Biden’s gas shutdown harms environment, impoverishes and distresses
The Biden Administration Halts LNG Export Terminal Projects in the Name of Climate Change
The Biden Administration made a significant announcement on Friday, putting a stop to the permitting process for several liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal projects. The decision is based on concerns about climate change and its impact on carbon emissions. The White House and Department of Energy (DOE) have stated that a thorough environmental review will be conducted, which could take more than a year to complete.
“It simultaneously harms the U.S. economy, threatens the security of our allies around the world, and stymies global emissions reduction goals.”
American Exploration & Production Council CEO Anne Bradbury criticized the decision, calling it “nonsensical.” She argues that it not only damages the economy but also poses a threat to global emissions reduction efforts. However, this move may seem nonsensical if you believe that climate activists genuinely care about the environment, which they do not.
Climate activists often present their anti-energy policies as necessary to prevent the destruction of humanity. Ironically, fossil fuels have played a crucial role in reducing climate-related disaster deaths by 99 percent compared to a century ago. Fossil fuels provide essential resources such as heating, air conditioning, durable buildings, and mass irrigation. Banning fossil fuels would leave humanity vulnerable to the elements and result in more climate-related deaths.
It seems that the true goal of these activists is not environmental preservation but rather depopulation. They advocate for policies that discourage the use of wood, coal, oil, propane, and natural gas for heating homes, ultimately leading to freezing deaths. Their ultimate aim is to reduce the human population.
This is not a radical conspiracy theory; prominent climate activists openly express their desire for depopulation. For example, environmentalist professor Dennis Meadows has stated that he believes there are too many people on Earth and hopes for a “peaceful” extermination of billions.
These so-called climate activists, including figures like Klaus Schwab and Larry Fink, are not genuine advocates for the planet or humanity. They promote anti-humanist policies while living lavish lifestyles that consume vast amounts of energy. Their hypocrisy is evident in their constant travel on private jets and their luxurious mansions.
These wealthy elites, posing as environmentalists, are the ultimate fraudsters. They change their stance on energy sources, promoting natural gas as a replacement for coal in the past but now targeting natural gas as well. Similarly, they initially touted electric vehicles as the environmentally friendly alternative to gas-powered cars, but now they oppose privately owned vehicles altogether.
Climate policies pushed by these activists only serve to disempower and impoverish the masses. For instance, they advocate for an end to meat and dairy consumption, despite the fact that these foods are packed with essential nutrients for human flourishing. By artificially causing food shortages, they aim to force people to switch to alternative protein sources like bugs and lab-grown meat. This strategy leads to nutritional deficiencies and starvation, ultimately resulting in depopulation.
Furthermore, environmentalists guilt young people into not having children for the sake of the planet. This fearmongering has led to a significant percentage of young people being hesitant to start families due to climate change concerns.
Another aspect of the depopulation plan is the transition to a neo-feudalistic society. Climate conferences like the one in Paris in 2014 aimed to change the economic development model that has been in place since the Industrial Revolution. The goal is to consolidate power in the hands of corporations and governments, under the guise of equity and environmental concerns.
Private ownership is a hindrance to their plans, so they seek to eliminate it. Hedge funds and private billionaires are buying up residential homes and farmland worldwide, as outlined in the World Economic Forum’s vision for 2030, where individuals will own nothing.
Ironically, policies that impoverish people actually harm the environment. Wealthier nations have cleaner environments and put less strain on natural resources. However, poverty fuels reliance on centralized government control.
Ultimately, these climate policies, which aim to abolish fossil fuels, reduce birth rates, and create artificial food shortages, will have a devastating impact on the global population. If people are vulnerable, poor, malnourished, and lacking basic necessities, the depopulation goals of figures like Dennis Meadows will be realized, and billions will suffer.
What impact does the halting of LNG export terminal projects have on the security of our allies and their vulnerability to manipulation and coercion from energy-rich nations
Masses while consolidating power and wealth in the hands of a few. The halting of LNG export terminal projects by the Biden Administration is just another example of this. By cutting off the potential for economic growth and job creation, they are harming the U.S. economy and threatening the livelihoods of hardworking Americans.
Furthermore, this decision also poses a significant threat to the security of our allies around the world. Natural gas exports have been a vital tool in diversifying energy sources and reducing dependence on countries like Russia. By halting these projects, the Biden Administration is leaving our allies vulnerable to manipulation and coercion from energy-rich nations.
The argument presented by the Biden Administration and climate activists is that these projects contribute to carbon emissions and exacerbate climate change. While it is essential to address climate change, the complete disregard for the positive impacts of natural gas is concerning. Natural gas is a cleaner-burning fossil fuel compared to coal and oil, and its increased use has played a crucial role in reducing carbon emissions.
Rather than demonizing natural gas and halting its exportation, a more comprehensive and balanced approach to energy and climate policies is required. Investing in research and development for cleaner technologies, promoting energy efficiency, and supporting the responsible use of natural gas can align environmental goals with economic prosperity.
It is essential to separate genuine environmental concerns from the hidden agenda of depopulation promoted by some climate activists. By advocating for policies that discourage the use of essential energy resources, these activists put lives at risk and undermine human well-being. The focus should be on finding sustainable solutions that safeguard the environment without compromising the needs and safety of the global population.
In conclusion, the Biden Administration’s decision to halt LNG export terminal projects in the name of climate change raises concerns about the true motivations behind these policies. While it is vital to address climate change, it must be done in a way that considers the economic and security implications and promotes the responsible use of natural gas. Environmental preservation should not come at the cost of human well-being and progress. It is crucial to critically examine the hidden agendas of certain climate activists and ensure that policies are based on sound scientific evidence and the best interest of the people they claim to protect.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
