Washington Examiner

Democrats are plotting a potential uprising if Trump is reelected


Democrats have ​spent the last three years⁤ labeling former President Donald Trump and any other Republican who questioned the 2020 presidential election results as “insurrectionists.” But ⁤as their efforts to ‍either imprison Trump or ⁢throw him off the⁣ ballot have shown, they are ready to do just⁤ about anything⁣ to ensure he can’t win a second term in 2024. But with President Joe Biden falling in the polls ⁢and Trump demonstrating that he could win, they ⁤need a backup plan⁣ if the courts won’t do‌ their bidding.

As an ‍article in The Atlantic last week made clear, they have one in ‌mind. The only problem is that it involves Democrats doing exactly what they​ labeled as ⁣“insurrection”‌ when ⁤Republicans⁣ half-heartedly played at doing the same thing in January 2021, when some⁤ of them voted ⁣not to certify ‍the vote of the Electoral College​ that handed the election to Biden.​ And if ‍Democrats win control of⁤ Congress ​in ⁢November, something that could happen even if Trump also wins the presidency, they could succeed where the GOP failed and overturn ‌the election.

Democratic prosecutors and‌ judges have imprisoned thousands of ‍people for being present at the ‍Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Democrats ⁢also spent years⁣ labeling the efforts of Trump ⁢supporters to find a legal⁢ way⁢ to overturn the 2020 results they ⁣considered potentially⁢ fraudulent as another form of insurrection ​or even, in the case of⁢ the tainted Georgia prosecutions led by Fani ⁤Willis, a violation of the federal Racketeer⁣ Influenced and ⁤Corrupt Organizations statute⁣ that aimed at curbing mafia ‍activity.

But anyone who imagines that the charge of hypocrisy will‍ stop Democrats from doing anything they ⁣can to stop Trump from taking office hasn’t been⁢ paying attention to American politics for the last eight years. Having convinced themselves ⁤that Trump is an​ authoritarian threat to American democracy as well as a ⁤stooge of Vladimir Putin — with the Russian collusion hoax​ now being revived ⁤— ‍it ‍is inconceivable ‍that⁢ even a clear defeat in the November election would prevent them from⁣ using ‍every means ⁣at their disposal to overturn such a result.

Media and Lawfare Campaign

Since 2021, Democrats and⁤ their corporate media​ cheering section have been consistent in alleging that Republicans were going to attempt to steal the 2024 election. Indeed the first anniversary of the⁣ Jan. 6 Capitol riot, which has ‌now assumed the nature of a‌ Democrat⁤ holy day​ — was ‍the occasion ​for a series of ⁣articles in outlets such as The⁢ New York Times, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, The Guardian, and New York magazine that ​centered on unhinged scaremongering about alleged plots for a‌ GOP coup. That was the ​background for the Democrats’ Jan.‍ 6 Committee dog-and-pony show, when blame for the riot expanded from the participants to‍ more ‌or less every ​Republican⁤ who voiced doubts about the count in a 2020 election in which the normal guardrails for​ voter integrity had been⁣ discarded during the Covid panic.

But as Trump and the Republicans have learned in the last year, the hyperbole about defending democracy wasn’t just disingenuous. It was also a ⁤matter ⁣of projection. ‍Democrats have unleashed a far-ranging lawfare campaign aimed at throwing Trump off the ballot and convicting him on an array of bogus crimes. In New York state, a bizarre lawsuit has used a legitimate real ‌estate transaction ⁣as the excuse ⁢for a case in which a partisan judge ⁣and legal‍ system seeks to destroy Trump’s ⁢family business and confiscate his wealth in a​ manner reminiscent of banana republic proscriptions.

If Democrats⁣ didn’t blush at the use of such naked authoritarian tactics — New York Gov. Kathy Hochul even said​ the quiet part out loud when she ​assured other business owners that they needn’t fear being the ⁤victims of a ‍similarly ‍arbitrary prosecution because it could only be ⁣applied to Trump — what would prevent​ them from trying‌ to overturn an election they‍ lost to the former president?

They have good‍ reason to fear a Trump victory. ⁢With Biden’s favorability ratings at a historical low for an incumbent seeking reelection and ‍Trump leading him in the RealClearPolitics average ‍of surveys of‌ head-to-head matchups and in ​polls with third-party candidates included, the president is in‌ big trouble.

How⁣ to Stop Trump

That’s the ‌backdrop for a revealing piece in The Atlantic about⁣ how Democrats can stop another Trump presidency even if the voters choose him.

The excuse for doing so will be to ​assert the argument being made by Colorado when it tried to throw Trump off the ⁢ballot‍ in that state: that his alleged status as an insurrectionist makes him ineligible to be president.

According to Atlantic staff writer Russell Berman, the key to overturning a Trump victory at the ballot ⁢box is for the Democrats to ‍win back control of Congress, the odds for which, even in the event of a Trump presidential win, must be assessed as at least even.⁢ If they do, then the stage is set for a Jan. 6 rerun, this‍ time with the Democrats voting not to certify the Electoral College results.

1988 was the last time Democrats accepted ⁢a presidential election loss⁣ without attempting to ⁣overturn the results. Since then, every Republican victory,​ including​ George W. Bush’s decisive 2004 ⁢win, has been questioned by both Democrat politicians and conspiracy theorists on the left. ⁤Indeed ‌Democratic Rep. Jamie ⁢Raskin, ‌who voted not to certify Trump’s win in⁢ 2016 and then treated‍ Republicans who did the ‍same four‍ years later as ​traitors, said he might‍ be willing to ‌consider decertifying a Trump win in 2024 if​ that’s what will happen.

It’s ​true that some of the most notoriously partisan Democrats such as Reps. Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell told Berman that ⁢would‌ be a bridge too far for‍ them. But even discounting their unwillingness to show their hand this far in advance, it’s important to⁤ take into⁢ account factors that Berman didn’t even bother ⁤mentioning.

A Trump victory would almost certainly set off bloody riots in every American city in the manner of the “mostly peaceful” Black Lives Matter riots of ⁢the summer​ of 2020. If anything, the ​next round of ⁣left-wing violence⁢ might be even worse. But no matter ​how much America burns following a Trump win on Nov. 5, 2024, you can count on Washington to be swarming with angry leftists and liberals next‍ January⁣ in ​a manner to put the “Stop the Steal” rally MAGA demonstrators of 2021 to shame.

The‌ pressure​ on Democratic politicians to stop⁣ the‌ Electoral College results ⁤from being certified would ⁣be far greater than the desultory protests that Trump ‍supporters put together to head off a Biden presidency. The entire left-wing​ intersectional ⁣activist ⁢wing of the party will know that another Trump presidency‍ could begin⁣ the process of rolling back the tide of ‍woke control​ of the government and American society. That factor alone,‍ along with the visceral hatred for Trump and his working-class ⁣fans, will generate the kind of mass demonstrations that ​will be impossible for Democrat ⁢members of Congress to⁢ ignore.

Constitutional Crisis

Should they vote⁤ not to certify the election that Trump had won, that would create a murky constitutional debate about ‍what follows, ⁢but the effect would be the same as an Electoral ​College tie, addressed⁣ in the 12th Amendment, and ‌would likely mean the election would be ‌thrown to the House of Representatives for a decision.

There, each state delegation would⁣ have one vote to decide the presidency, something that ‌has​ only happened after the 1800 and 1824 elections. The House would be limited in their choices to those who ‌won Electoral College votes, but at that point, the result might be political chaos, since ​Electoral College members would have been free to vote as they liked.

There is also the ‌possibility that the House wouldn’t be ⁤able to resolve the impasse before Jan. 21, when ⁤a president ⁤must be sworn in. In that case, the Senate would elect a‌ vice president who would serve as president. There again, a Democratic majority could elect Biden ‌or his running mate. But the wording of the 12th‌ Amendment, which says that “no person constitutionally ineligible to⁣ the office of President shall be eligible to that of ‍Vice-President of the United States,” raises⁢ the possibility of them choosing someone who had not been on the ballot, such as fantasy league options like Michelle Obama. Like virtually everything⁢ that would ⁤happen once the ‌existing system failed to produce a result, it would also mean subsequent court challenges to resolve the meaning⁣ of the text, which,⁤ like the Democrats’‌ attempt to use the 14th Amendment to ‍stop Trump, is something the ⁣courts ‍have never‌ fully adjudicated.

At⁢ this moment,​ it’s just one ⁢scenario that the political left is contemplating. But‌ it would ⁢be foolish to ⁤dismiss the possibility of it becoming reality, especially when one ​considers the underhanded and authoritarian tactics Democrats have already ⁢employed to take out Trump in the courts.

Not unreasonably, Republican voters fear that should the current polling averages hold and a ‌Trump victory actually happen, ​the Democrat ⁣Party⁢ and left-wing media would be⁣ willing ‍to back any scheme that would allow‍ them ⁤to retain power, ‌notwithstanding their rhetoric about Republicans who challenged the 2020 vote. Democrats know the courts won’t let‌ them get their way on preventing Trump from​ being ⁣on the ballot and worry that their ‍bogus lawfare trials against him either ‍won’t succeed in jailing ⁣him in time or will be ignored by voters who‌ understand undemocratic ⁢behavior when they see it. If they do control Congress‌ in January,​ the ‌chances of them using that power to undo an election loss to​ Trump seems like the safest possible bet.


rnrn

What potential constitutional crisis could arise if Vice ⁢President Kamala Harris were elevated to the presidency⁣ regardless ⁣of‌ the election outcome?

D potentially elevate Vice President Kamala Harris ⁢to the presidency,‍ regardless of the outcome of the election.

This scenario presents a‍ constitutional crisis of ‍unprecedented proportions.‍ It would undermine ‌the very⁣ foundations of democracy and the peaceful transfer of power‌ that the United States has long held as a fundamental principle.‌ It would further deepen the already sharp political divide ​in the country and⁤ could ⁤have dire ‌consequences⁣ for the future of American governance.

The fact that Democrats are even considering such a plan is deeply troubling. It reveals a dangerous disregard for the democratic process and a willingness to⁢ manipulate the system to achieve their ‍desired outcome. While Democrats have‌ long accused ⁢Republicans of undermining democracy, they are now ​showing a willingness⁣ to do the‌ same in order to maintain their grip on power.

Furthermore, the media’s role in perpetuating these narratives and fueling the lawfare campaign against Trump cannot be overstated. They have consistently ‍framed the 2024 election as a battle for the soul of democracy, painting Trump and‌ his supporters as existential threats. This kind‍ of fear-mongering only​ serves to deepen divisions and erode trust in our democratic institutions.

It is ​imperative that Americans⁤ remain ⁤vigilant and ⁢refuse to allow partisan interests⁤ to ⁣override the principles of democracy. The​ idea that a political party would seek to overturn the⁤ results of a free and fair election is deeply‍ troubling and‍ should be condemned. We must stand up⁤ for the integrity of our electoral process and reject any attempts to subvert it for political gain.

In the end, ⁤the‍ fate of the 2024 election⁤ rests in the hands of⁣ the American people. It is⁤ up to us to ensure that our voices are heard ‌and​ that our votes are respected. We must reject any attempts​ to undermine the will⁢ of the ‍people and fight to preserve the integrity of our democratic institutions. Only then can we ‌truly claim to be a nation of, ​by, and for the people.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker