Comey asks court to dismiss ’86 47′ seashell case
Former FBI Director James Comey has requested a federal judge to dismiss charges related to an indictment by the Trump governance over a social media post. Comey posted a photo of seashells arranged in the pattern “86 47,” which the goverment claims was a threat against President Trump, interpreted as an alleged call for his assassination. Comey’s attorneys argue that the message was not a true threat but rather political hyperbole, with the phrase “86” meaning “get rid of” or “eject,” and “47” referring to Trump as the 47th President. Thay contend that no reasonable observer would see the post as violent or threatening. Comey had taken down the post after the controversy and the Secret Service investigation. He denies any wrongdoing and faces two charges for threatening the president. The case marks Comey’s second indictment during Trump’s presidency, with the first being dismissed. His lawyers also argue that prosecuting him infringes on his First Amendment rights, emphasizing that the seashells were arranged by someone else, indicating political expression rather than a personal threat.
Former FBI Director James Comey asked a federal judge on Monday to dismiss the Trump administration’s indictment over his social media post featuring seashells in the shape of “86 47,” an apparent threat against the president, as alleged by the Department of Justice.
The defendant’s lawyers insisted the controversial post did not constitute a “true threat” against President Donald Trump and that it was “mere political hyperbole” instead.
Recommended Stories
Trump has interpreted “86 47” messages as open calls for his assassination, but Comey denies that was his intention.
“To justify this prosecution, the indictment alleges that Mr. Comey’s ‘86 47’ post constitutes a ‘true threat’ on the President’s life. That claim is contradicted by every possible source of meaning: dictionaries, context, precedent, and common sense,” Comey’s attorneys wrote in a supplementary document accompanying their motion to dismiss.
“‘86’ simply means ‘get rid of’ or ‘eject’ and has no violent connotation except in the most uncommon usages. Most dictionaries do not even list the meaning—’to kill’—that the government now proposes. And when combined with “47”—slang for President Trump, the forty-seventh President—’86’ becomes nothing more than a call to oppose President Trump,” they said. “Thus, in this context, no reasonable observer would understand the phrase ‘86 47’ to connote violence at all—let alone to threaten that Mr. Comey personally would commit violence against the President.”
The motion was submitted in the Eastern District of North Carolina, where Comey allegedly snapped a photo of the seashells while he was walking along the beach last year. He later deleted the post after the numbers sparked controversy, prompting an investigation by the Secret Service.
Comey has denied any wrongdoing in the matter. He faces two charges for threatening the president.
The federal case marks the second time that the former FBI director has been indicted during Trump’s second term. The first indictment, filed over Comey’s alleged obstruction of Congress, was dismissed by a federal judge in the Eastern District of Virginia last year. It remains to be seen whether the federal judge in North Carolina will dismiss the second indictment.
BLANCHE SAYS IT WAS ‘NOT JUST’ COMEY’S ’86 47′ SEASHELL POST THAT LED TO INDICTMENT
In the court document, Comey’s attorneys make the case that the federal government’s criminal prosecution of their client is violating his free speech rights under the First Amendment. They noted he merely posted the image of the seashells, which were arranged in the “86 47” formation by the time Comey got to the beach. This indicates another person made the political statement.
“Forcing Mr. Comey to stand trial for a statement opposing the President—even if he is ultimately acquitted—would itself be an unconstitutional punishment of free speech,” the lawyers wrote. “And it would invite future prosecutions by the Executive Branch against perceived political enemies for their opposition to the President.”
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
