The federalist

Biden Administration pushes risky alterations to Title IX

Reviving Obama’s Title IX Policies: The Biden ‍Administration’s Dangerous Gambit

When President Obama ‍faced opposition in Congress, he famously declared that he still had his⁢ phone⁤ and his pen. However, it wasn’t just ‌him who had the power to enact policies. Bureaucrats in federal agencies also had⁤ their own phones and pens, leading to repeated ‌reinterpretations ⁣of Title IX, a ‌crucial federal civil ‍rights ⁤statute.

Title IX, enacted in 1972, protects girls’ and women’s athletics and prohibits sexual harassment and sex discrimination in schools. However, ⁢in 2015, a ‍bureaucrat in‌ the Department of Education (DOE) ⁣issued a sweeping new policy, stating that schools ⁢must consider a person’s gender identity when assigning them to facilities and teams.

When President Trump took office, he aimed ​to⁣ change the DOE’s habit of “regulating‌ by letter.” Secretary‌ of Education ​Betsy DeVos ⁤successfully implemented Title IX changes in 2020, striking a balance between eliminating‌ sexual⁤ harassment and protecting‍ due⁣ process.

However, ⁣the Biden administration is now attempting ⁢to scrap ⁣DeVos’ ‌rules and revive Obama’s policies. ​They want to expand Title IX to cover sexual​ orientation and gender ⁢identity discrimination in schools nationwide, ⁣despite the statute’s language only addressing “sex” discrimination.

The DOE has recently submitted the‍ final touches to its​ new Title ⁣IX rule, which is ⁣expected to be approved by the president.⁤ This rule ‌will require K-12 schools ‌and colleges to implement policies specifically‍ addressing ⁢sexual orientations and gender identities‍ of all kinds, potentially‍ including bisexuals,​ polyamorous individuals, and “non-binary” gender ‍identities.

While it’s important to enforce anti-discrimination principles⁢ for transgender individuals, the ‍Biden administration’s proposed rule⁤ goes beyond that. ⁢It demands that schools accept and accommodate every student’s self-proclaimed ​gender identity and sexual orientation,‍ or face accusations of violating federal civil rights laws.

The consequences of this ⁣radical departure from past enforcement of Title IX are immense. The debates over ​bathrooms, pronouns, and sports teams are ‌just the beginning. With the proliferation of ⁣gender identities‌ since ‌2015,⁤ schools may face demands for separate dormitories⁢ for ‍each unique gender ⁤identity and requests from students identifying as animals, autigender, or even cake.

Complying ‌with the new Title IX rule will ⁤be challenging for‍ teachers and administrators. They ⁢will struggle to understand their⁣ obligations to provide equal access to school facilities for ‍students who identify outside the traditional male or female categories. In extreme cases, individuals⁢ could claim sexual orientation as a “minor-attracted person,”‍ potentially creating a loophole for pedophiles.

While these outcomes ⁢may seem outrageous ⁢or silly, ‍times ⁣are ⁢changing rapidly,⁣ and what seems ridiculous today may‌ become the “new normal” tomorrow. That’s why ​the ⁣Biden administration’s proposed Title IX changes‍ are a ‌dangerous⁣ gambit.


William E. Trachman ⁣is‌ the general counsel‍ of Mountain States Legal‌ Foundation and the former deputy assistant secretary for‍ civil rights in the⁣ Trump ‍administration.

What are the ‌concerns about⁤ due process ⁢rights for individuals accused of‌ sexual misconduct‍ under ‍the Obama-era policies,⁢ and how could reviving these policies potentially lead to unjust outcomes

This gambit by the Biden‌ administration is dangerous for‌ several reasons.‍ First and foremost, it undermines⁣ the rule of law. Title IX was enacted by Congress and its language⁣ clearly addresses “sex” discrimination,⁢ not sexual⁢ orientation ⁢or gender identity⁤ discrimination. By attempting to reinterpret the ⁣law to fit their own agenda, the Biden administration is essentially legislating from the executive⁢ branch,⁢ bypassing the proper legislative process.

Not only⁤ does this set a dangerous precedent for future administrations, but⁢ it ​also undermines the separation of ⁤powers‍ and the checks ⁢and balances that are fundamental to our democracy. ⁢It ⁤allows unelected bureaucrats in federal agencies to ⁤unilaterally change ⁢the meaning of a ‌statute without the input ⁢or oversight of Congress.

Furthermore, expanding Title IX to cover sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in schools raises significant concerns about the infringement‌ of religious freedom and freedom of speech. Religious schools, for example, may have sincerely-held ​beliefs about human sexuality and may wish to maintain policies ⁢that align with their religious ⁢teachings. By forcing these schools to comply with ⁣policies that go against their beliefs, ⁤the‌ Biden administration would be violating their constitutional rights.

Additionally, there are concerns about due process rights for individuals accused of sexual misconduct.‍ Under the Obama-era policies, ⁢accused students ​were⁤ often denied basic due process protections, such as the right to cross-examine their accuser or the right to legal representation. These ⁤policies led ⁤to numerous cases of innocent ‍students being falsely accused‍ and having their lives devastated without any recourse. DeVos’ ⁣Title‍ IX changes sought to strike a balance between protecting victims of sexual harassment and ensuring that accused students are afforded fair and equitable processes. Reviving Obama’s policies ⁣would once again tip the scales in favor of accusers, potentially leading to more unjust outcomes.

The ⁣Biden ‍administration’s attempt to revive Obama’s Title IX policies is not only legally dubious, but it also threatens the fundamental principles of ⁢our democracy and the rights of individuals. It ​is imperative that we uphold the rule⁢ of law ⁣and preserve the proper separation of ⁤powers. Congress should be the entity responsible for creating and amending laws, not unelected‍ bureaucrats. Furthermore, any changes to Title IX should be carefully considered and balanced to ensure ‌the protection of all individuals involved.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker