{"id":2621282,"date":"2026-06-30T05:25:02","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T09:25:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/amy-coney-barrett-sparks-maga-backlash-over-mail-ballot-ruling\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T05:28:22","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T09:28:22","slug":"amy-coney-barrett-sparks-maga-backlash-over-mail-ballot-ruling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/amy-coney-barrett-sparks-maga-backlash-over-mail-ballot-ruling\/","title":{"rendered":"Amy Coney Barrett sparks MAGA backlash over mail-ballot ruling"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"float:left\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">18<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Famy-coney-barrett-sparks-maga-backlash-over-mail-ballot-ruling%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2621282&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>Justice Amy Coney Barrett of the Supreme Court faced meaningful backlash from President Donald Trump&#8217;s political base after joining a 5-4 ruling that upheld Mississippi law allowing ballots postmarked by election day to be counted if they arrive later. The court rejected the Republican national Committee&#8217;s argument that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/four-major-cases-the-supreme-court-will-hear-in-2026\/\" title=\"Four major cases the Supreme ... will hear in 2026\">federal law requires ballots<\/a> to be received by election day, stating that election laws specify when voters must cast ballots, not when states must receive them. Conservative critics, including Senator eric Schmitt and commentators like Megyn Kelly, expressed disappointment, claiming the decision threatens election integrity by permitting late mail-in ballots. The ruling sparked internal division within the court, with Justice Samuel Alito dissenting sharply, warning it could undermine election security and increase voter fraud risks. Justice barrett defended the decision, emphasizing that voter choice is finalized when voting concludes, not upon ballot receipt, and maintained that public criticism should not influence judicial duties. The decision marks a contentious point in the broader debate over election laws and voting procedures, illustrating the deep political and <a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/3YuVZYV\" >ideological divides surrounding electoral processes<\/a> in the United States.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<article class=\"fn-body\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/supreme-court\/\">Supreme Court<\/a> Justice <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/amy-coney-barrett\/\">Amy Coney Barrett<\/a> is <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/supreme-court\/3341332\/maga-has-a-problem-with-amy-coney-barrett-its-more-complicated-than-they-think\/\">once again<\/a> facing fierce backlash from President <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/donald-trump\/\">Donald Trump<\/a>\u2019s political base after joining Chief Justice John Roberts and the court\u2019s three liberal justices on Monday in a ruling that dealt a setback to Republican efforts to prevent states from counting mail-in ballots that arrive days or weeks after election night.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The 5-4 decision in <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/supreme-court\/4593067\/supreme-court-upholds-law-counting-late-mail-ballots\/\">Watson v. Republican National Committee<\/a><\/em> upheld a <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/mississippi\/\">Mississippi<\/a> law allowing absentee ballots postmarked by election day to be counted if they arrive afterward, rejecting the <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/republican-national-committee\/\">Republican National Committee<\/a>\u2019s argument that federal law requires all ballots to be received by election day.<\/p>\n<section class=\"explore-more-section\" id=\"wex-recommended-widget\">\n<div class=\"magazine-container single\">\n<h1 class=\"magazine-title mt-2\">Recommended Stories<\/h1>\n<p>             <i class=\"fa-solid fa-play icon\"><\/i>         <\/div>\n<div class=\"explore-grid\">\n<div class=\"explore-card\">                         <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/senate\/4629264\/ruben-gallego-campaign-finance-violations-doj-investigation\/?itm_source=parsely-api\">                             <\/p>\n<div class=\"explore-thumb-wrap\">                                                                                                                                  <\/div>\n<h3>Ruben Gallego hit with DOJ investigation for campaign finance violations<\/h3>\n<p>                         <\/a>                     <\/div>\n<div class=\"explore-card\">                         <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/justice\/4629000\/luigi-mangione-federal-trial-january-2027\/?itm_source=parsely-api\">                             <\/p>\n<div class=\"explore-thumb-wrap\">                                                                                                                                  <\/div>\n<h3>Luigi Mangione federal trial pushed back to January<\/h3>\n<p>                         <\/a>                     <\/div>\n<div class=\"explore-card\">                         <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/justice\/4628826\/judge-alex-murdaugh-retrial-date-april-2027\/?itm_source=parsely-api\">                             <\/p>\n<div class=\"explore-thumb-wrap\">                                                                                                                                  <\/div>\n<h3>Judge sets Alex Murdaugh retrial date for April 2027<\/h3>\n<p>                         <\/a>                     <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/section>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\">Supreme Court Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett speaks at the Library of Congress, Thursday, March 12, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo\/Rod Lamkey, Jr.)<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; data-large-file=&#8221;https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/amyconeybarrett.webp?w=696&#8243; &#8220;https:><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Supreme Court Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett speaks at the Library of Congress, Thursday, March 12, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo\/Rod Lamkey, Jr.)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Writing for the majority, Barrett said federal election statutes establish when voters must cast their ballots but \u201csay nothing about ballot receipt.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"wex-inarticle-ad wex-inarticle-ad-art-dsk-inart-1\">\n<div class=\"wex-ad-wrap wex-ad-art-dsk-inart-1\" style=\"min-height:90px\"><span class=\"wex-ad-label\" hidden>Advertisement<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"div-gpt-ad-3182201-15\" data-wex-ad=\"art-dsk-inart-1\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"article-paywall\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe electorate\u2019s choice is made when voting is complete, not when ballots are received,\u201d Barrett wrote. \u201cElection-day statutes say nothing about ballot receipt, and we cannot add to the words Congress chose.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ruling marked a significant defeat for Trump and the RNC, which had argued the decision would have nationwide implications for election administration ahead of the November midterm elections.