the federalist

Senate Republicans finally acknowledge America’s border crisis after countless illegal crossings

Senate Republicans ​Finally Show⁢ Concern for​ Border ⁣Crisis

It only⁣ took millions of illegal immigrants violating American sovereignty during ‍Joe Biden’s presidency, ‍but Senate Republicans are finally concerned about the ongoing invasion at the U.S.-Mexico border — or are⁤ they?

In ⁣recent weeks,​ Senate GOPers have been unusually vocal about the unprecedented influx⁤ of illegal‌ immigrants at the U.S.-Mexico border, a crisis created by Biden administration policies that’s wreaking ‌havoc on communities across the country. On Wednesday, for ⁣instance, Senate Republicans blocked a $110.5 billion foreign-aid package proposed by Biden that sought​ to ⁢give tens ⁤of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to Ukraine, arguing that the measure must include ‌“strict new changes related to asylum” and ‍other border policies before it receives GOP support.

The bill also would have earmarked funds for Israel ⁣and “other global hot spots.”

“As we’ve said for weeks, legislation that doesn’t include policy changes to secure ⁢our borders will not pass the Senate,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a major proponent of shipping ‍U.S. aid to Ukraine, said.

But Republicans’⁤ push for increased U.S.⁣ border security isn’t ‌as heroic as they’re making it out⁣ to ​be. McConnell ⁤and Co. aren’t saying they’ll ‌no longer advance more aid to Ukraine altogether. They’re just stating they won’t consider doing so unless funding for U.S. border security comes with⁤ it.

In other words, the ⁣Republican message ⁤to Democrats is: “Give us enough border funding to placate our base, and we’ll keep helping you bankroll Ukraine’s‍ forever war.”

[[READ:‌ Poll: At 48 Percent, Growing Plurality Of ‍Americans Say U.S. Spends ‘Too Much’ On Ukraine Proxy War]

Republicans’ argument — like that‍ on so many other issues — comes from a⁢ point of weakness. If the border⁢ crisis is as dire as they’re claiming​ —‍ it is — then protecting the American⁣ homeland should be the only priority that ‌matters. ⁢Instead, the GOP establishment sees an ⁢opportunity to kill two birds with one stone.

On​ one hand, tying border security to Ukraine aid allows neocons⁢ such as McConnell to continue to fund their proxy war in Eastern‌ Europe and financially boost their buddies working in America’s military-industrial complex. ⁢On the other, it gives Senate Republicans ‍ something to ‌campaign on ahead ​of next year’s elections other than⁣ selling out their ⁢voters on a myriad of issues.

Biden’s border crisis​ has been raging for nearly three years,‌ but McConnell and ⁢Co. decide now — months before the earliest GOP Senate primaries — to begin raising Cain and using their institutional power to force Democrats to negotiate on the issue. Better late than never, ⁢right?

If Senate Republicans ultimately manage ⁤to force Democrats to offer some changes to the U.S. ⁢border policy, conservatives should make sure that the​ “negotiated” outcome is strictly relegated to⁤ securing the border. In the past, “immigration reform”⁤ produced between the two parties has‌ often involved amnesty for illegal aliens, a proposal that would undoubtedly attract more illegals to America’s southern border.⁢ Ahead of last year’s⁤ lame duck session, for ⁢example, Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, a Democrat-turned-independent from ‌Arizona, reportedly pressed Senate leadership to bring their ‌“immigration reform” bill that —⁤ among other things, would have provided a “pathway ‍to citizenship” to two million illegal immigrants⁣ brought to⁣ the U.S. as minors — to the floor​ for a vote.

While the​ bill⁣ ultimately never passed, its conception demonstrates the willingness of Republicans to sell out their ⁤voters at a moment’s notice in the name ⁢of “do-somethingism.”


Shawn Fleetwood ⁢is a​ staff writer for The Federalist and ⁣a graduate of ⁣the University of‍ Mary Washington. He ⁤previously served as a state content​ writer ⁣for Convention of States Action and his work has been⁢ featured in‌ numerous outlets, including RealClearPolitics, RealClearHealth, and ⁢Conservative⁣ Review. Follow him on Twitter @ShawnFleetwood

​How should voters and citizens assess the motivations and interests‌ of Senate Republicans when ‌addressing the border crisis⁤ and holding the⁢ Biden administration accountable

Der policies have undeniably contributed to a crisis‍ at the U.S.-Mexico border. The unrestricted flow of illegal immigrants has resulted ⁤in numerous⁣ consequences,⁤ including strains on ⁤communities and resources. It is therefore reasonable to expect Senate Republicans to show concern and take action ‍to ‍address this issue, which they finally seem to be doing.

In recent ⁢weeks, Senate ‌Republicans have been vocal about the unprecedented influx of illegal immigrants. They blocked a proposed foreign-aid package that sought to allocate significant ‍taxpayer‍ dollars to Ukraine, arguing that it must include strict policy changes related to asylum and other​ border⁤ policies to⁣ secure GOP support. ⁢This move clearly demonstrates their commitment to prioritizing⁢ border security.

However, it is crucial to analyze the‌ Republican stance more ⁢critically. Their push for increased border security comes with‌ a condition:⁤ they are not saying they will cease supporting aid ‍to ⁤Ukraine altogether. Instead, they are insisting on‌ funding for U.S. ​border security as a prerequisite for their‌ support. In other ‌words, they are​ leveraging ⁣the situation to ‍serve their own interests.

The Republican message to Democrats seems to be, “Provide us with enough funding for border security, ⁣and we will continue supporting aid to Ukraine.” This approach indicates that their concern for⁢ the border crisis ⁢may⁢ be driven by political calculations rather​ than an unwavering commitment to protecting the‍ American homeland.

It is worth questioning the Republican ⁤argument. If the border crisis is genuinely as dire as they claim, shouldn’t protecting the American homeland be ⁤their sole focus? By tying border security to Ukraine aid, they are simultaneously advancing their own agendas. For proponents like McConnell, this‍ means ensuring the continuation of a proxy war in Eastern Europe and financially benefiting the military-industrial complex. Additionally, it provides Senate Republicans with a campaign platform for next year’s elections, diverting attention from other issues where they⁢ may have compromised their principles.

While it is crucial ⁤to ⁢address the border crisis and hold the Biden administration ⁢accountable for its policies, it is equally important to assess the motivations⁤ and interests of ‌Senate⁢ Republicans. Their concern​ for the border crisis may not be as noble as ⁢they project. As voters and citizens, we must scrutinize ⁤their actions‍ and ‍demands to ensure they genuinely prioritize‍ the security and ​well-being of the American people.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker