Ashli Babbitt’s family seeks $30M in lawsuit against U.S. Govt

The Family of Ashli Babbitt Files $30 ⁢Million Lawsuit Against U.S. Government

The​ family⁢ of Ashli ⁢Babbitt, an Air ⁣Force veteran who tragically lost her‌ life during ​the events at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, has taken legal action against the U.S. government. They are seeking $30 million in damages, alleging that Babbitt was “ambushed” by a police officer.

The lawsuit, filed by conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch ‌on behalf⁤ of Babbitt’s estate and her husband Aaron, accuses the⁣ U.S. Capitol Police and then-Capitol Police ⁣Lt. Michael Byrd ⁤of assault and battery, negligence, wrongful death, and more. The complaint specifically focuses on ⁢the actions of Lt. Byrd, who fatally shot Babbitt as she attempted to enter a​ barricaded lobby door⁣ unarmed.

“The only homicide on January 6 ‌was the unlawful shooting death of Ashli Babbitt. Her⁣ homicide by Lt. Byrd is ⁤a scandal beyond belief. This historic ‌lawsuit⁤ seeks a measure of justice and ‍government accountability for Ashli’s wrongful⁤ death,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

Judicial Watch and ‌their supporters are proud to represent Aaron Babbitt and Ashli’s estate in this legal battle. They firmly believe that Ashli‍ was shot without‌ justification and that justice must⁢ be served.

One of the key⁤ claims made in the lawsuit is that Lt. Byrd was not in uniform at the time of the incident and failed to identify himself as a police officer to Ashli. The complaint states that he did not ⁤provide any ⁤warnings or commands before firing the fatal shot.

CLICK HERE TO GET ‍THE⁤ DAILYWIRE+ APP

DOJ‍ Declines to ‍Pursue⁢ Charges Against ‌Lt. ‌Byrd

In April 2021, the Department ⁣of Justice (DOJ) announced that they would not be pressing charges⁣ against‌ Lt. Byrd for the shooting. The DOJ stated that their investigation found no evidence to suggest that the officer did not reasonably believe that ⁤using force was necessary for self-defense or to protect members of Congress.

Months later, in August 2021, the U.S.⁢ Capitol Police concluded their internal investigation and determined that Lt. Byrd would not face disciplinary⁤ action.‌ In an interview with NBC News, Lt. Byrd revealed his⁢ identity and claimed that he resorted to using his weapon as ⁢a last resort.

⁣ What challenges and potential implications does this lawsuit pose, including the doctrine of qualified immunity and its impact on holding law enforcement officers accountable for their actions ⁣during volatile situations

Re. The lawsuit claims that Babbitt’s constitutional rights were violated when she was fatally shot ​by Byrd while attempting to climb ⁢through‌ a broken window inside the Capitol building.

According to the​ complaint, ‌the family argues that Babbitt was not given a warning before being shot, ⁤and that the use ‌of deadly force was unjustified. They argue⁤ that the situation did not present ⁤an immediate threat to the officer’s life nor the lives of others⁤ inside the⁢ building. The lawsuit also alleges that ‍Byrd violated departmental policies and training protocols.

Ashli Babbitt’s death was a ⁣tragic event that shocked the nation and raised significant controversy.⁤ The events of January 6, 2021, saw ⁣a violent mob​ storm the U.S. ‌Capitol,⁤ resulting in multiple injuries and the deaths of both law enforcement officers and protesters.

While supporters of the lawsuit argue that Babbitt’s death should not be‍ brushed aside, critics question the validity of ⁣the claims, suggesting that Babbitt was actively participating in an⁢ unlawful activity and‍ that the officer’s actions were justified in the context of ‌protecting lawmakers and maintaining order.

Legal experts predict that this lawsuit will ‌face numerous challenges, including the doctrine⁢ of qualified immunity, which often ⁤shields government officials from personal liability for actions taken in the line of duty. Additionally, critics argue that Babbitt’s actions that day ⁤could be seen as a direct threat to the safety and security of elected officials.

The outcome of this lawsuit will be closely watched, as it has the potential⁣ to set ⁤a precedent for‌ how law ‍enforcement officers are held⁢ accountable for their actions during high-stakes and⁣ highly volatile situations.

Whatever the final judgment may be, the lawsuit serves to highlight the ongoing debate surrounding the use of force by law enforcement and the potential consequences of these actions. It raises questions about the delicate balance ​between ⁣protecting public safety and ‍preserving individual rights.

As the legal battle⁣ unfolds, it is crucial to keep in mind that⁣ this incident is part of a broader conversation about ‍the societal impact of the events that unfolded on ⁣January 6, 2021, and the unresolved⁤ issues that continue to divide the nation.

Regardless of the outcome, the ⁢tragic loss of Ashli Babbitt’s⁣ life remains a painful reminder ‌of the profound consequences that‌ result from extreme political ⁣divisions and the​ dangerous consequences that can‍ stem from civil unrest. Seeking justice and holding accountable those responsible ⁣for Babbitt’s‌ death is an important step towards ⁢healing and restoring faith ⁣in the democratic values⁤ that underpin our nation.