the bongino report

Crazy Maxine Waters Goes After Manchin and Sinema

Representative Maxine Waters took a shot at two Democrat Senators — Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin — suggesting they “don’t give a darn” About police reform.

Waters (D-CA) isn’t intellectually equipped to be subtle, making her comments an obvious attempt to use the recent tragic police-involved death of Tyre Nichols to put emotional pressure on her colleagues to end the filibuster.

“We keep fighting, we keep begging, we keep doing everything that we possibly can,” Waters said during an appearance on MSNBC’s “Symone,” Adding police reform had not worked because “we don’t have enough members who care enough about this issue.”

“When you look at even two Democrats — Manchin of course, and of course that woman from Arizona — they don’t give a darn about this issue,” She asserted.

“They would rather have the power to determine what happens in the Senate by using their two votes for themselves than anything else.”

[embedded content]

RELATED: Tim Scott Slams Democrats For Using ‘Racist’ Filibuster to Block His Polic Reforms Now Being ‘Embraced’ By Biden

Maxine Waters Swipes at Sinema & Manchin Over Police Reform

Maxine Waters’ argument is an odd flex considering Democrats actually The filibuster was used 2020: To block Senator Tim Scott’s (R-SC) efforts to reform police forces

“The fact is Democrats used a filibuster they call racist to block my reforms that they’re now embracing,” Scott stated that in a statement made at the time.

Scott’s proposal sought to promote minority hiring within police departments, implement a database to hold bad cops accountable, and would restrict chokeholds.

Yes, Democrats Did Use the filibuster – something they now say is a tool of ‘white nationalists‘ and a ‘Jim crow relic‘ – to block it. The same filibuster Waters suggests shows members of her own party don’Police reform is not important to them.

Manchin (D.W.Va) was among a few Democrats who participated in the election. Voted to start the debate on Scott’s police reform bill, but ultimately came up short because they needed 60 votes to overcome the filibuster.

Waters should have been praising Waters for his move.

RELATED: Maxine Waters Confronts Police who Stop Black Driver

Waters’ History of Anti-Police Rhetoric

Maxine Waters isn’t necessarily interested in meaningful police reform, as much as she’s out to make sure the police as an entire entity pay for the sins of those who betrayed their oath to serve and protect in Memphis.

Waters were suggested for June 2020 It was not enough to reform the police These are the steps to take to get rid of them “racist, ignorant, [and] stupid cops” and their unions, too.

She would Later, you can claim this Policing as a matter of its nature “is racism.”

“This justice system is broken,” Waters said. “It has never really been in our favor, and it has basically been responsible for ensuring that we could never ever get beyond this suppression and this oppression that has been forced upon us for so many years.”

“‘Something is wrong with our policing,’” She claimed that was the message of rioters at the moment. “It is racism.”

Waters was confronted by police following a traffic stop in which a black driver was involved in 2020. He pulled over to ensure that the officers were on their feet.

“They stopped a brother so I stopped to see what they were doing,” Waters said.

In a speech delivered on the House floor last year, Mondaire Jones, a far-left Democrat representative, spoke out. Senators are referred to as Who voted against the change to filibuster rules including Sinema or Manchin as “white nationalists.”

According to Jones and Waters, the filibuster is a pro-police racist tool. Except when it is used by their party.

This is the right time to support and share those sources you trust.
The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”


Read More From Original Article Here:

" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker