However, both motions were defeated along party lines. Democrats repeatedly referred to a letter from Mr. Parnas, claiming that the allegations had no substance.
One notable moment came when Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) cross-examined a witness, mockingly substituting “Biden” for “Trump” in sentences describing past policies. This drew attention to the contrasting approaches of the two parties. While Democrats focused on President Trump, Republicans delved into an organizational chart produced by IRS investigators, which revealed Hunter Biden’s business practices and allegations of tax evasion.
Rep. Lisa McLain (R-Mich.) highlighted Vice President Biden’s involvement in U.S. anti-corruption efforts in Romania, pointing out financial transactions involving the Biden family and a corrupt Russian oligarch. Meanwhile, Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.) accused committee Republicans of wasting time on a campaign strategy to benefit Donald Trump.
Throughout the hearing, witnesses provided differing opinions. Former Assistant Attorney General Eileen O’Connor and George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley agreed that there was enough evidence to justify the impeachment inquiry, while Mr. Dubinski disagreed.
How did Democrats respond to the allegations against Hunter Biden and the evidence presented by Republicans?
Edly emphasized that there is no direct evidence linking President Biden to any wrongdoing. They argued that the allegations against Hunter Biden were baseless and politically motivated, aimed at undermining the president’s credibility.
The House of Representatives held a significant impeachment inquiry hearing on September 28th, where both Democrats and Republicans, along with the four witnesses, agreed that there was currently insufficient evidence to remove President Joe Biden from office for any high crimes and misdemeanors as stated in the Constitution. However, the disagreement arose when it came to further investigation of the extensive evidence presented by Republicans. The Democrats, led by Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), vehemently dismissed the evidence, claiming there was no smoke, no gun, and disregarding the thousands of pages of bank records presented by Republicans.
During the hearing, Mr. Raskin appeared with three Democratic staffers, each holding a box of documents containing over 12,000 pages of bank records.
Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability immediately challenged Mr. Raskin’s claims. He pointed out that if all the evidence received so far were placed in boxes like the ones presented, they would reach the ceiling of the Rayburn House Office Building, where the hearing took place.
Throughout the six-plus hours of the hearing, Republicans provided numerous examples from a vast collection of documents, emails, texts, and memoranda. They argued that these materials demonstrated a decade-long pattern of influence-peddling by Hunter Biden and his associates. Allegedly, they sold access to the “Big Guy” in exchange for at least $24 million from foreign entities in 23 different countries.
Democrats, on the other hand, consistently emphasized that there is no direct evidence connecting President Biden to any wrongdoing. They dismissed the allegations against Hunter Biden as unfounded and politically motivated, aimed at undermining the president’s credibility.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
