{"id":2632528,"date":"2026-07-20T08:17:57","date_gmt":"2026-07-20T12:17:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-trump-administrations-proposed-grant-reform-may-lead-to-more-earmarks\/"},"modified":"2026-07-20T08:25:32","modified_gmt":"2026-07-20T12:25:32","slug":"the-trump-administrations-proposed-grant-reform-may-lead-to-more-earmarks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-trump-administrations-proposed-grant-reform-may-lead-to-more-earmarks\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump Admin&#8217;s Proposed Grant Reform May Lead To Earmarks"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">18<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fthe-trump-administrations-proposed-grant-reform-may-lead-to-more-earmarks%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2632528&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>The Trump governance proposed a new federal rule aimed at increasing presidential adn Congressional control over federal grants. If finalized, this rule would shift decision-making authority from the bureaucratic agencies to political leaders, requiring them to approve all grants and allowing the administration to terminate grants unilaterally. This move aligns with recent Supreme Court decisions to reassert political branch authority and responds to lawsuits from the previous administration. Supporters argue it enhances transparency and accountability by making grant decisions more politically accountable, potentially allowing Congress to pursue earmarks directly. critics fear it could lead to increased earmarking and higher spending, undermining fiscal obligation. Despite these changes, overall federal spending remains high, and the rule alone won&#8217;t solve the larger issue of government overspending, which requires broader political accountability.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>The Trump administration proposed a federal rule earlier this year that would give the executive branch more control over federal grants. The comment period on the rule recently closed, but if it gets finalized, it will have significant implications for the federal government.<\/p>\n<p>The changes would drive accountability for decision-making in grant programs back to political players and away from the unelected bureaucracy. However, they could also lead to an increase in congressional earmarks, which are associated with higher spending and institutional corruption.<\/p>\n<p>In addition to making some minor and clerical alterations, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/05\/29\/2026-10817\/regulation-for-federal-financial-assistance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">rule<\/a> proposed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) contains several significant policy changes to the grant-making process. To start with, political officials would have the final sign-off on all grant approvals. In addition, grant recipients would be required to acknowledge that an administration can terminate a grant without warning due to a change in policy priorities.<\/p>\n<p>The first change is in line with a series of <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/07\/10\/supreme-courts-blows-to-the-administrative-state-are-wins-for-democracy\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Supreme Court rulings<\/a> in recent years, which have attempted to take <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/how-britney-spears-retook-control-of-her-life-and-what-her-victory-could-mean-for-others\/\" title=\"How Britney Spears Retook ... Of Her Life (And What Her Victory Could Mean For Others)\">decision-making powers<\/a> away from the institutional bureaucracy and restore those powers to the political (i.e., executive and legislative) branches. The second change responds to the numerous lawsuits the second Trump Administration faced after it terminated various grants upon taking office last year, and seeks to make it easier for future administrations to align their spending goals with their policy priorities.<\/p>\n<p>The OMB proposal has generated predictable outrage from leftists, who believe that requiring political officials to sign off on grants will undermine \u201cscience.\u201d But another possible ramification came when OMB Director Russ Vought <a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/live-updates\/2026\/06\/30\/congress\/vought-vows-to-honor-earmarks-00981681\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">recently testified<\/a> before a House Appropriations Committee <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.house.gov\/Committee\/Calendar\/ByEvent.aspx?EventID=119415\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">hearing<\/a> that the congressional earmarking process would be unaffected by the proposed rule: \u201csometimes you have an earmark to a specific person or a specific organization, and that would probably be at the top of the list that needs to be funded.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Having worked for Vought in a past life, I would characterize him as skeptical (at best) of earmarks in general. But his admission that OMB will continue to honor earmark requests raises an obvious question: Will the rule, if finalized as proposed, lead to an explosion of congressional earmarks, with competitive grant programs replaced by long lists of congressionally-directed spending projects, so that lawmakers can ensure the projects they want to get funded do so?<\/p>\n<p>While I haven\u2019t spoken with Vought about the proposed rule (and the views in this article are, as always, my own), the rule\u2019s supporters might view this scenario as both a potential feature and a potential bug. The summary says that the rule \u201cwould improve transparency, accountability, and oversight for federal awards across the federal government.\u201d Requiring politically appointed officials \u2014 whom the president can fire at will \u2014 to approve or deny grants will ensure that all spending decisions are made by individuals who (through the president) are ultimately accountable to the electorate.<\/p>\n<p>In this vein, converting grant programs into congressional earmarks would also improve transparency and accountability. If Congress wants to spend money on Bridges to Nowhere \u2014 or even grants for things like transgender clinics \u2014 in specific lawmakers\u2019 districts, they should have that right. But then those lawmakers would, and should, face accountability to the voters in the next election for wasting taxpayer dollars on questionable and\/or harmful projects.<\/p>\n<p>The latter option comes with a risk, however. Conservatives have often called earmarks a \u201cgateway drug\u201d to higher spending \u2014 that, for instance, a wavering member of Congress will vote for a porked-up spending bill he otherwise would not have supported because his earmarks are included within it. If the rule leads to an increase in earmarks, this type of scenario could well happen.<\/p>\n<p>That said, neither Congress nor this administration have exactly set the world ablaze when it comes to fiscal responsibility. Even before the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/education-department-proposal-would-flood-public-schools-with-woke-curricula\/\" title=\"Education Department Proposal Would Flood Public Schools With Woke Curricula\">rule takes effect<\/a>, annual deficits <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2026\/03\/12\/we-could-completely-get-rid-of-social-security-and-it-still-wouldnt-balance-the-u-s-budget\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">remain near $2 trillion<\/a>. Moreover, <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2026\/04\/14\/trumps-modest-budget-cuts-mean-nothing-if-he-wont-touch-rampant-entitlements\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">few entitlement reform proposals<\/a> made it into this year\u2019s OMB budget, suggesting this failed\u00a0status quo\u00a0won\u2019t change any time soon. Assuming the proposed rule gets finalized, it should accomplish its objective of increasing transparency and accountability regarding where and how federal spending gets allocated. (That is, before the next Democratic administration significantly modifies or repeals it outright.) But it won\u2019t solve the larger problem of the federal government spending far too much money to begin with. To fix that problem, voters need to hold lawmakers of <em>both<\/em> parties accountable \u2014 and the sooner the better.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<div>\n<p>      Chris Jacobs is founder and CEO of Juniper Research Group and author of the book &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/dp\/1645720020\">The Case Against Single Payer<\/a>.&#8221; He is on Twitter: <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/chrisjacobsHC\">@chrisjacobsHC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Trump&#8217;s grant rule shifts control to executive branch<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":521,"featured_media":2632529,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/P20260527DT-0684_President_Donald_J._Trump_holds_a_cabinet_meeting-e1784225420475.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[33651],"tags":[9405,36513,5045],"class_list":["post-2632528","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-western-journal","tag-earmarks","tag-federal-funding","tag-government"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/P20260527DT-0684_President_Donald_J._Trump_holds_a_cabinet_meeting-e1784225420475.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2632528","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/521"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2632528"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2632528\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2632532,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2632528\/revisions\/2632532"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2632529"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2632528"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2632528"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2632528"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}