Choosing embryo creation over marriage is a dangerous and catastrophic choice
Outsourcing Reproduction: The Dangerous Trend of Embryo Freezing
For years, women have been deceived by pop culture, celebrities, and even college ads that freezing their eggs and using a third party to fertilize them later is “empowering” and that delaying or eliminating marriage is the best choice. However, this latest trend of embryo freezing between unmarried couples perpetuates the false notion that parenthood is oppression unless it’s on your terms. But the reality is, it comes with serious consequences.
In a disturbing new article, The Cut explores the lives of several women who, in their later reproductive years, became desperate for motherhood and a sign of commitment from their boyfriends. They created embryos with men they weren’t married to, only to face heartbreak and uncertainty.
The article primarily aims to condemn the Alabama Supreme Court’s embryo ruling, but it inadvertently proves that the American assisted reproductive technology industry, which allows anyone with money to participate, does more harm than good.
First Comes Love, Then Comes … Outsourced Reproduction?
The article begins with Jennifer’s story. At her boyfriend’s request, they decided to combine DNA and create life. Instead of getting married, they spent $20,000 on IVF and froze the resulting embryos. However, Jennifer soon discovered her boyfriend’s infidelity. Despite this, she continued with the procedure and ended up with 20 embryos.
Two years later, the couple split, and their unborn babies were sentenced to death. This highlights the dangerous trend of using embryo freezing as a substitute for commitment.
Baby Blues
IVF and embryo freezing between unmarried parties may be trendy, but it’s a dangerous and unethical arrangement. It not only leaves women heartbroken when relationships end but also causes immense pain and often death to the innocent children created and destroyed in the process.
Even if women like Jennifer decide to implant some of their embryos and raise children as single parents, these children are at a physical, emotional, and educational disadvantage compared to those raised by their married biological parents. Fatherless homes, in particular, have negative impacts on children’s academic success.
It’s backward to spend thousands of dollars creating life in a lab instead of committing to marriage. Yet, our culture has bought into this lie. Furthermore, the global assisted reproductive technology industry continues to profit from embryo custody battles and the destruction of unborn children.
How does the commodification of reproduction through embryo freezing impact the concept of parenthood and the importance of family
A child and turned to embryo freezing as a last resort. While the initial idea may seem like a logical solution to the problem of age-related infertility, the article highlights the dangers and ethical issues surrounding this practice.
Embryo freezing involves the extraction of eggs from a woman’s ovaries, which are then fertilized with sperm and frozen for later use. This allows women to delay pregnancy until a time when they feel ready. However, this process is not without risks. The women interviewed in The Cut article shared stories of intense physical and emotional pain during the extraction process and the subsequent implantation of the frozen embryos.
The physical toll of embryo freezing is just the tip of the iceberg. The emotional toll on these women is often overlooked. Many of them expressed feelings of guilt, regret, and emptiness as they embarked on a journey to become mothers without a partner by their side. Society may portray this as an empowering choice, but in reality, it can lead to isolation and a deep sense of longing for a traditional family structure.
Furthermore, the practice of embryo freezing raises ethical questions. By freezing embryos, we are essentially putting potential human lives on hold. These embryos have the potential to develop into fully-formed individuals, yet they are left in a state of suspended animation. Is this fair to the embryos themselves? And what are the long-term consequences of freezing and thawing embryos?
Another concerning aspect of this trend is the commodification of reproduction. By outsourcing the fertilization process to a third party, we are reducing the act of conception to a transaction. This not only detracts from the intimacy and emotional connection of creating a child, but it also raises the possibility of exploitation and unethical practices within the fertility industry.
Ultimately, the trend of embryo freezing perpetuates a distorted view of parenthood. It suggests that having a child should be solely on one’s own terms, without the need for a committed relationship or the challenges that come with raising a child as a couple. This undermines the importance of family and the role that both parents play in a child’s life.
As a society, we should be questioning the motives behind this trend and the potential consequences for individuals and families. Instead of promoting embryo freezing as a viable option for women who wish to delay motherhood, we should focus on creating a support system that encourages healthy relationships, genuine connections, and a realistic understanding of the joys and challenges of parenthood.
Parenthood is not a transaction; it is a profound and life-altering experience that should be approached with thoughtfulness and commitment. The dangerous trend of embryo freezing threatens to further distance us from the true meaning of parenthood and the importance of human connection. It is time that we reevaluate our priorities and seek solutions that prioritize the well-being of individuals, relationships, and families.
In conclusion, the practice of embryo freezing may seem like a solution to age-related infertility, but it comes with serious consequences. The physical and emotional toll on women, the ethical considerations, and the distortion of parenthood all warrant a critical examination. It is time we question the societal pressures that drive this trend and instead promote a holistic and thoughtful approach to reproduction and family-building.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
