Biden’s student loan plan faces new court challenge for 800K borrowers.
A Coalition Vows to Appeal Federal Judge’s Ruling on Student Loan Forgiveness
A coalition of organizations, including the Mackinac Center for Public Policy and the Cato Institute, has pledged to appeal a federal judge’s ruling that allowed the Biden administration’s plan to forgive student loans for 800,000 borrowers to proceed.
Libertarian Think Tanks Challenge Loan Forgiveness Plan
The Mackinac Center and the Cato Institute, both libertarian-leaning think tanks, filed a lawsuit seeking to block the loan forgiveness plan. However, the judge ruled that they lacked standing in the case.
Biden Administration’s Explanation of Loan Forgiveness
The Biden administration argues that the loan forgiveness is an “adjustment” that recognizes payments made under the Income Driven Repayment program or the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. These federal programs allow borrowers to have their loans forgiven after making payments for a significant period of time, typically 20 years or more.
President Biden’s Response to the Court Ruling
President Joe Biden expressed satisfaction with the court ruling, stating that it paves the way for the administration to implement its plan. He assured borrowers that their loan balances would soon be reduced to zero.
“On Day One of my Administration, I promised to fight for hardworking families and fix the flaws in the student loan system that have burdened borrowers for far too long,” said President Biden. “I am proud that my Administration is delivering on that promise, having already approved over $116 billion in debt cancellation for 3.4 million Americans. Regardless of the obstacles put in our way by Republican officials or special interests, we will continue to prioritize the needs of the American people.”
Plaintiffs Determined to Pursue Appeal
Undeterred by the court’s ruling, the plaintiffs, represented by the New Civil Liberties Alliance, have announced their intention to appeal. They argue that the district court’s decision was based on the lack of standing and not on the merits of the case.
In a statement to the Washington Examiner, attorney Sheng Li from the New Civil Liberties Alliance emphasized that a similar case challenging the Biden administration’s loan forgiveness efforts had seen the Supreme Court overturn a district court’s ruling on standing.
“Yesterday’s decision was not a judgment on the merits but rather a conclusion by the district court that our clients lacked standing to sue,” said Li. “We disagree with that decision and will be pursuing an appeal.”
Click here to read more from the Washington Examiner.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
