The article discusses a recent Supreme Court decision that interprets the Fourteenth Amendment as granting birthright citizenship to children born in the United States, including those of illegal immigrants and individuals exploiting the law through schemes like birth tourism. It highlights that the Court’s ruling is based on the original language of the amendment, wich was intended to grant citizenship to freed slaves after the Civil War, but is now being applied broadly to all individuals born on U.S. soil. <\/p>\n

The piece emphasizes that the Constitution is designed to be amendable by the people and their representatives, not solely interpreted by the judiciary. In response to the Court’s ruling, the Department of Justice issued a memorandum prioritizing the examination and prosecution of birth tourism schemes<\/a>, advocating for charges like visa fraud, wire fraud, identity theft, and conspiracy. <\/p>\n

It advocates for Congress and the President to act to address the issue, asserting that the power to define and enforce citizenship laws resides<\/a> with elected officials, not the courts alone. The article underscores that the Constitution creates the judicial branch as co-equal, but not final arbiter of constitutional interpretation, suggesting that legislative action is necessary to clarify or modify the law regarding birthright citizenship. <\/p>\n