Collision Course: How An Explosion In Artificial Intelligence Could Threaten Human Agency
As Artificial Intelligence continues to expand its role in our daily lives, experts are now concerned about the future of human agency and our simple decision-making processes — and a phenomenon uniquely American could catapult us into that future quicker than we realize.
The Pew Research Center and Elon University’s Imagining the Internet Center sought the opinions of many different kinds of experts — all of which have expertise with automation as it relates to their occupation — on the extent to which we will have control in tech-aided decisions.
The Pew survey The following was a survey of 540 developers, policy specialists, and academics:
“By 2035, will smart machines, bots and systems powered by artificial intelligence be designed to allow humans to easily be in control of most tech-aided decision-making that is relevant to their lives?”
These are the results from this informal canvassing.
- 56% of the experts didn’t agree with the assertion that technology-aided decision-making will continue to be controlled by humans.
- 44% of respondents agreed that technology-aided decision-making will continue to be controlled by human beings.
The report also features written responses from hundreds of survey respondents — most concerned with the encroachment of AI on human agency.
“Looking at the studies on human factors, human systems integration, etc., humans become pretty lazy when it comes to being vigilant over the technology,” Heather Roff (nonresident fellow at Brookings Institution in law, policy and ethics of new military technologies and senior research scientist at University of Colorado Boulder) said these words. “Humans’ cognitive systems are just not geared to ‘think like’ these systems. So, when one has a lack of literacy and a lazy attitude toward the use of such systems, bad things tend to happen.”
Roff’s remarks are a great indicator of the quality of her cohort. Both the speed and complexity of AI’s abilities to make decision are evidenced by Roff’s comments. “under the hood” The algorithms encourage both greater reliance and less concern about how technology works.
Lea Schlanger is a North American senior intelligence analyst. She says that social impact won’t be a priority due to the pace of AI advancement. She stated that “Advancements in AI and machine learning automation are currently happening faster than research on the impacts they’ll have on society as a whole.”
However, people who think that AI advances will not diminish human agency argue that AI will never take away the decision-making power of humans.
“Although many important decisions will be made by autonomous and artificial intelligence, they will be willingly delegated to non-human intelligence, but we will still keep the decision of what decisions to offload to ourselves,” Chris Labash was an associate professor in the department of communication and innovations at Carnegie Mellon University.
Labash’s side was united by the belief that AI would be limited in its role in technology-aided decision-making due to market forces. Many argue that humans have evolved over time with technological advances.
The themes that respondents are less optimistic about AI’s potential role in human agency raise more concerns than their counterparts.
Reporters who disapproved with the survey question found a consistent theme: Very powerful actors have little incentive to honour human agency. They are also aware of the human desire for convenience. “black box” Complex AIs use these operations.
Could there be an external social force that prompts us to surrender more of our agency to AI, particularly in Western cultures?
Agency refers to our capacity to make decisions. Over the past decades, West culture has produced so many options that it has earned the title agency. “overchoice.”
The Decision Lab is an innovative applied research firm that specializes in behavioral science. defines Overchoice “how people get overwhelmed when they are presented with a large number of options to choose from.”
Nowadays, we have almost unlimited options in all aspects of our lives. This includes finding a partner on dating apps, streaming movies or shows, job search engines, house and apartment searches on property websites, streaming music, and many other areas. Overchoice refers to taking a chance in every aspect of your life, including choosing which songs we want, or where you would like to live.
Barry Schwartz was the author of this book. “The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less,” He examines what happens when you are presented with too many options. He said When faced with an overwhelming number of options, there are generally two things.
First, decision paralysis. There are many options, and people will be less inclined to participate in the same activity.
People are less satisfied with the choices they make if there is too much choice than if there were fewer options. Schwartz says that there can be a sense of regret because the decision-maker is responsible for more of it. Schwartz also suggests that there may always be the possibility of making a better choice.
The technology is advancing rapidly, and AI may make it easier to give decision-making power to AI. This could increase our chances of having more choice in all aspects of life.
Some streaming services have noticed that consumers are choosing too many products.
Netflix introduced the following features over the past few years: “Play Something” This feature uses machine learning. “There are times when we just don’t want to make decisions,” The feature’s About page says. “When you hit the ‘Play Something’ button, you’ll be instantly met with a series or film we know you’ll love based on what you’ve watched before.”
Spotify was the latest to roll out an AI system. Spotify has “DJAI is used to recommend music.
“The beauty of these experiences is our ability to deliver the right piece of music for that exact moment in time, and maybe even connect you with your next favorite artist in the process. We’re building on that innovation by harnessing the power of AI in an entirely new way,” The company said Make a statement.
Both systems work together to offer the most appropriate choice for their users. If you are faced with endless choices of music and tons of movies, it is worth letting the AI do the work for you. Imagine this way of thinking as AI grows its capabilities into other important aspects of your life.
The debate over how AI affects human agency is still ongoing between experts. The choice fatigue Westerners feel already suggests that they are better suited for AI-aided decisionmaking technology.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
“From Collision Course: How An Explosion In Artificial Intelligence Could Threaten Human Agency“
“The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author of the article and not necessarily shared or endorsed by Conservative News Daily”
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
