Big Media’s Right: Trump, Biden Documents Cases Are Vastly Different

Big Media wants all of us to be aware of how frustratingly inconvenient this is Discovery of two sets classified documents In the hands of President Joe Biden.

The Democrat activists in press find it difficult because they have to continue assuring rubes that the situation is being handled. This is a very different case. The documents show the case against former President Donald Trump. For Attorney General Merrick Garland, it is inconvenient because, to the untrained eye, it could look like he has one standard for his boss and another one for his boss’s once and possibly future election opponent. But, some helpfully point out, it is also inconvenient for Trump, because now he can’t accuse Biden of a crime without admitting he committed one.

According to the media, Trump had U.S. nuclear secrets he could sell to foreign enemies. called for Trump’s execution(!)He is currently working overtime to differentiate between the two cases. Biden only had a handful of classified documents, and another tranche was discovered in a Biden location. Biden’s lawyers immediately cooperated with the National Archives as soon as the documents were found at a place called the “Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement,” They pointed out that although the discovery was made after the November midterms, it was kept secret.

Based on the information we have so far, Trump should not hesitate to condemn Biden and admit his guilt. For one, Biden squirreled away his documents after serving as vice president, a role that, unlike Trump’s, did not include the right to unilaterally declassify any federal document. Another big difference, especially in light of the fact that Biden’s documents are now reported to contain classified information about Ukraine, Iran, and the United Kingdom, is that Biden has a son who spent much of his father’s vice presidency trading influence for lucrative deals and no-show jobs.

Trump’s documents were kept locked in a room at Mar-a-Lago while his lawyers haggled with the National Archives over their importance. The first batch of Biden documents including top-secret and was at least partially complete. “sensitive compartmented” information, was at a fake think tank that’s part of a university reportedly funded in part by $54 million in China-related donations. If you’re curious about who had access to them, then you clearly don’t work for the Justice Department, The New York Times, or the Washington Post.

The most striking difference between these two cases is how the Justice Department and the media behave. Instead of speculate about Biden’s secret hiding places, the media is interfering for him. And while the FBI raided Trump’s home and Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed a special counsel to probe the ex-president, the Justice Department so far seems content to treat Biden’s case as one big misunderstanding.

We still don’t know what the documents recovered at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in an unprecedented August raid pertained to, but we’ll eventually find out – as long as it can be portrayed as sufficiently damning. But don’t bet on Garland to ask tough questions in Biden’s case. This seems more like an effort for the top, and less like a struggle to get to the bottom of something.