In the Military, Rules Matter: Why the Biden Pentagon Wants to Give Benefits to Former Troops Who Broke Them
In the military, rules are not to be taken lightly. They are the foundation that ensures order and discipline. When individuals voluntarily join the military, they agree to abide by these rules, even if they disagree with them. Throughout history, there have been instances where military rules were unjust, such as segregation. However, the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy implemented during Bill Clinton’s administration was seen as a progressive step, allowing LGBTQ+ service members to serve without disclosing their sexual orientation. But now, with the rise of wokeness in the current administration, the Pentagon aims to restore benefits to those who were discharged under this policy.
The Department of Defense has initiated a new effort to reach out to former service members who were forced out of the military due to their sexual orientation, starting with those affected by ”Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” This policy affected at least 32,837 service members since 1980, denying them access to benefits like home loans, healthcare, and education assistance. While correcting these records cannot fully undo the harm caused, it is a step towards rectifying the injustice faced by LGBTQ+ service members.
However, it is important to acknowledge that rules exist in the military for a reason. They ensure the safety and effectiveness of the armed forces. The repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” in 2011 did not retroactively make violations of the policy acceptable. Breaking the rules, regardless of personal beliefs, is still a violation. The current focus on LGBTQ+ issues in the military raises questions about the prioritization of wokeness over readiness and unity.
It is crucial to have a military that operates cohesively, with all members adhering to the same set of rules. Allowing individual interpretations of rules based on personal beliefs would lead to chaos and undermine the purpose of a disciplined military. While it is important to address past injustices, it should not be done by disregarding the rules that were in place at the time. Upholding the rules ensures a strong and effective military, capable of defending the nation.
As we navigate the complexities of a changing world, it is essential to strike a balance between progress and maintaining the integrity of the military. The Biden administration’s focus on wokeness may have unintended consequences, including potential military vulnerabilities. It is crucial to prioritize national security and the well-being of service members above all else.
Source: The Western Journal
How does the decision to reinstate benefits for these individuals align with the evolving societal acceptance and recognition of LGBTQ+ rights?
Rmer service members who were discharged because of their sexual orientation under the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy. This policy, which was introduced in 1993, prohibited openly gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals from serving in the military. It allowed LGBTQ+ service members to serve as long as they kept their sexual orientation a secret. However, if their sexual orientation was discovered or disclosed, they could face discharge from the military.
The decision to restore benefits to those who were discharged under this policy is rooted in the belief that it was an unjust rule. The Biden administration recognizes that individuals should not have been penalized or denied benefits solely because of their sexual orientation. It acknowledges that these former service members made significant sacrifices and contributions to their country, and it is only fair to ensure they receive the benefits they were entitled to.
Some argue against this decision, claiming that it sets a dangerous precedent of rewarding individuals who broke military rules. They argue that rules are rules, and regardless of personal beliefs or opinions, service members must adhere to them. However, it is crucial to consider the context in which these rules were broken. The “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy forced LGBTQ+ service members into a position where they had to suppress their identities to continue serving. It created a hostile environment where individuals had to choose between their truth and their commitment to the military.
Moreover, it is important to note that rules within the military have evolved over time. Military policies have been updated to reflect societal changes and advancements in understanding. The decision to reinstate benefits for former service members discharged under the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy aligns with the evolving societal acceptance and recognition of LGBTQ+ rights. It acknowledges that this policy was discriminatory and reinforces a commitment to inclusion and equality within the military.
Supporters of the policy change argue that restoring benefits to these individuals helps rectify past injustices and sends a message of inclusivity to current and future service members. It demonstrates that the military values its members, regardless of sexual orientation, and aims to create an environment that is supportive and accepting. By acknowledging the past wrongs committed under the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, the military can move forward and foster an atmosphere of trust and respect for all service members.
In conclusion, the Biden Pentagon’s decision to restore benefits to former troops discharged under the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy reflects a commitment to rectifying past injustices and promoting inclusivity within the military. The recognition that this policy was discriminatory and caused harm to LGBTQ+ service members is an important step towards creating a more fair and accepting environment. While some may argue against rewarding individuals who broke military rules, it is crucial to acknowledge the specific circumstances and context in which these rules were broken. Ultimately, the military must adapt and evolve to reflect the changing needs and values of society while upholding its commitment to order and discipline.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."