the federalist

Bill Burr’s ‘Old Dads’ focuses on aging rather than fatherhood.


The ​age for first-time fathers has increased, ​with the percentage ‌ doubling for first-time dads over 40. While research around this trend is sparse, in general becoming a parent later in life ‍is⁤ seen as a good thing. Older dads are more financially secure,‍ they’re better able to‌ spend time with⁤ their kids,‌ and ​theoretically, they’re more patient. Also, though, they’re older. Energy levels aren’t quite what they were when these ⁢fathers were⁣ in⁤ their twenties. They’re less in tune with pop⁢ culture. ⁤They’re edging into “get off ⁣my ​lawn” territory.

As such, the plight of older ⁢dads is an extremely topical‍ subject for comedy. ⁤Dealing with the aches and‌ pains of ‌aging ⁤while attempting to chase‌ young’uns⁣ around, playing catch with declining eyesight ⁤and⁣ reflexes, and⁢ resisting the urge to ⁢yell “get off my lawn!” when the ⁣neighborhood kids come to visit are things many of us deal with, even those of us ​who sired​ offspring ⁣in our thirties rather than ⁢our forties or fifties. Thus, when I saw that comedian Bill Burr, who became⁤ a father ‍at 48, decided to delve into the topic with ​his new movie “Old Dads” on Netflix, I was intrigued.

Alas, the movie isn’t​ actually​ focused on the‍ fatherhood angle, which quickly recedes into the background. ​Starring Burr (Jack), Bobby ‍Cannavale (Connor), ‍and Bokeem Woodbine (Mike) as three friends and business partners, the ‌film ​opens on the ⁢topic of dads, with the trio at ⁣a party at Jack’s house. Connor’s son⁤ is terrorizing everyone, ⁤or “learning how crossing this boundary is affecting his ever-evolving ​moral code,” in the words of his mother, a loony Los ‍Angelino whose approach to parenting⁢ is somewhat laxer than that ⁢of ⁣a hyena.

This scene sets⁢ the stage for the actual thrust of the movie, which is that it’s⁢ difficult for aging ​Gen‍ Xers ⁢to⁢ navigate the modern world’s ever-evolving moral⁤ code. In the next⁤ scene, for example,⁤ the movie shifts to Jack, Connor, and Mike’s travails in dealing with​ their new millennial boss, Aspen,‌ who assumed the role after the three​ sold to investors so​ that Jack could ‍afford to send his kid to private school. ‍While those travails are‌ not ‍irrelevant — being a dad in​ 2023 does⁣ necessarily involve a ⁢lot of nonsense ⁣stemming from modern secular​ religion’s prevalence in the workplace — they ⁢are ⁢not travails that are specific to fathers.

Nor does the movie’s ⁣main conflict have⁢ anything to ​do with fatherhood, which is the large number of microaggressions Jack, Connor, ‌and Mike engage in while on a trip, along with Aspen’s right-hand man (Travis),⁣ to find Ed⁤ Cameron, a man who’s ⁣been living off the grid, and convince him to become an ⁢influencer. Presumably, this also involves explaining the ⁣internet and influencers to him, though ‌that action occurs off-camera.

What does happen on⁣ camera is⁤ that Jack, Connor, and Mike offer colorful thoughts on sex⁣ with celebrities ⁢and whether or not⁢ Bruce Jenner kept his manhood. Naturally, the rental car company has​ cameras in the⁤ car and shares footage of these ⁢conversations with Aspen. As a‍ result, the three get canceled from their jobs.

Travis, despite being a‍ good woke⁤ millennial‌ like Aspen, also ⁤gets canceled, though for a different reason,⁣ also having nothing to do with being an old dad, not‍ least of‍ which because he’s​ young and⁤ not a‍ father. In the car, Mike​ asks him ⁤if he says the N-word when rapping along with N.W.A. Travis refuses to⁢ do⁤ so in that ⁢moment,⁢ but security footage from his apartment, also obtained by Aspen, reveals ⁢he’s quite fond⁣ of using it when rapping along with his favorite bangers.

In ​the⁤ age of cancel culture, these are important topics. What and where‍ are the boundaries? Is this ⁣really how we want society to ‍operate? And⁢ comedians such as⁤ Burr⁢ are often the ones best positioned to ​ask ⁣those questions⁣ and gently chide us into accepting the insanity of the fact that they’re⁤ questions that even⁢ need to be asked. What they are not are topics specific to being an old dad. Young dads, single men, moms, and single women can get canceled ‌too.

Nonetheless, unlike ‍with “Barbie,” “Old ‍Dads” ‌is the‍ movie the preview showed us it would be. ​For that ​Burr deserves credit. He didn’t try to fool​ anyone. Also, the movie is moderately entertaining with some genuinely funny moments here and there and really tight pacing. There are no wasted scenes.⁤

As a whole, though, it uses the premise of old⁣ dads as a launchpad for a fight against ‌the​ silliness of modern life ​rather than having ⁢fun⁢ with the challenges that we older fathers of⁢ the 21st century face. As such, on my dad-centric movie rating scale,⁢ I’m not proud of it and I’m not mad about it, but as with “Barbie,” I am disappointed.


rnrn

Be a film that successfully ⁣captures the complexities and humor of being an ⁣older ⁢father. ​However, “Old Dads” is not that film

N rapping along to songs, and Travis responds that he does. This sets off a whole discussion about‍ cultural appropriation and political correctness, which again, has nothing to do with the theme of fatherhood.

Overall, “Old Dads” fails to live up to its potential as a comedy⁣ about the challenges and joys of being an older father. Instead, ⁤it veers off into unrelated topics and lacks a clear focus. While the performances of Bill Burr, Bobby Cannavale, and Bokeem Woodbine are strong, the screenplay does not provide them‍ with enough⁢ material to showcase their comedic talents.

In⁤ conclusion, “Old ⁤Dads” is a missed opportunity to explore the unique experiences of older fathers in a comedic and⁣ relatable manner. Despite the growing number of ‌first-time dads over ‍40, the film ‌fails to effectively address the specific challenges and⁣ joys that come with being an older father. The lack of ⁤focus on fatherhood and the inclusion ​of unrelated themes⁣ detract from the overall enjoyment of the movie. ‌Perhaps in the future, there will



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker