Bob Casey criticizes his opponent’s wealthy donors, yet he embraces his own billionaire supporters
Senator Bob Casey’s Deep-Pocketed Supporters
Senator Bob Casey (Pa.) is quick to criticize his Republican challenger Dave McCormick for being funded by “right-wing billionaires.” However, it seems that Casey has his fair share of wealthy liberal supporters as well.
Notably, progressive billionaire George Soros and his son Alex each donated $6,600 to Casey’s campaign on Nov. 17, according to FEC records. Casey also received substantial contributions of $6,600 from Eric Schmidt, the billionaire co-founder of Google, and Reid Hoffman, the billionaire co-founder of LinkedIn, last year. Additionally, billionaire businesswoman Lynda Resnick, along with Hollywood luminaries Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg, have each contributed the maximum allowed donation of $6,600 to Casey under federal law.
Furthermore, Casey has received significant support from ultra-wealthy donors through political action committees. Alida Rockefeller Messinger, heiress to the Rockefeller family fortune, contributed $16,600 to Casey Keystone Victory PAC. Jay Pritzker, the billionaire governor of Illinois, donated $21,600 to the PAC, and Schmidt also contributed $6,600 to it. Even Melinda French Gates, worth an estimated $10 billion, gave $5,000 to Keystone America PAC.
These generous donations from wealthy individuals may undermine Casey’s attacks on McCormick’s funding sources. Casey has repeatedly criticized McCormick for being “funded by a small group of billionaires,” claiming that “right-wing billionaires” are supporting his opponent’s campaign. However, it appears that Casey himself has no shortage of deep-pocketed friends willing to fund his own operation.
Interestingly, Casey has often mingled with wealthy donors while championing a populist message on the campaign trail. Last year, he attended a fundraiser at New York City’s exclusive Harvard Club, hosted by Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer. Democratic megadonor Dennis Mehiel, who owns a superyacht, cohosted the event and contributed $3,800 to Casey’s campaign.
Despite his criticism of special interests and corporate influence in politics, Casey has received tens of thousands of dollars in contributions from lobbyists. Last year, he claimed to be “standing up to corporate interests” in a fundraising pitch. However, campaign finance disclosures reveal that numerous corporations and lobbyists have supported Casey’s campaign. According to the Washington Examiner, Casey received $60,000 in donations from lobbyists last year. It is worth noting that Casey’s brother is a registered lobbyist at Dentons Global Advisors, a law firm engaged in “commercial diplomacy” for its clients.
As of now, Casey’s campaign has not responded to a request for comment.
Does Casey’s acceptance of substantial contributions raise questions about his commitment to campaign finance reform
Casey has also received significant financial support from labor unions. The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) donated $10,000 to his campaign, while the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) contributed $5,000. These donations highlight the support Casey receives from organized labor, which has traditionally been a stronghold for the Democratic Party.
It is worth noting that Casey has been an outspoken advocate for campaign finance reform and reducing the influence of money in politics. He has called for the overturning of the Citizens United decision, which allowed for unlimited corporate spending on political campaigns. Despite this stance, his acceptance of large donations from wealthy individuals and interest groups raises questions about his commitment to these ideals.
This is not to say that Casey’s deep-pocketed supporters are necessarily exerting undue influence over his policy decisions. But it does highlight the complex relationship between money and politics, and the need for transparency and accountability in campaign fundraising.
Ultimately, the question arises of whether Casey’s rhetoric on campaign finance reform aligns with his actions. While his criticism of his opponent’s wealthy backers may be politically motivated, it is clear that he also benefits from the financial support of wealthy liberals and influential interest groups. This raises concerns about the potential influence of money on his decision-making process and calls into question the integrity of his campaign finance reform platform.
In conclusion, Senator Bob Casey, who often criticizes his opponents for being funded by “right-wing billionaires,” also has his fair share of wealthy liberal supporters. While it is not uncommon for politicians to receive financial support from wealthy individuals and interest groups, Casey’s acceptance of substantial contributions raises questions about his commitment to campaign finance reform and the influence of money in politics. As voters, it is important to remain vigilant and hold our elected officials accountable for their actions, regardless of their political affiliations.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
