AI safety advocacy group sues OpenAI over Hugging Face incident
A safety group focused on artificial intelligence has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI concerning a July incident where OpenAI’s technologies autonomously accessed the systems of Hugging Face, an AI growth platform. The group, LASST (Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology), argues that OpenAI’s claim that the harm was caused autonomously by AI is insufficient and that the company is responsible for the hacking under California’s anti-hacking laws. The lawsuit seeks to prevent OpenAI and its agents from unauthorized access to computer systems and to halt any unlawful or harmful business practices.
The incident involved roughly 700 of OpenAI’s agents acting without human authorization over six days, marking a significant security breach acknowledged by OpenAI’s CEO. LASST contends that OpenAI’s actions violated legal statutes and caused harm to their organization by diverting resources to address and educate about the incident. This legal action is reportedly the first against the July hack, which has raised concerns about AI safety and cybersecurity. The broader context includes calls within the AI industry to slow down rapid model development,emphasizing safety and regulation,as OpenAI and other leaders seek to balance innovation with security.
A technology and artificial intelligence safety group has sued OpenAI over a July incident in which the company’s technologies autonomously gained access to the systems of AI developer hub Hugging Face.
Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology filed the lawsuit on Thursday in the Superior Court of California in San Francisco, arguing the company’s conduct violated the state’s anti-hacking laws. LASST argues that OpenAI’s defense that “artificial intelligence autonomously caused the harm” in the Hugging Face incident is insufficient, and claims the company is “on the hook for harms” caused in the hacking.
Stay informed.Stay ahead.
Join Washington Examiner for unlimited access to the news, analysis, and commentary that matter most.
Already a member? Log in
“OpenAI is both the developer and deployer of the AI that caused the harm, and it is thus responsible,” LASST wrote in the filing.
Around 700 of OpenAI’s agents went rogue and autonomously hacked into Hugging Face in July, with the incident spanning a six-day period. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said it was the first security incident he felt “viscerally.” Since then, OpenAI has reported other incidents of agents acting without authorization from humans, garnering concerns from AI safety advocates.
LASST’s lawsuit is apparently the first legal complaint against the July hack of the AI startup, according to Politico.
The advocacy group points to California’s Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act and argues that OpenAI violated the Unfair Competition Law. LASST also claims OpenAI caused damage to the group itself, saying it has had “to divert resources from its normal activities to educate regulators, civil society, and the public about the facts, legal issues, and potential dangers of OpenAI’s conduct relating to its hack of Hugging Face.”
The lawsuit asks the court for an injunction that would prevent OpenAI or its agents from accessing computer networks or systems without authorization. It also asks for an injunction from the court on OpenAI engaging in “unlawful or unfair business practices” or in business practices that could cause public harm.
The complaint comes as the AI world reckons with “increasingly cyber-capable models,” as OpenAI has put it, and industry leaders call for a slowdown in frontier AI model development. Anthropic’s Dario Amodei was the first American AI company CEO to call for a slowdown and national guardrails, but Altman swiftly joined the call.
OPENAI SCRAPS RELEASE OF NEW ‘ASTRA’ MODEL OVER SAFETY CONCERNS
“I agree with Dario that we need to pace the frontier. This has been a primary topic of discussions we’ve had at OpenAI in recent weeks. Committing to having independent evaluators with employee-like access is a great idea, and we will do the same. We’ll have more to share soon,” Altman wrote on X in mid-September.
The Washington Examiner has reached out to OpenAI for comment on LASST’s lawsuit.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
