Elon Musk, others warn: DEI in Medicine endangers loved ones!
Concerns Raised Over Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Medicine
Multiple political commentators and influential figures have expressed deep concern following the shocking revelations made by Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro about diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the medical field. Shapiro’s findings, shared in a widely viewed thread, shed light on how some medical schools and doctors prioritize DEI over merit, potentially compromising patient safety.
Shapiro’s thread, which has garnered over three million views, has been widely shared by prominent individuals such as Elon Musk, Mark Levin, and Sage Steele. Musk, in particular, emphasized the grave consequences of DEI, stating that it puts the lives of loved ones at risk.
DEI puts the lives of your loved ones at risk https://t.co/dV6l3MCOPd
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 26, 2024
Sage Steele, who previously sued ESPN for alleged retaliation, expressed her concern over the prioritization of DEI over qualifications in hiring decisions. Mark Levin condemned the impact of DEI on the medical system, calling it the destruction caused by “Democrat bigots and racists.”
While some may find Shapiro’s revelations shocking, commentator Dave Rubin stated that they were not surprising, highlighting the dangerous consequences of DEI.
Shapiro’s thread begins by discussing the case of Kychelle Del Rosario, a Wake Forest medical student who injured a patient after the patient mocked her pronoun pin. Shapiro reveals that Del Rosario’s actions were defended by fellow student Ewen Liu, who has since been hired by UPenn Health. Shapiro criticizes the attempts made by both Wake Forest and UPenn to conceal Liu’s hiring.
Furthermore, Shapiro shares a video of Duke surgical resident Vignesh Raman, who discusses Duke University’s efforts to reduce the number of white men in surgery. Raman admits that Duke has abandoned traditional metrics and adopted a holistic approach to recruit more women and non-white surgeons.
6/ Raman adds that post-George Floyd, Duke made a concerted effort to stop hiring so many “walls of white men.” He says the team is now “abandoning … all sort[s] of metrics” and adopting a “completely holistic” application practice in order to recruit more women and non-white… pic.twitter.com/Jxo93giLoQ
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) February 26, 2024
Shapiro also highlights the American College of Surgeons’ definition of “racism,” which implies that it is impossible to be racist against white people. He further exposes instances where surgeons receive grants and awards based on their minority status.
These revelations have sparked concerns about the prioritization of DEI over qualifications and merit in the medical field, potentially compromising patient safety and the integrity of the profession.
10/ This is now the prevailing view in surgical medicine. At a recent conference on DEI at UPenn, where Ewen Liu now works, one surgeon says that it’s “off putting” that so many surgeons are white men. pic.twitter.com/S1wIdWLfmF
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) February 26, 2024
Is there a risk of bias or suppression of certain topics or perspectives in medical research as a result of prioritizing DEI, and if so, how does it impact scientific progress and the integrity of the medical profession
Ics the decision to hire Liu, suggesting that it was based on his support for DEI rather than his qualifications and competence as a medical professional.
The thread goes on to discuss several other cases of alleged prioritization of DEI over merit in the medical field. Shapiro highlights instances where medical schools have implemented changes in their admissions processes, such as removing standardized testing requirements, in an effort to increase diversity. He argues that these changes may result in the admission of less qualified individuals, ultimately compromising the quality of care provided to patients.
Furthermore, Shapiro raises concerns about the impact of DEI on medical research, pointing out that certain topics or perspectives may be suppressed or biased in order to align with certain ideological narratives. He argues that this not only hinders scientific progress but also undermines the credibility and integrity of the medical profession.
The thread also addresses the issue of affirmative action in medical school admissions, suggesting that it may lead to the acceptance of less-qualified individuals based on their race or ethnicity, rather than their abilities and qualifications. Shapiro argues that this approach perpetuates discrimination and fails to address the root causes of underrepresentation in the medical field.
In response to Shapiro’s thread, several medical professionals and organizations have voiced their support for DEI initiatives in medicine. They argue that diversity in the medical field is essential for providing culturally competent and equitable care to all patients. They emphasize the importance of addressing historical inequities and barriers to access in order to create a more inclusive and representative healthcare system.
However, critics of DEI initiatives in medicine argue that while diversity is important, it should not come at the expense of merit and patient safety. They advocate for a balanced approach that values both diversity and competence, ensuring that qualified individuals from all backgrounds have equal opportunities while maintaining high standards of medical care.
The debate over diversity, equity, and inclusion in medicine is an ongoing and complex one. It raises important questions about how to create a healthcare system that is both diverse and competent, while ensuring the highest quality of care for all patients. It is crucial for all stakeholders to engage in open and constructive dialogue to address these concerns and work towards a more equitable and inclusive medical field.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
