the epoch times

US accuses China of retaliating with Apple iPhone ban.

The White House Expresses Concern Over⁣ Beijing’s Reported iPhone Ban

The White House has raised concerns about ⁢reports that Beijing has ordered civil servants at certain government‍ agencies to stop bringing Apple’s iPhones to the offices. National Security Council spokesman John Kirby expressed his worries during a briefing, stating that this‍ action⁢ appears to be another example of China’s aggressive and‍ inappropriate retaliation against U.S. companies.⁢ Kirby called on ⁤Chinese authorities to​ be more transparent about their actions.

Related Stories

The White House’s comments came on the same day that ⁢Beijing made its first public response to the reported iPhone curbs. ⁢China’s foreign ministry spokeswoman, Mao⁤ Ning, denied issuing any official ban on foreign cellphones and mentioned “security‍ incidents” without providing further details.⁣ Mao emphasized China’s​ focus on ​cyber and information security, stating that phone companies ‍operating⁢ in China⁢ must adhere to the country’s⁣ laws and regulations.

Last week, The Wall Street Journal reported that Beijing had instructed‌ state‍ employees​ and officials ⁤at certain government agencies not to use iPhones‍ and other foreign cellphones for work. Local officials from three provinces confirmed this directive, ⁢stating that there were no formal ‍documents regarding the order. An employee from a sensitive government department in Shenzhen city revealed that foreign technology restrictions ⁢have been in place for a ‌year, with iPhones banned from important meetings.

CCP Tightens Control ⁤Over ​Population

Observers believe that Beijing’s​ move to ban iPhones is part​ of ‌the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) ongoing efforts ‌to ⁤tighten control over its​ people. ​The CCP ⁣has been encouraging official agencies and state companies to replace foreign technologies with domestic​ ones that they can control. This aligns with the‌ regime’s extensive investments in surveillance systems and its crackdown on both domestic and foreign businesses. ‍The CCP’s spending on societal control ⁤has even ‍surpassed its national‌ defense budget.

To further strengthen its​ control, some Chinese cities have started paying‌ government employees using⁤ digital ‌yuan, aiming for “ubiquitous digital ⁤monitoring.” President Joe Biden​ acknowledged that the restrictions⁣ on Western cellphones are ‍part of China’s attempts to change the rules of‌ the game. ‍However,‌ he denied the claim⁢ that the United States is isolating China and emphasized⁤ the need ⁢for fair trade practices.

Apple’s shares suffered declines ⁣in response to ⁣the iPhone ban reports, highlighting the risks for foreign businesses heavily reliant on the Chinese market. ⁤The⁢ timing of the potential ban coincides with ongoing discussions ​within ⁢the ‌Biden ⁤administration‌ regarding ⁣U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods. Analysts suggest that Beijing may view the iPhone ban as a bargaining chip to persuade the United States to ease these tariffs.

President Biden’s chief ‌trade official, Katherine ​Tai, has⁤ extended tariff exclusions on over 300 Chinese ⁤imports until the end of this year. The Office ‌of ​the U.S. Trade Representative is currently reviewing the Trump-era trade tariffs, with​ the results expected by the end of the year.

Cheng Jing, Yi Ru, and Wang Roux contributed to this report.

Are Chinese phones a security risk?

Chinese phones from OnePlus, Xiaomi, and Oppo are laced with spyware. Makers of the best Chinese Android smartphones collect an alarming​ amount​ of data that can be⁤ traced back to individuals, a new⁤ study ⁤indicates. ⁢Ent ⁣in Beijing said that workers were told ​to switch to Chinese-made smartphones for security reasons.

The reported ban​ has raised concerns among U.S. ​authorities regarding ⁣China’s treatment ​of American companies⁣ operating within its borders. This move by Beijing is seen as a retaliatory action against the ongoing trade⁣ tensions between the two countries.

The White House has been vocal ‍about its concerns over China’s ⁢unfair trade practices, ⁣intellectual property⁣ theft, and market restrictions faced by American businesses. The ⁤reported iPhone ban only exacerbates these concerns and further strains‌ the already fragile relationship between the two economic giants.

John Kirby, the National Security Council spokesman, emphasized the need for transparency from⁢ Chinese authorities‌ regarding their actions. The lack of clarity surrounding the reported⁤ ban raises‍ questions about China’s motives ‍and intentions. Kirby⁣ called on Beijing to provide more information ‌and explanation to address these concerns and ensure that any​ potential actions are based⁢ on legitimate reasons rather⁢ than being driven by political or economic motivations.

China’s foreign ministry⁢ spokeswoman,‍ Mao ​Ning, denied⁣ the existence ⁢of any ⁢official ban on foreign cellphones​ and mentioned “security incidents” without going into detail. While ​China’s focus on ‌cybersecurity ‍and information security is⁣ understandable, it is crucial for the government to provide a clear explanation of its actions and the specific ⁤security concerns⁤ that prompted the reported ban.

The reported iPhone ban comes at a time when the relationship between China and the United States‍ is already strained due to trade disputes and disagreements⁤ over various geopolitical issues.⁣ These actions not only harm American companies but also contribute to a broader environment of distrust and conflict between the two nations.

Apple, one of the most valuable companies globally, has faced significant challenges in the Chinese market due to‌ regulations ‍and competition from domestic companies. The reported ban on⁣ iPhones adds another ⁣hurdle for Apple, potentially ⁢impacting its market share and revenue in China.

It remains to be seen how the ⁣situation will evolve⁣ and whether China will provide more clarity and transparency⁢ regarding the ‍reported ban. ‌The‍ concern expressed by the White House highlights the importance of fair and equal treatment for all companies operating within any country’s borders. It is crucial ‍for governments to uphold international trade agreements and ensure that business operations ⁢are‍ not unduly influenced by political considerations.

As tensions ‌between ⁣the United States and China continue to escalate, it is imperative​ for both sides to engage in open and constructive dialogue to address their differences and⁢ find mutually beneficial solutions. The reported‍ iPhone ban serves as a reminder ⁤of the challenges faced when two economic ​superpowers‍ clash,⁢ and the need for effective communication and understanding between them.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker