Maine Supreme Court rejects Trump’s 14th Amendment case
Maine’s High Court Upholds Decision to Keep Trump on 2024 Ballot
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has declined to intervene in the debate over whether former President Donald Trump should be disqualified from the 2024 ballot under the 14th Amendment. This decision upholds a previous ruling by a judge, stating that the matter should be put on hold until the U.S. Supreme Court reviews a similar case in Colorado.
Background
Last December, Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows determined that Trump did not meet the qualifications to appear on the state’s primary ballot, citing the 14th Amendment’s provision disqualifying individuals who “engaged in insurrection” from holding public office. This decision came shortly after the Colorado Supreme Court also removed Trump from their ballot.
The Maine Superior Court, the state’s trial court, later ruled that Bellows’s removal of Trump should be delayed until the U.S. Supreme Court makes a decision on the Colorado case. Bellows appealed this ruling to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, which has now upheld the previous decision, allowing Trump to remain on Maine’s 2024 primary ballot until the U.S. Supreme Court reaches a verdict.
Reactions
Steven Cheung, Trump’s spokesman, criticized Bellows and referred to her as President Joe Biden’s “acolyte.” Cheung called the ruling a “devastating” blow to Bellows and expressed confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court will ultimately eliminate these “meritless, sham ’14th Amendment’ cases.”
Implications
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments in the Colorado case on February 8th, and a ruling is expected soon after. This decision is crucial due to the ongoing primary season, which has already begun with New Hampshire and Iowa.
Meanwhile, 27 states, led by Republican Attorneys General Todd Rokita of Indiana and Patrick Morrisey of West Virginia, have filed an amicus brief arguing that the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision could potentially disrupt the 2024 presidential election.
It is worth noting that other states, including Michigan, Minnesota, and Massachusetts, have attempted to remove Trump from their ballots but have faced legal challenges and rulings against their efforts. New Hampshire Secretary of State David Scanlan has concluded that the 14th Amendment does not apply to the election process and is obligated to include any candidate who meets the filing requirements on the ballot.
The Washington Examiner has reached out to Bellows for comment.
How does the controversy surrounding Trump’s eligibility for the 2024 election raise questions about the interpretation and application of the 14th Amendment
Eligibility requirements. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, states that anyone who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or given aid or comfort to its enemies, shall be disqualified from holding public office.
In response to Bellows’ decision, a group of Trump supporters filed a lawsuit, arguing that the 14th Amendment did not apply to the former president as he had not been formally convicted of any crimes related to insurrection or rebellion. The case was brought before Judge William Stokes of the Maine Superior Court.
The Ruling
After careful consideration of the arguments presented, Judge Stokes ruled in favor of Trump and granted an injunction against Secretary Bellows’ decision. The judge concluded that the matter should be deferred until the U.S. Supreme Court reviews a similar case in Colorado, where a state court had disqualified a candidate from the ballot based on the 14th Amendment.
Following the ruling, Secretary Bellows appealed the decision to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, arguing that the injunction was causing confusion and could potentially violate the rights of other candidates. However, the state’s highest court declined to take the case, effectively upholding Judge Stokes’ ruling.
Implications and Controversy
The decision by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court has significant implications for the 2024 election and raises important questions about the interpretation and application of the 14th Amendment. Some argue that disqualifying Trump from the ballot based on the 14th Amendment would set a dangerous precedent, as it would allow political opponents to exploit the amendment for partisan purposes.
Others, however, maintain that the 14th Amendment’s language is clear and should apply to anyone who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion. They argue that upholding the amendment’s requirements is crucial for preserving the integrity of our democratic processes and preventing individuals with a history of undermining the United States from holding public office.
Furthermore, the decision also highlights the significance of the upcoming Supreme Court case in Colorado, which will likely provide guidance on how states should interpret and apply the 14th Amendment’s disqualification provisions.
Conclusion
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court’s decision to uphold the ruling allowing Donald Trump to appear on the 2024 ballot has added fuel to the ongoing debate surrounding the 14th Amendment’s eligibility requirements. While some argue that disqualifying Trump would set a dangerous precedent, others stress the importance of upholding the integrity of our democratic processes.
The upcoming Supreme Court case in Colorado will be closely watched, as it will likely provide clarity on how states should navigate the application of the 14th Amendment. In the meantime, the controversy surrounding Trump’s eligibility to run in 2024 will continue to captivate the attention of the nation, highlighting the complex and ever-evolving nature of American democracy.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
