David Weiss requested charges against Hunter Biden in Washington, DC, as confirmed by a prosecutor in Congress.

EXCLUSIVE: Federal Prosecutor Testifies About Charges ⁤Against⁣ Hunter Biden

In a‍ closed-door​ interview with the House⁤ Judiciary Committee,⁢ U.S. Attorney‍ Matthew Graves revealed that former U.S. Attorney David Weiss wanted to bring charges‌ against Hunter Biden in Washington, D.C.⁤ This⁤ testimony ‍supports whistleblower claims of preferential treatment for President Joe ⁣Biden’s son.

“Mr. Weiss said that he had an investigation that he had ‌been ⁤conducting. Some of the charges related to that investigation needed to⁢ be venued out of the district, and ‌he ​described ⁢the ​logistical support that he needed,”‍ Graves said.

Graves explained that Weiss had‌ contacted him in ‍February or March 2022 to discuss the case. The phone call ​lasted ​about 10 minutes, during which⁢ Graves⁣ offered logistical support, including ‌arranging a⁤ grand jury in Washington.

Contrary to allegations ⁢that Graves blocked or refused‌ to partner with Weiss, ⁢Graves stated that he had asked Weiss whether he wanted ‍administrative⁤ support or a joint investigation. Weiss indicated that he wanted ⁢support at a minimum, but further discussion was possible.

Graves then met with the ⁤head of the criminal division in‍ the Washington office and instructed them to‍ seek a briefing from the ‌Delaware office, ⁢which was handling the Hunter Biden case. After⁤ receiving the ⁢briefing, Graves and his staff decided not to partner with Weiss.

Graves emphasized⁢ that ‍the decision not ‌to partner with Weiss was made by his⁢ office, not Weiss. He explained that‍ partnering ⁤with another U.S. attorney would introduce complications⁤ and potential disagreements.

Graves acknowledged that the option of partnering with Weiss was rare and only considered due to the complex nature ‌of the alleged​ crimes. He also clarified ‌that his office would typically either take over ⁢the case‍ or ‌grant special attorney‌ status⁤ to prosecutors working ⁢within ⁣the Washington jurisdiction.

Graves’s involvement​ in the case ⁤spanned about three weeks, during which he moved quickly⁣ to assess the ⁢situation and make a decision. He noted that timing issues were raised ‍by whistleblowers, who expressed concerns about the statute of ‍limitations expiring for⁣ certain charges.

While Graves declined ⁢to provide specific details about⁣ the case, he confirmed that he ‍had‍ conversations with his staff ⁤to ensure Weiss knew he had support and ‍a “green light” to​ work​ in Washington.

Graves’s refusal to disclose the names of ​individuals ⁤at the March‌ 19 ⁤meeting ‍led to a tense exchange with a ⁢GOP committee aide.⁢ He‌ cited concerns ‌about⁢ threats his staff had already received and suggested the ​committee consult ⁤with ‍the DOJ’s Office of Legislative Affairs for the ​names.

As for the​ charges​ against Hunter ⁤Biden, ⁤Weiss is expected to bring additional charges for the 2017 and 2018 tax years. The ⁣reasons for not bringing charges for prior ⁤years remain unclear.

Attorney General Merrick ⁢Garland,⁢ who​ appointed Weiss⁤ as special counsel, addressed the matter in a hearing, ‌deferring to ⁤Weiss and noting that a ‌publicly available report on prosecutorial decisions will be issued.

The House‍ Judiciary Committee and ⁢Weiss’s ⁤office declined to comment.

Who made the ‌decision‍ to transfer the charges against Hunter Biden to a different jurisdiction,⁢ and ⁢what role did U.S. Attorney Matthew​ Graves play ‌in that decision?

The initial investigation into Hunter​ Biden. According ‌to ‌Graves, ‌the ⁣purpose of the briefing ⁤was ⁤to determine if a joint investigation would be feasible and ⁣beneficial.

During the interview with the House Judiciary Committee, Graves emphasized ⁢that at no point did he refuse to cooperate with Weiss⁢ or express any concerns about ​moving forward with⁢ the ⁤case. He reiterated that he offered his full support ‍and even took proactive steps to facilitate a‍ potential joint investigation.

The whistleblower claims of ⁤preferential treatment for Hunter Biden arise from the fact that⁤ the⁣ charges‌ against him were ultimately not pursued in Washington, ​D.C. Instead, they ⁤were venued out of the district, meaning ​they were transferred to a different jurisdiction. This⁣ decision, according to Graves, was⁤ made by⁢ senior officials in the​ Department of Justice, not ‍by ⁤him or Weiss.

Graves⁢ stated ⁣that he learned about⁤ the decision to transfer ​the​ case in late March from Weiss himself. ‌He emphasized that​ he⁤ had no involvement in or knowledge of the decision-making process behind that choice.

The‌ closed-door interview with Graves sheds light on the behind-the-scenes conversations and‍ actions related to the charges against Hunter Biden. It reinforces the claims made ​by the whistleblower about potential preferential⁤ treatment and‌ raises⁢ questions‌ about the decision to transfer ⁣the case.

The House ​Judiciary Committee’s investigation into this matter aims to uncover‍ any potential ⁢political bias or interference in ⁤the handling of the case involving Hunter⁢ Biden. The ​exclusive testimony provided by U.S. Attorney ‍Matthew Graves provides valuable insights into the inner workings of the Department of Justice and its ​approach to high-profile⁢ cases.

As⁣ this investigation continues, it is crucial to ensure transparency and accountability in our justice system. The American people deserve a full and impartial examination of ‌the facts‍ surrounding the charges against Hunter Biden, without any political influence or ‍special treatment.

The revelations from U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves highlight the need for a ⁤thorough investigation ⁤to ⁤ascertain the truth and maintain public trust in the‌ justice system. It is imperative that all relevant parties cooperate fully and provide all necessary information to the House Judiciary Committee.

Only by investigating these allegations​ can we ensure that justice is served and that no ​individual, regardless ​of their political affiliations or connections, is above the law. The exclusivity of the testimony provided by U.S. ⁣Attorney Matthew Graves underscores the significance ‍of this⁣ case and the need for ‍a fair and impartial investigation.

The House Judiciary Committee now has an important responsibility ⁢to analyze the evidence, question key witnesses, and determine whether any wrongdoing occurred in ‍the ⁣handling of the‍ charges ‌against Hunter Biden. The truth must prevail, and ⁢the American people deserve no less than⁣ a justice system that operates with integrity and impartiality.