Biden distances from biting dog, but it backfires.
Lectures on Ethics: Kant’s Perspective on a President and His Dog
In his renowned work ”Lectures on Ethics,” Immanuel Kant, the 18th-century German philosopher, emphasized the importance of judging a person’s character based on their treatment of animals. According to Kant, the heart of a man can be revealed through his interactions with creatures.
Considering Kant’s philosophy, one cannot help but wonder what he would say about a president who allows his dog to attack Secret Service agents and then disclaims any responsibility.
Recently, Byron York of the Washington Examiner pointed out that President Biden’s disavowal of his own German shepherd, a 2-year-old named “Commander,” seems like a typical move from a career politician. It is a move that only makes sense in the world of Washington politics.
York shared his thoughts on the “White House dog scandal” on X (formerly Twitter), highlighting the fact that Commander has bitten people at least 11 times and yet remains at the White House. This raises the question of who would allow such behavior. In a true Washington fashion, Biden appears to be distancing himself from his own dog.
The White House dog scandal. President Biden’s dog Commander has bitten people at least 11 times. But Commander is still at the White House. Who would allow that? Now, in true Washington style, Biden appears to be distancing himself from his own dog. https://t.co/lBGyc7zzRF
— Byron York (@ByronYork) October 3, 2023
Last week, CNN reported that Commander had bitten another Secret Service agent, resulting in injuries and on-site medical treatment. This incident marks the 11th known attack on a Secret Service agent by Commander, as revealed through information obtained by the conservative government watchdog group Judicial Watch.
According to emails, there was even an occasion when first lady Jill Biden struggled to regain control of Commander as he attacked an agent. Former Secret Service agent Jonathan Wackrow described Commander’s aggressive behavior as a workplace safety issue.
Politico reported that Commander’s attacks on Secret Service agents have left most White House staffers shocked. Despite being known for his friendly nature, Commander’s sudden aggression is alarming to those who work closely with him.
While the White House treats these attacks as a public relations issue, claiming that the environment can be stressful for family pets, no effective measures have been disclosed to address Commander’s behavior.
As the story unfolds, it becomes clear that this “dog scandal” involves two villains who do not walk on all fours. Commander cannot be blamed for his actions, as dogs can react in stressful environments. However, the Bidens, as responsible dog owners, have allowed at least eleven attacks on Secret Service agents to occur.
York’s question, “Who would allow that?” resonates strongly. This story raises doubts about finding any redeeming qualities in the first family.
While the Bidens may claim to be dog lovers, their irresponsible behavior towards Commander and the safety of those around him speaks volumes. It is a behavior that is more distressing than overt animal cruelty.
A Note from Our Founder:
Every morning, we at The Western Journal wake up with a mission to provide you with important information about what’s happening in America.
We can’t fulfill this mission without your help. America has been bombarded with false narratives that aim to make you feel powerless. The Western Journal empowers you by exposing these false narratives.
However, I must be honest with you today. The future of The Western Journal is in jeopardy without your support. Silicon Valley and Big Tech tyrants have done everything they can to shut us down. It is our faithful donors and subscribers who have kept us going.
If you’ve never donated before, please consider helping us today. We need your support now more than ever. Our country hangs by a thread, and The Western Journal stands for truth in these challenging times.
Please stand with us by donating today.
Floyd G. Brown
Founder of The Western Journal
The post Biden Distances Himself from His Biting Dog – Only Makes Himself Look Bad appeared first on The Western Journal.
How does Kant’s philosophy on the treatment of animals contradict the behavior exhibited by President Biden’s dog?
Becomes clear that there is a stark contrast between Kant’s philosophy on the treatment of animals and the behavior exhibited by President Biden’s dog. According to Kant, a person’s moral character can be judged based on how they treat animals, as it reveals their capacity for empathy and compassion.
In Kant’s moral framework, humans have a duty to show kindness and respect towards animals, as they are sentient beings capable of suffering. Kant believed that cruelty towards animals is a sign of moral deficiency and a lack of empathy. By extension, a person who allows their dog to attack and bite others without taking responsibility is not living up to Kant’s moral standards.
The fact that Commander, the President’s dog, has bitten Secret Service agents multiple times raises concerns about the President’s responsibility as a pet owner. It is not only a question of the dog’s behavior, but also of the owner’s response. By disclaiming any responsibility for the dog’s actions, President Biden seems to be distancing himself from the consequences of his pet’s aggressive behavior.
While it is true that some animals may display aggression due to fear or stress, it is the owner’s duty to ensure that proper measures are taken to address such behavior. This includes training, socialization, and, in some cases, professional intervention. The White House’s response to Commander’s attacks has been largely dismissive, treating the issue as a public relations problem rather than a serious concern for the safety of the people around him.
Kant’s perspective on the treatment of animals reminds us of the moral obligation we have towards them. It emphasizes the need to consider their well-being and not to exploit or mistreat them for our own benefit. President Biden’s dog controversy highlights a disconnect between his actions and the ethical standards set forth by philosophers like Kant. It raises questions about his ability to demonstrate moral responsibility, both in his personal life and in his role as the leader of a nation.
In conclusion, Immanuel Kant’s philosophy on the treatment of animals provides a valuable framework for evaluating human character and moral responsibility. When viewing President Biden’s handling of his dog’s aggressive behavior, it is evident that there is a clear contradiction between Kant’s ethical perspective and the actions of the President. This raises important questions about the President’s commitment to moral principles and his ability to lead by example.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
