{"id":2685116,"date":"2026-10-15T22:37:35","date_gmt":"2026-10-16T02:37:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/washington-post-now-luring-women-to-onlyfans-suggesting-pay-up-to-1600x-higher-than-what-most-women-make\/"},"modified":"2026-10-15T22:46:39","modified_gmt":"2026-10-16T02:46:39","slug":"washington-post-now-luring-women-to-onlyfans-suggesting-pay-up-to-1600x-higher-than-what-most-women-make","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/washington-post-now-luring-women-to-onlyfans-suggesting-pay-up-to-1600x-higher-than-what-most-women-make\/","title":{"rendered":"Washington Post Now Luring Women to OnlyFans, Suggesting Pay up to 1,600x Higher Than What Most Women Make"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">36<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fwashington-post-now-luring-women-to-onlyfans-suggesting-pay-up-to-1600x-higher-than-what-most-women-make%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2685116&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>the article critiques the Washington Post&#8217;s portrayal of women earning substantial income from OnlyFans, highlighting the misleading nature of their initial claim that some performers earn as much in an hour as a teacher makes in a day. Actual data from OnlyFans\u2019 parent company, Fenix International Ltd., shows that the average creator earns just under $2,500 annually, with the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/karol-markowicz-our-falling-birth-and-marriage-rates-reflect-the-lie-that-only-singles-have-fun\/\" title=\"Karol Markowicz: Our Falling Birth and Marriage Rates Reflect the Lie That Only Singles Have Fun\">median making<\/a> only about $180 per year-far less than the sensational figures suggested by the Post. The piece emphasizes that the small percentage of top-earning creators (fewer than 0.1%) account for most of the platform\u2019s revenue,leaving most creators earning meager amounts. It also discusses the moral and societal implications,criticizing how media narratives can manipulate perceptions and promote harmful ideals. The article advocates trusting in divine provision during financial struggles and warns against prioritizing fleeting luxuries over eternal spiritual rewards.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><br \/>\n<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\"><br \/>\n<?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><html><body><\/p>\n<section> \t\t\t\t<script>console.log(\"ad slot (AC1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC2)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC3)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC4)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_0)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_2)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_3)\")<\/script><\/p>\n<p>I know this is a bold claim, but the Washington Post may have hit a genuinely new level of scummery.<\/p>\n<p>It started un-innocently enough. A substitute teacher got caught making pornographic content on OnlyFans with her husband, though, as the Post so delicately put it, \u201cshe sometimes teams up with others in erotic acts, as well.\u201d Charming.<\/p>\n<p>But that\u2019s not the point. The point is the very first line of the <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.is\/20261011104349\/https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/nation\/2026\/10\/11\/substitute-teacher-fired-over-onlyfans-account-says-business-is-booming\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Post\u2019s article<\/a>: \u201cOne job paid about $140 a day. The other often pays that much in an hour.\u201d<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">Sheena Sittner\u2019s teaching job paid her about $140 a day. OnlyFans often pays that much in an hour.<\/p>\n<p>In September, a contractor removed Sittner from teacher assignments. Ever since news spread of her dismissal, business has been booming. https:\/\/t.co\/QEJyhUPLkH https:\/\/t.co\/4lxbDpdk9m<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/washingtonpost\/status\/2109826480939106620?\">October 13, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.x.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>Shockingly (or not), it turns out that the Post\u2019s opening line is wildly misleading, but don\u2019t take my word for it. Let\u2019s take Fenix International Ltd.\u2019s word. That\u2019s OnlyFans\u2019 UK parent company.<\/p>\n<p>In 2025, Fenix <a href=\"https:\/\/onlyfansstatistics.com\/creators\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">paid out<\/a> about $6.3 billion to a hair over 5 million people, whom they euphemistically call \u201ccreators.\u201d If we do some very <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/breaking-huge-simple-math-shows-biden-claims-13-million-more-votes-than-there-were-eligible-voters-who-voted-in-2020-election\/\" title=\"BREAKING HUGE \u2013 \u2018Simple Math\u2019 Shows Biden Claims 13 MILLION More Votes Than There Were Eligible Voters Who Voted in 2020 Election!