{"id":2622781,"date":"2026-07-02T09:39:55","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T13:39:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/scotus-win-for-trump-admin-should-motivate-us-to-eliminate-tps-completely\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T09:42:52","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T13:42:52","slug":"scotus-win-for-trump-admin-should-motivate-us-to-eliminate-tps-completely","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/scotus-win-for-trump-admin-should-motivate-us-to-eliminate-tps-completely\/","title":{"rendered":"SCOTUS Win For Admin Should Motivate Us To Eliminate TPS"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"float:left\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">20<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fscotus-win-for-trump-admin-should-motivate-us-to-eliminate-tps-completely%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2622781&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>The Trump administration achieved a legal victory through the Supreme Court in Mullin v. Doe,where a 6-3 conservative majority upheld the president\u2019s decision to rescind temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians and Syrians,removing these nationals from U.S. communities. The case centered on whether executive decisions about foreign countries&#8217; eligibility for TPS are judicially reviewable; the Court affirmed that such determinations are non-reviewable, aligning with the explicit language of the TPS statute. Justice Alito emphasized that TPS has frequently enough become a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/not-so-temporary-how-tps-lets-foreigners-stay-in-the-us-for-years\/\" title=\"Not-so &#039;temporary&#039;: How ... lets foreigners stay in the US for years\">de facto permanent status<\/a>, undermining its original intent, and praised trump&#8217;s efforts to restrict lengthy TPS designations.<\/p>\n<p>Lower courts had repeatedly blocked the administration&#8217;s attempts to terminate TPS designations, despite Supreme Court rulings favoring the executive\u2019s authority, illustrating ongoing judicial obstruction. The district court\u2019s earlier relief for Haitian plaintiffs was based on a supposed constitutional race-based discrimination claim, citing President Trump&#8217;s past comments on Haiti. However,the Supreme Court dismissed this,arguing that the president&#8217;s remarks do not constitute racial discrimination under the law,and that immigration decisions inherently involve distinctions among nationalities.<\/p>\n<p>Justice thomas further argued that anti-discrimination principles do not extend to non-citizens\u2019 immigration rights, since the Constitution does not guarantee equal protection for foreigners, and that immigration laws have always differentiated based on nationality. He contended that applying anti-discrimination standards to immigration law is misguided and could lead to open borders, which the political left seems to favor.<\/p>\n<p>The decision highlights the flaws in current immigration laws and the judiciary\u2019s role, suggesting that the real solution involves legislative reforms. It exposes concerns over the abuse of the TPS program and advocates for repealing the relevant statutes to restore sovereignty and prevent future exploitation. The article stresses that America should not serve as a global refuge simply because other nations are less stable, urging a focus on national interests over international mandates or moral blackmail.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>The Trump administration just received another win from the Supreme Court on Thursday in the case of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/25pdf\/25-1083_f204.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Mullin v. Doe<\/em><\/a><em>, <\/em>in which a 6-3 conservative majority on the court upheld the president\u2019s decision to rescind Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians and Syrians who had been previously permitted to reside in the\u00a0U.S.\u00a0Correcting former the abuse of TPS under the Biden administration and removing the Haitians from American communities such as Springfield, Ohio, was a key campaign pledge from Donald Trump and JD Vance in 2024, memorably marked by Trump\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/KatieMiller\/status\/2070158180936568954\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">colorful comments about the predatory dietary habits of the invaders<\/a>.   <\/p>\n<p>The entire case hung upon the question of whether executive determinations\u00a0and designations\u00a0about the status of foreign countries\u00a0(whether or not\u00a0those countries should be eligible\u00a0for Temporary Protected Status in the U.S.)\u00a0are judicially reviewable.\u00a0Arguably, this\u00a0case should never have reached the Supreme Court, given the\u00a0TPS\u00a0statute explicitly\u00a0states\u00a0that\u00a0the determinations of the executive (made through the Secretary of Homeland Security) are non-reviewable by the judiciary.\u00a0Justice Samuel\u00a0Alito\u2019s opinion upheld this common-sense interpretation, concluding that the plaintiffs could not\u00a0proceed\u00a0with their case.\u00a0As\u00a0determined\u00a0by President Trump\u2019s\u00a0secretary of Homeland Security, the\u00a0Haitians\u00a0and Syrians (as well\u00a0as\u00a0foreign nationals from\u00a0nearly a\u00a0dozen other countries) will no longer receive TPS and are thus eligible for removal from the U.S. to their home countries or to third countries.   <\/p>\n<p>In his opinion, Alito deftly noted that despite the promise that TPS would grant a \u201ctemporary\u201d status, it has more often than not effectively been a <em>permanent <\/em>status.\u00a0President Trump\u00a0saw this as a betrayal of the American people\u00a0by means of a procedural loophole and sought to rectify the abuses, as Alito summarized:\u00a0\u201cThe current administration objects to lengthy TPS designations and adopted a new, restricted approach shortly after the beginning of President Trump\u2019s second term in office\u00a0\u2026\u00a0Under this approach, the Secretary of Homeland Security has\u00a0terminated\u00a0every TPS designation that has come up for renewal, 13 in all.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>We\u00a0have here\u00a0an\u00a0absurd\u00a0scenario in which the courts, despite being tasked with interpreting and applying the written laws, looked at\u00a0the text and decided it did not apply to them because\u00a0they judged these plaintiffs\u00a0had some constitutional right being threatened.\u00a0Despite the Supreme Court already siding with President Trump twice and staying two orders from lower courts that were intended to block executive actions, the lower courts continued their obstruction: \u201cNevertheless, lower courts, including those in the cases now before us, have continued to block the Secretary\u2019s attempted terminations of other TPS\u00a0designations.\u201d\u00a0These are yet more examples of the <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/StephenM\/status\/1906842589002629364\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">insanity of leftist\u00a0lower court\u00a0judges<\/a> relentlessly\u00a0seeking\u00a0to block\u00a0actions taken by the Trump administration, regardless\u00a0of whether there is any sound legal basis to do so.   <\/p>\n<h2><strong>Constitutional Claims and Anti-Racism?<\/strong> <\/h2>\n<p>The district court\u2019s decision to grant relief to the Haitian plaintiffs was based upon the court\u2019s conclusion that they were likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that they were victims of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/supreme-court-smacks-down-rampant-race-based-gerrymandering\/\" title=\"SCOTUS Smacks Down Rampant Race-... Gerrymandering\">unconstitutional race-based discrimination<\/a>. The evidence for such a claim? President Trump previously made mean remarks about Haiti and other third world countries, most notably calling them \u201csh*t hole countries.\u201d\u00a0Alito\u2019s Supreme Court opinion\u00a0attempted\u00a0to explain how the president\u2019s comments and his decisions regarding TPS were driven by legitimate facts about country conditions and not by racist discrimination, even mentioning\u00a0Haitians\u2019\u00a0alleged positive \u201ccontributions\u201d to America. Ergo, there\u00a0isn\u2019t\u00a0evidence of racial\u00a0discrimination,\u00a0the plaintiffs are likely to lose on the merits of that claim, and so\u00a0they\u2019re\u00a0not entitled to relief.   <\/p>\n<p>While the holding of the decision is favorable to Trump, this\u00a0exercise in anti-racism is ridiculous.\u00a0While anti-discrimination was\u00a0basically <a href=\"https:\/\/claremontreviewofbooks.com\/the-law-that-ate-the-constitution\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">incorporated into the Constitution and the American legal system<\/a> because of the\u00a0Civil Rights\u00a0Acts and\u00a0accompanying\u00a0court decisions,\u00a0it is nowhere to be found in the\u00a0original Constitution or amendments.\u00a0Even if the\u00a0Fourteenth\u00a0Amendment\u2019s \u201cequal protection\u201d clause is about\u00a0anti-discrimination (<a href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1100121\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">which\u00a0is arguably a very bad interpretation of the clause<\/a>), there is no reason\u00a0to extend those guarantees to non-citizens, as Justice Clarence Thomas noted in his concurrence.\u00a0Thomas writes further, \u201cThe termination of Haiti\u2019s TPS designation does not deprive respondents of\u00a0\u2018life, liberty, or property,\u2019\u00a0so they have no claim <em>even if<\/em> the words\u00a0\u2018due process\u2019\u00a0implicitly\u00a0forbid\u00a0discriminatory animus\u201d (emphasis added).  <\/p>\n<p>How can a country avoid discriminating\u00a0with regard to\u00a0non-citizens when constructing immigration and naturalization laws? Thomas writes, \u201c[Foreigners] have never been guaranteed a right to immigration status or citizenship based on equal protection principles, even when these laws were openly discriminatory [citing 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act] \u2026\u00a0\u00a0our immigration laws have distinguished among aliens based on their national origin from the beginning.\u201d\u00a0As Thomas notes, the entire standard of anti-discrimination is\u00a0absurd, since\u00a0it is impossible to construct immigration and naturalization laws that do not distinguish and discriminate based on ethnicity and country of origin.\u00a0Subjecting immigration law to the standard of anti-discrimination effectively means open borders, which\u00a0seems to be exactly\u00a0what the left wants.   <\/p>\n<h2><strong>Takeaway<\/strong> <\/h2>\n<p><em>Mullin v. Doe, <\/em>while an excellent win for the Trump administration and paving the way for more removals,\u00a0serves a valuable purpose in highlighting the absurdity of our current immigration\u00a0laws, our judiciary, and our alleged \u201cconstitutional\u201d interpretation.\u00a0In other words, the fact that we are even debating these questions in court shows how bad the problem is. When motivated by ideological\u00a0fanaticism,\u00a0the\u00a0left will\u00a0distort and abuse any procedure, law, or judicial function. Even if the text of the law is against them, that will not stop them.   <\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, the 1990 statute defers to executive discretion not judicial interference, which here is a great boon for an immigration restrictionist like President Trump. However, the details surrounding this case should highlight the problematic nature of the TPS legal status, which is ripe for abuse and has been routinely abused for decades. Why should the executive be\u00a0permitted\u00a0to open the borders to untold amounts of immigrants from (likely) third world countries just because their country conditions are worse than ours? Why should the executive <em>ever<\/em> be\u00a0permitted\u00a0to have that\u00a0option\u00a0in his back pocket?\u00a0In this case, executive discretion is on our side, but executive discretion also\u00a0permitted\u00a0President Biden to abuse TPS with no judicial review interfering.   <\/p>\n<p>We <a href=\"https:\/\/americanmind.org\/salvo\/conservatives-lose-even-when-scotus-grants-them-wins\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">should not look to the judiciary to save us anyway<\/a>, and we must work to legislatively repeal the 1990 Immigration Act and the entire TPS program.\u00a0The only way to complete President Trump\u2019s reforms, regain American sovereignty, and ensure we\u00a0don\u2019t\u00a0witness\u00a0abuses of TPS once again is to shut down the questionable program completely.   <\/p>\n<p>America need not be a global <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/StephenM\/status\/2069155319998001588\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">refugee\u00a0dumping ground<\/a> simply because the rest of the world is more dysfunctional than\u00a0us.\u00a0Our children need not be disinherited just because\u00a0other people in other countries are born into less fortunate circumstances.\u00a0It\u2019s\u00a0time we reject the moral blackmail imposed on us\u00a0for too long\u00a0and\u00a0instead\u00a0full-throatedly\u00a0defend the interests of our people.   <\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>      Samuel Kimzey is a doctoral student at Hillsdale College and a 2025 Publius Fellow at the Claremont Institute. He holds a B.A. in History and Christian Studies from Bluefield College and an M.A. in Humanities from the University of Dallas, and previously taught at Valley Classical School in Blacksburg, Virginia. Find him on X <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/SamuelMKimzey\" target=\"_blank\">@SamuelMKimzey<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court backs Trump on TPS rescission for Haitians, Syrians<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3922,"featured_media":2622782,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/4352986286_5a614dc317_o-scaled-e1782767330295.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[63912,36382,33335,32275,52619],"class_list":["post-2622781","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-administrative-law","tag-immigration-policy","tag-legal-victory","tag-supreme-court","tag-temporary-protected-status"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/4352986286_5a614dc317_o-scaled-e1782767330295.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2622781","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3922"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2622781"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2622781\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2622785,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2622781\/revisions\/2622785"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2622782"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2622781"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2622781"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2622781"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}