{"id":2636499,"date":"2026-07-28T08:36:58","date_gmt":"2026-07-28T12:36:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/utm_sourcerssutm_mediumrssutm_campaigntransparency-should-apply-to-all-forms-of-medicare-insurance\/"},"modified":"2026-07-28T08:51:01","modified_gmt":"2026-07-28T12:51:01","slug":"utm_sourcerssutm_mediumrssutm_campaigntransparency-should-apply-to-all-forms-of-medicare-insurance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/utm_sourcerssutm_mediumrssutm_campaigntransparency-should-apply-to-all-forms-of-medicare-insurance\/","title":{"rendered":"Transparency Should Apply To All Forms Of Medicare Insurance"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">18<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Futm_sourcerssutm_mediumrssutm_campaigntransparency-should-apply-to-all-forms-of-medicare-insurance%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2636499&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>Congress is actively considering measures to enhance transparency in healthcare, aiming to empower patients with better details to make informed choices and foster competition that can reduce costs. One such legislation, approved by the House Ways and Means Committee, is the Medicare Advantage MLR Transparency Act (H.R.9644), wich mandates publicly available, user-pleasant reporting of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/unitedhealth-beats-quarterly-profit-estimates-on-lower-than-feared-costs\/\" title=\"UnitedHealth surpasses profit expectations for the quarter due to ... than anticipated.\">medical loss ratio<\/a> (MLR) data-showing what portion of premiums are spent on actual health care versus administrative costs and profits-for Medicare Advantage plans. <\/p>\n<p>Though, this transparency requirement currently excludes stand-alone Medicare Part D plans and Medigap (Medicare supplemental insurance), despite the fact that many seniors purchase Medigap to cover costs traditional medicare does not, frequently enough resulting in inefficient and costly coverage. Medigap plans tend to have a lower minimum MLR (65%) and are more expensive as they mainly serve as pre-paid health care rather than true insurance,encouraging overuse of services and driving higher costs for the Medicare system.<\/p>\n<p>Reform advocates argue that increasing transparency around Medigap costs could highlight questionable practices, such as the influence of organizations like AARP and UnitedHealth Group, which benefit financially from high premiums and royalty arrangements. Critics suggest that disclosing Medigap\u2019s costs could lead to reduced premiums, less overuse of marginal services, and overall savings for seniors and taxpayers.<\/p>\n<p>Some experts note that existing law caps insurers\u2019 profits as a percentage of premiums, which can incentivize higher premiums, and recommend extending transparency requirements to Medigap and Part D plans to ensure consumers can better assess the value of thier coverage. Increased transparency is seen as a step toward making the Medicare program more efficient,limiting unneeded spending,and protecting seniors from exploitative practices. congress is encouraged to adopt these measures promptly for the benefit of consumers and the government.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>In various committee hearings and markups, Congress continues exploring actions to expand transparency for health care consumers. Such measures hold the potential to give patients the information they need to select their health care options wisely, generating competition that can bring down costs. <\/p>\n<p>However, the success of transparency efforts depends upon those measures getting applied evenly and broadly. When it comes to Medicare, that means Congress should ensure seniors have information on all types of insurance policies they can purchase.<\/p>\n<p>Recently, the House Ways and Means Committee <a href=\"https:\/\/waysandmeans.house.gov\/event\/markup-of-h-r-9641-h-r-3108-h-r-9642-h-r-9468-h-r-3514-h-r-9644-and-h-r-9645\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">marked up<\/a> several pieces of health-related legislation. Among the bills the committee approved was <a href=\"https:\/\/waysandmeans.house.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/HR-9644-AINS.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">H.R. 9644<\/a>, the Medicare Advantage MLR Transparency Act.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMLR\u201d refers to the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/crs_external_products\/R\/PDF\/R42735\/R42735.19.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">medical loss ratio<\/a> \u2014 the percentage of premium dollars spent on delivering health care benefits, as opposed to administrative overhead and profit. Under the <a href=\"https:\/\/housedocs.house.gov\/energycommerce\/ppacacon.