\">simple math<\/a> and take into account that only about half of those accounts are active, we find that the <a href=\"https:\/\/onlyfansstatistics.com\/earnings\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">average payout<\/a> is <a href=\"https:\/\/onlyfansstatistics.com\/research\/onlyfans-income-gap\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">just under<\/a> $2,500 per year, or $200 per month.<\/p>\n<p>If you think that average is a bad return on your pornographic time investment, check out the median amount OnlyFans creators make \u2014 that\u2019s a whopping $180 per YEAR. That means half of OnlyFans accounts make $15 per month or less, despite the Post reporting that OnlyFans-ing often pays 9 times that in a single hour.<\/p>\n<p>So let\u2019s say we\u2019ve got another substitute teacher who subs 3 days per week in a 36-week school year at $140\/day. She\u2019s going to gross about $15,000 per year.<\/p>\n<p>Is that a better time investment than OnlyFans? You tell me.<\/p>\n<p>To make that same $15k if you\u2019re at the OnlyFans median or below, you\u2019d have to make pornographic content for 84 years straight. And at some point before 84, those views are gonna drop off \u2026 a lot.<\/p>\n<p>Believe it or not, the narrative the Post set up gets even worse.<\/p>\n<p>Their intro leads women to see not just big, but massive dollar signs. Anyone who takes the Post\u2019s word for it and does the simple math walks away thinking, \u201cGosh, those girls make $300k a year. How can I say no to that?\u201d\u00a0When, in reality, they are far more likely to make around $180 per year, not $300k.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, the Post set up women to think that by violating themselves on camera they can \u201coften\u201d make 1,600 times what most OnlyFans performers really make.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s evil.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s show our work:<\/p>\n<p><em>40 hours per week x 52 weeks per year = 2,080 hours per year<br \/> <\/em><em>2080 hours per year x $140 per hour = $291,000<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Huge sum, right? But we just established that the median OnlyFans income is $180 per year, so\u2026 $291,000 \/ $180\u00a0 =\u00a0 1,618<\/p>\n<p>So the Post\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/3YuVZYV\" >cheery intro line suggests women<\/a> could make 1,600 times more with OnlyFans than they should ever expect \u2026 at best.<\/p>\n<p>And it\u2019s the trap. The ONLY OnlyFans accounts you ever hear about are the ones that rake in hundreds of thousands to millions, and that\u2019s a vanishingly small number.<\/p>\n<p>OnlyFans itself reports that just 5,000 accounts have ever earned more than $1 million across the entire 10 years of the platform\u2019s existence. That\u2019s roughly 0.1 percent, or 1 in every 1,000 accounts. So for every woman who became a millionaire, 1,000 didn\u2019t. And what did they get for their trouble? Shame, embarrassment, disgrace, seared consciences, and maybe an STD or two.<\/p>\n<p>The teacher told the Post, \u201cIt has changed us financially in significant positive ways.\u201d I don\u2019t doubt that. She must be good at the gig for it to have changed their finances, which is good for her bottom line but tragic for her marriage, her children, and her soul.<\/p>\n<p>Now, she\u2019s just one person. How corrosive can the actions of one person be, you ask?<\/p>\n<p>Fyodor Dostoevsky answered that question in \u201cThe Brothers Karamazov.\u201d Through the character of Zosima, he says, \u201cEveryone is really responsible to all men for all men and for everything.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The idea is that we all bear a  of guilt and responsibility for the pain and suffering we all experience, because human lives are so interconnected. In other words, the bad things we do don\u2019t ever affect just us; in theory, they affect everyone.<\/p>\n<p>The Post\u2019s deceitful article is the perfect example of this.<\/p>\n<p>By prostituting herself, more or less literally, this teacher gave the Post grist for an article that lures women into a business that corrupts their souls, harms their relationships, and corrodes culture, and it does that both inside their homes and outside, thanks to the global reach of the internet.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s Dostoevsky come to life.<\/p>\n<p>Democracy may indeed die in darkness. But what of truth and decency when covered in a miasma of misdirection and lies by media outlets like The Washington Post? Nothing good.<\/p>\n<p>So what are women like this teacher to do as they face low incomes, high bills, and limited options to make those ends meet?<\/p>\n<p>Well, Jesus told his disciples to fear nothing because if God takes note of a common sparrow falling, how much more does he watch and care for us? But trusting in God\u2019s provision is hard \u2014 just ask Abraham, Jacob, King David, or the disciples. It\u2019s really almost impossible without the Holy Spirit\u2019s help.<\/p>\n<p>If you\u2019re in a position where you feel like the choice is between going without true essentials or descending into muck and mire designed to satisfy filthy minds, trust God. Follow Him, do as He asks, and then live as if He will provide for you \u2026 because He will.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=2%20Chronicles%2016%3A9&#038;version=ESV\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2 Chronicles 16:9<\/a> says, \u201cThe eyes of the Lord range throughout the earth to strengthen those whose hearts are fully committed to Him,\u201d and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=Psalm%2034%3A10&#038;version=ESV\">Psalm 34:10<\/a> says, \u201cThe young lions suffer want and hunger, but those who seek the Lord lack no good thing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Following God, following Christ may not result in your getting every luxury you want in this life, and it definitely won\u2019t result in an easy life, but it will result in things, as the Apostle Paul wrote, that \u201cno eye has seen, no ear has heard, and no human mind has conceived\u201d in eternity.<\/p>\n<p>And eternity will make our time here on Earth, with these trite little luxuries that break, corrode, and get stolen, feel like the blink of a hummingbird\u2019s eye.<\/p>\n<p>Don\u2019t trade the good God has for you in the future for the junk Satan offers you now. A $300,000 income isn\u2019t worth it. And $180 certainly isn\u2019t worth it.<\/p>\n<p>Regardless, you\u2019ll regret it, and eternity is a long, long time.<\/p>\n<div style=\"background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #171717; display: flex;font-size: 16px;font-weight: 600;line-height: 1.5;margin: 24px 0;padding: 18px 20px 18px 30px;text-align: left;\">\n<div style=\"align-self: stretch;border-left: 3px solid #171717;flex-shrink: 0;padding-left: 20px;\"><\/div>\n<p><a style=\"text-decoration: none;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/preferences\/source?q=https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/\">Choose The Western Journal as your preferred source on Google and never miss reporting that defends truth, protects freedom, and advances Western civilization<\/a><\/div>\n<p style=\"border: 1px solid #f5f5f5; padding: 16px;\">Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/advertise-us\/?wj_source=article\">Advertise Today<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position: relative;\">\n<div class=\"ff-fancy-header-container\"> \t\t\t \t<\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-submit-correction inner-content\">\n<div class=\"correction-form\">\n<form style=\"display: none;\">\n<div class=\"sc-name-field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* Name<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"name\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<div class=\"sc--field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* <\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<label>* Message<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t<textarea name=\"message\" required><\/textarea> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"required-message\" style=\"display: none; padding-bottom: 15px;\">* All fields are required.<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"submit\" value=\"Submit\" onclick=\"event.preventDefault(); firefly_sc();\"> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"firefly-sc-confirm\" style=\"display: none;\">Success!<\/div>\n<\/p><\/form>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p> \t\t<script> \t\t\tfunction firefly_sc() { \t\t\t\tif( typeof window.captchaPublicKey == typeof undefined ){ \t\t\t\t\tconsole.error('window.captchaPublicKey is not defined'); \t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\tgrecaptcha.execute( window.captchaPublicKey, { action: 'submit_correction' } ).then( function( token ) { \t\t\t\t\tvar opts = { \t\t\t\t\t\taction:    'firefly_sc_submit', \t\t\t\t\t\tname:      document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"name\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\t:     document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tmessage:   document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"message\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tpost_id:   firefly_post_id, \t\t\t\t\t\tcap_token: token \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tvar inputs = [ 'name', '', 'message' ];  \t\t\t\t\tfor( var i = 0; i < inputs.length; i++ ) if( ! ( opts[inputs[i]] = document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"' + inputs[i] + '\"]' ).value ) ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .required-message' ).style.display = 'block'; \t\t\t\t\t\treturn; \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction input[type=\"submit\"]' ).style.display = 'none'; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).src = firefly_loading_gif_url; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display = 'inline-block';  \t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( 'ma subbing' );  \t\t\t\t\tif( firefly_post_id ) opts['post_id'] = firefly_post_id;  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Send the data using post with element id name and name2*\/ \t\t\t\t\tvar posting = jQuery.post( firefly_ajax_url, opts );  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Alerts the results *\/ \t\t\t\t\tposting.done( function( response ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tif( response.success ) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( response.data ); \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display = 'none'; \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-confirm' ).style.display = 'block';  \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdataLayer.push( { 'event': 'submit-correction' } ); \t\t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t} \t\t<\/script> \t     \t\t\t\t\t\t     \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t<script>console.log(\"ad slot (BA1)\")<\/script> \t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"ff-fancy-header-container\"> \t\t\t \t<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<p><\/body><\/html><\/p>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Washington Post&#8217;s claim is shocking, but their reporting may be even more misleading than it appears. It all began with a seemingly simple story: a substitute teacher was caught creating adult content on OnlyFans with her husband, and the Post noted she sometimes collaborates with others in such acts. The article highlighted that her teaching job paid about $140 daily, while OnlyFans often pays that much per hour. Since September, she\u2019s been removed from teaching assignments, and since then, her online earnings have surged.<\/p>\n<p>However, this initial impression is far from accurate. According to Fenix International Ltd., OnlyFans\u2019 UK parent company, in 2025 they paid out roughly $6.3 billion to over 5 million creators-averaging just under $2,500 annually or about $200 monthly for active accounts. The median earnings are only around $180 per year; half of creators make less than $15 monthly despite stories suggesting they earn thousands per hour.<\/p>\n<p>To compare: a substitute teacher working three days weekly at $140\/day for 36 weeks earns approximately $15,000 annually-far more consistent income than the typical OnlyFans creator\u2019s median earnings. To match that via median-only earnings on OnlyFans would require producing content for over 80 years without significant viewership decline.<\/p>\n<p>The Post\u2019s narrative also inflates potential earnings dramatically. Their opening implies women could make up to 1,600 times what most creators earn by doing explicit content-an outright misrepresentation since only a tiny fraction of top earners reach such levels (about 0.1%). Most accounts earn very little; the idea that women can easily make hundreds of thousands or millions is false and misleading.<\/p>\n<p>This distortion encourages women to believe they can achieve extraordinary wealth through such activities when reality shows otherwise-most will never come close to those figures and risk shame or health issues instead.<\/p>\n<p>In essence, the Post\u2019s portrayal exploits fears and hopes alike-painting an overly glamorous picture of online adult work while hiding its true scarcity and risks-and thereby contributing to cultural harm rooted in misinformation and moral compromise<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2685117,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/OnlyFans-lie.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[33651],"tags":[87313,16726,40614,5605,36600],"class_list":["post-2685116","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-western-journal","tag-income-earnings","tag-onlyfans","tag-social-media-trends","tag-women","tag-women-empowerment"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/OnlyFans-lie.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2685116","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2685116"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2685116\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2685129,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2685116\/revisions\/2685129"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2685117"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2685116"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2685116"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2685116"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}