Corrupt New York Times Freaks Out Over Gas Stoves, Downplays Poisonous Chemical Spill In Ohio  

There is perhaps no better example of how disingenuous and inconsistent our corporate press is than the comparison between The New York Times’ take on gas stoves vs. the fiery derailment of a train carrying toxic chemicals along the Ohio-Pennsylvania line in East Palestine, Ohio, last week. The press claims that gas stoves can be dangerous and extremely hazardous. However, a chemical leak equivalent to a World War I-era biological weapon is perfectly safe.

“Gas stoves have ignited a debate in Washington, as mounting evidence shows potential health risks including a link to childhood asthma,” Reads The New York Times published an article last month. The column was one of many published by corporate media at Democrats’ request to fan the flames amidst the hysteria over gas stoves.

Richard Trumka Jr., United States Consumer Product Safety Commission, began advocating for the ban on gas stoves in December. Phone It “a real possibility” That Could If there is enough public pressure, it can happen quickly. There was an immediate outpouring of support. studies The following are the “science” Democrat lawmakers started to discredit every reason gas stoves can be dangerous and began to throw out all possible explanations. “gas stoves cause brain damage” To “gas stoves are racist.” 

Gas stove panic is upon us Science has nothing to do. It’s wrapped up in a massive tyrannical power grab cloaked in environmentalism, and those who want your gas stove won’t stop there; they want to ban All gas-powered appliances.

Although there weren’t any negatives to banning gas stoves, the media ignored them. Instead, they gleefully defended Trumka’s proposal and worked to convince the public that their gas stoves are an environmental and health liability. The media quickly reversed their course. Assuring People believed there would not be a ban and that the entire thing was legal. “right-wing culture war” The White House pulled out of the proposal at the last minute.

Naturally, when duty called for the media to downplay an actual health crisis — the chemical spill in Ohio — they obliged. The EPA evacuated East Palestine after the freight train exploded with toxic chemicals. They also burned the contamination, creating a mushroom cloud. hazardous chemicals To plume in the area.

The EPA advised citizens to go home two days after the fire and to continue breathing the air and drinking the water. However, residents reported feeling headaches and irritation in their eyes after returning home to find countless dead and dying wildlife, pets, or fish.

It’s fair to say that the whole situation was handled disastrously and likely because the climate fanatics working at EPA don’t really care about the environment. Their time and money is spent on other things. “climate change,” This translates into gas stove bans Thermostats The government has the authority to regulate them. In fact, climate change hysterics have many uses. Making money Centralizing state power. A chemical spillage affecting the natural environment and health is not a problem in tiny villages across America.

“I’m asking they trust the government,”  EPA’s administrator, Michael Regan. “Trust the government” The New York Times also has the exact same message. “After a train carrying toxic