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">reconciliation law<\/a> Democrats passed in 2010 to \u201cfix\u201d Obamacare, Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D prescription drug plans already have a minimum requirement for an 85 percent MLR \u2014 that is, they may spend no more than 15 cents of every premium dollar on overhead and profits.<\/p>\n<p>While insurers already report their MLR information, they do not widely publicize those data. H.R. 9644 would require public online reporting of MLR data \u201cin a consumer-friendly format,\u201d as part of a package of information Medicare Advantage insurers would be required to disclose. In supporting the proposal, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo., <a href=\"https:\/\/waysandmeans.house.gov\/2026\/07\/15\/chairman-smith-opening-statement-markup-of-legislation-expanding-access-to-quality-more-affordable-health-care-holding-health-care-empires-accountable\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">claimed<\/a> that \u201cseniors and taxpayers deserve to know this information before they hand over their money.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But the legislation does not apply the new MLR transparency requirements to stand-alone Medicare Part D plans or to Medigap (i.e., Medicare supplemental) insurance. Many seniors enrolled in traditional Medicare (as opposed to Medicare Advantage) purchase Medigap plans to offset the cost of expenses that traditional Medicare does not cover.<\/p>\n<p>Congress shouldn\u2019t exempt Part D and Medigap plans from MLR transparency. For starters, Medigap is an inefficient form of health insurance \u2014 in fact, many conservatives would argue that most Medigap coverage isn\u2019t really insurance at all.<\/p>\n<p>In many cases, Medigap plans represent not \u201cinsurance\u201d \u2014 that is, financial protection in the event of an unplanned, catastrophic event like a heart attack \u2014 but pre-paid health care. Many seniors purchase Medigap coverage because they do not like paying the 20 percent co-insurance that traditional Medicare requires for many services.<\/p>\n<p>That dynamic makes Medigap coverage inefficient on two levels. When most Medigap claims are for comparatively minor matters \u2014 for instance, the beneficiary\u2019s share of a physician visit, which might come to $20 or $30 \u2014 administrative and overhead costs will eat up a larger share of premium dollars. That explains why Medigap plans have a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/crs_external_products\/R\/PDF\/R42735\/R42735.19.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">minimum medical loss ratio of 65%<\/a>, versus an 85 percent required MLR for Medicare Advantage plans.<\/p>\n<p>Just as important: Because Medigap coverage insulates beneficiaries from the cost-sharing that traditional Medicare normally charges, it encourages seniors to over-consume care in ways that raise expenses to Medicare (meaning taxpayers). Put more simply, Medigap represents yet another example of how <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/are-medical-mistakes-the-leading-cause-of-death-in-the-u-s\/\" title=\"Are Medical Mistakes the Leading Cause of Death in the U.S.?\">expensive health care<\/a> gets when it\u2019s \u201cfree.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kff.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/8208.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">2011 paper<\/a> by the Kaiser Family Foundation quantified the cost of these inefficiencies. The analysis concluded that reforming Medigap plans to require greater beneficiary cost-sharing would actually save money for seniors and the Medicare program. Nearly four in five (79%) Medicare beneficiaries would pay less \u2014 an average of $416 less per year, even after taking into account higher out-of-pocket spending on co-payments and deductibles \u2014 while Medicare program spending itself would fall by $4.6 billion annually. (Both numbers would likely be higher at 2026 spending levels.) The savings would come because 1) fewer premium dollars would get run through inefficient Medigap insurers and 2) seniors would spend less money consuming \u201cfree,\u201d but marginally useful or even harmful, health services.<\/p>\n<p>Making clear how much of seniors\u2019 Medigap premium dollars go towards actual health expenses would also highlight the questionable business practices of one of the nation\u2019s largest senior organizations. To wit, it would illustrate to seniors how much they personally pay due to the unholy alliance between AARP and UnitedHealth Group, the nation\u2019s largest insurer.<\/p>\n<p>As I have outlined in a <a href=\"https:\/\/commitmenttoseniors.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/C2S-Chris-Jacobs-Report-2026.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">series<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.americancommitment.org\/app\/uploads\/2025\/10\/CTS-AARP-Memo-2025.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">reports<\/a> for <a href=\"https:\/\/commitmenttoseniors.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/C2S-AARP-Report-2025.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">American Commitment<\/a>, AARP makes most of its revenue not from membership dues, but from \u201croyalty fees\u201d associated with selling products to seniors. The largest share of AARP\u2019s \u201croyalty fees\u201d comes from UnitedHealth, and its Medigap plan brings with it a particularly pernicious twist.<\/p>\n<p>When it comes to the AARP-UnitedHealth Medigap offering, AARP\u2019s \u201croyalty fee\u201d equals 5.95 percent of each premium dollar paid. The arrangement means that AARP has an incentive to sell Medigap plans that seniors may not want or need, and to sell the most expensive plans available. It also gives AARP an incentive to raise rather than lower premiums, because AARP wins \u2014 it generates more \u201croyalty fees\u201d \u2014 when seniors lose by paying more out-of-pocket for their coverage.<\/p>\n<p>At the time Obamacare passed, many conservative policy experts \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/wordpress.juniperresearchgroup.com\/2009\/11\/03\/legislative-bulletin-h-r-3962-speaker-pelosis-government-takeover-of-health-care\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">including this one<\/a> \u2014 argued that the medical loss ratio provisions would encourage premium increases. If the law caps profits as a percentage of premium dollars, then insurers can only raise their profits by raising premiums, as 15 percent profit on a $200 monthly premium obviously exceeds a 15 percent profit on a $100 premium.<\/p>\n<p>That said, Congress has shown little desire to repeal the MLR provision (or, for that matter, any other element of Obamacare). If Washington intends to retain the metric, then lawmakers should ensure that consumers have ways to access that information as one potential data point regarding their insurance plan\u2019s value. And if Congress wants to require disclosure of Medicare Advantage plans\u2019 MLR, then it should do the same for Medigap and Part D plans too.<\/p>\n<p>Extending Medicare Advantage transparency requirements in H.R. 9644 to Medigap supplemental insurance would have several salutary effects. It would show seniors how much of their premium dollar goes to waste, in the form of administrative overhead, rather than paying for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/doj-vows-to-appeal-court-ruling-against-cdcs-eviction-moratorium\/\" title=\"DOJ Vows To Appeal Court Ruling Against CDC\u2019s Eviction Moratorium\">health care expenses<\/a>. It would also help to expose how one of the largest Medigap plans, AARP\/UnitedHealth, overcharges seniors to line AARP\u2019s bottom line.<\/p>\n<p>At worst this transparency might prompt insurers to become more efficient \u2014 and for AARP to practice what it preaches, both with regards to transparency and serving seniors\u2019 interests (as opposed to AARP\u2019s bottom line). At best, it could encourage seniors to ditch Medigap coverage entirely, which might result in lower costs for the Medicare program. In any event, it\u2019s a no-lose proposition, one that Congress should embrace sooner rather than later.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<div>\n<p>      Chris Jacobs is founder and CEO of Juniper Research Group and author of the book &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/dp\/1645720020\">The Case Against Single Payer<\/a>.&#8221; He is on Twitter: <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/chrisjacobsHC\">@chrisjacobsHC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Congress pushes for broader health care transparency to empower consumers<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":521,"featured_media":2636500,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/pexels-mikhail-nilov-7735626-e1784815682688.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[33651],"tags":[4606,8322,4159,12404],"class_list":["post-2636499","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-western-journal","tag-healthcare","tag-insurance","tag-medicare","tag-transparency"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/pexels-mikhail-nilov-7735626-e1784815682688.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2636499","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/521"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2636499"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2636499\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2636516,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2636499\/revisions\/2636516"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2636500"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2636499"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2636499"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2636499"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}