Turley states evidence lacks to impeach Biden.
Jonathan Turley: Insufficient Evidence to Impeach President Joe Biden
In a compelling testimony before Congress on Thursday, George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley argued that the House has not presented enough evidence to justify the impeachment of President Joe Biden.
Turley emphasized the early stage of the impeachment process, highlighting that House Speaker Kevin McCarthy announced a formal inquiry into corruption allegations just weeks ago.
Fox News legal analyst Jonathan Turley, one of the GOP’s impeachment witnesses, says: “I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment… But I also do believe that the House has passed the threshold for an impeachment inquiry.” pic.twitter.com/x3cfYKwr5o
— Justin Baragona (@justinbaragona) September 28, 2023
Turley further stated that he believes the House has met the threshold for an impeachment inquiry into President Biden’s conduct, citing three undeniable facts. He accused Biden of making false statements about foreign business deals, being involved in a multi-million dollar influence peddling scheme, and potentially benefiting from that money.
However, Turley cautioned against jumping to conclusions, emphasizing that these are merely allegations and should not be presumed as impeachable conduct.
In his written testimony, Turley outlined “guardrails” to prevent both major parties from abusing their power. He expressed his dissatisfaction with past presidents’ dishonesty, dating back to James Madison, and stressed the importance of avoiding confirmation bias and standing together before passing judgment based on evidence.
The hearing also featured three other witnesses: forensic accountant Bruce Dubinsky and former Assistant Attorney General Eileen O’Connor, called by the Republican majority, and Michael Gerhardt, a professor of jurisprudence at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, invited by the Democrats.
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer assured that the committee would examine over two dozen pieces of evidence exposing Biden’s alleged corruption and abuse of public office. He pledged that the committee, led by Republicans, would not engage in “witch hunts” based on manufactured allegations without substantial evidence.
While Democrats have dismissed the Biden impeachment inquiry as politically motivated and lacking evidence, the White House has called on the media to support their efforts in fending off the investigation.
What concerns does Turley’s testimony raise about the motivations behind calls for impeachment and the need for a fair and impartial examination of allegations against President Biden
Ry.”
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) September 28, 2022
During his testimony, Turley made it clear that he does not believe there is enough evidence to support articles of impeachment against President Biden. However, he also acknowledged that the House has crossed the threshold for an impeachment inquiry.
Turley’s statement comes in the wake of increasing calls for impeachment from Republican lawmakers, who allege that President Biden has committed acts of corruption. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy initiated a formal inquiry into these allegations just a few weeks ago.
However, Turley argued that the evidence presented thus far is not sufficient to warrant impeachment. He highlighted the need for a thorough investigation and the gathering of more evidence before making any conclusions. Turley stated, “I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment.”
Turley’s testimony sheds light on the procedural stage of the impeachment process. It is essential to follow a fair and comprehensive investigation, gathering all the necessary evidence before proceeding with articles of impeachment. Rushing the process without sufficient evidence could undermine the credibility and legitimacy of the impeachment proceedings, regardless of the political affiliation involved.
Moreover, Turley’s perspective raises questions about the motives behind the impeachment calls. It is crucial to distinguish between legitimate concerns of corruption and politically motivated attacks. Turley’s observation reminds us to tread carefully and adhere to a fair and impartial investigation, ensuring that justice is served and the truth is revealed.
As the impeachment inquiry unfolds, it is essential for lawmakers to keep Turley’s testimony in mind. The pursuit of truth and justice should prevail over partisan agendas. A thorough evaluation of evidence and a fair examination of allegations against President Biden are necessary before any decision regarding impeachment is made.
In conclusion, Jonathan Turley’s testimony before Congress highlights the lack of sufficient evidence to impeach President Joe Biden at this stage. While an impeachment inquiry has been initiated, it is vital to conduct a thorough investigation, gathering more evidence to make a well-informed decision. Rushing the process without proper evidence could undermine the credibility of the proceedings. As this process continues, it is crucial that lawmakers prioritize justice, fairness, and truth above partisan interests, ensuring a legitimate and just outcome for all parties involved.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."