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Conservatives reacted almost immediately.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wex-inarticle-ad wex-inarticle-ad-art-dsk-inart-2\">\n<div class=\"wex-ad-wrap wex-ad-art-dsk-inart-2\" style=\"min-height:90px\"><span class=\"wex-ad-label\" hidden>Advertisement<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"div-gpt-ad-3182201-16\" data-wex-ad=\"art-dsk-inart-2\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cA shockingly wrong opinion,\u201d Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) wrote on X. \u201cJustice Barrett joins with the liberal justices to hold that federal election law does not preempt states who allow late mail-in ballots to be counted. This is terrible for election integrity. Another reason we must pass the full SAVE American Act.\u201d<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-x wp-block-embed-x\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">A shockingly wrong opinion.<\/p>\n<p>Justice Barrett joins with the liberal justices to hold that federal election law does not preempt states who allow late mail-in ballots to be counted.<\/p>\n<p>This is terrible for election integrity. Another reason we must pass the full SAVE American Act. <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/2G6GvdX4Ub\">pic.twitter.com\/2G6GvdX4Ub<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Senator Eric Schmitt (@SenEricSchmitt) <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/SenEricSchmitt\/status\/2071598452698456132?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 29, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script data-cfasync=\"false\" src=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/cdn-cgi\/scripts\/5c5dd728\/cloudflare-static\/email-decode.min.js\"><\/script><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.x.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script> <\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Political commentator Josh Hammer <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/josh_hammer\/status\/2071598289040859614\">wrote<\/a> that Barrett \u201ccontinues to disappoint in far too many high-profile cases,\u201d while author Hans Mahncke <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/HansMahncke\/status\/2071604016857924041\">called her<\/a> \u201cthe biggest conservative judicial disaster since [former Justice David] Souter.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Rep. Abe Hamadeh\u2019s (R-AZ) congressional office said the ruling \u201cguarantees we\u2019ll keep drifting away\u201d from election day as elections become \u201cbogged down by endless mail-in ballots.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"wex-inarticle-ad wex-inarticle-ad-art-dsk-inart-3\">\n<div class=\"wex-ad-wrap wex-ad-art-dsk-inart-3\" style=\"min-height:90px\"><span class=\"wex-ad-label\" hidden>Advertisement<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"div-gpt-ad-3182201-17\" data-wex-ad=\"art-dsk-inart-3\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Conservative commentator Megyn Kelly posted, \u201cBarrett. AGAIN. WTF.\u201d<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-x wp-block-embed-x\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Barrett. AGAIN. WTF<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/megynkelly\/status\/2071596768194961445?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 29, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.x.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script> <\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project, told the <em>Washington Examiner<\/em> that he found the ruling \u201cdeeply disappointing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cFederal law is clear: all ballots must be received by Election Day to be counted,\u201d Snead said in a statement. \u201cThe Court missed a major opportunity to reinforce election integrity and instead sides with California-style chaos.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"wex-inarticle-ad wex-inarticle-ad-art-dsk-inart-4\">\n<div class=\"wex-ad-wrap wex-ad-art-dsk-inart-4\" style=\"min-height:90px\"><span class=\"wex-ad-label\" hidden>Advertisement<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"div-gpt-ad-3182201-25\" data-wex-ad=\"art-dsk-inart-4\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at Advancing American Freedom, similarly described the ruling as a <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/supreme-court\/4628504\/alito-warns-supreme-courts-late-arrival-ballot-ruling-risks-undermine-confidence-elections\/\">\u201cgrave disappointment,\u201d<\/a> arguing Barrett\u2019s opinion conflicted with the plain text of federal election law and historical practice.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Trump also blasted the ruling on Truth Social, calling it a \u201ctremendous loss\u201d in a Truth Social post while renewing his call for Congress to pass the SAVE Act, legislation that would require documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThere is no excuse for a politician, or otherwise, to be against\u201d requiring voter identification, proof of citizenship, and sharply limiting mail-in voting, Trump wrote. \u201cThere is only one reason to oppose \u2014 CHEATING!\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"wex-inarticle-ad wex-inarticle-ad-art-dsk-inart-5\">\n<div class=\"wex-ad-wrap wex-ad-art-dsk-inart-5\" style=\"min-height:90px\"><span class=\"wex-ad-label\" hidden>Advertisement<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"div-gpt-ad-3182201-26\" data-wex-ad=\"art-dsk-inart-5\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The latest criticism marks another chapter in Barrett\u2019s increasingly strained relationship with portions of the MAGA movement.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Although Barrett has become a frequent target of Trump\u2019s supporters in politically charged cases, she remains one of the Supreme Court\u2019s most consistently conservative justices, having played a central role in landmark decisions overturning <em>Roe v. Wade<\/em>, ending race-conscious college admissions, and expanding Second Amendment rights all in the same 2022 term.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Yet, when she has shown a willingness to part with the same president who appointed her in a handful of high-stakes cases, her conservative record becomes diluted by knee-jerk reactions online.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Last year, Barrett drew sharp criticism after joining Roberts and the court\u2019s liberal justices in declining to block a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/supreme-court-gives-trump-first-win-over-teacher-grants-freeze\/\" title=\"Supreme ... gives Trump first win over teacher grants freeze\">lower court order requiring<\/a> the Trump administration to release nearly $2 billion in foreign aid payments while litigation continued. That was the same term she <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/supreme-court\/3455997\/supreme-court-nationwide-injunctions-trump-birthright-citizenship-case\/\">authored the decision in <em>Trump v. CASA<\/em><\/a>, a major decision favoring the president that curbed excessive nationwide injunctions of the president\u2019s key administrative policies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Conversely, Barrett joined Roberts and fellow Trump appointee Neil Gorsuch in <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/supreme-court\/4409863\/supreme-court-strikes-down-trumps-sweeping-liberation-day-tariffs\/\">striking down Trump\u2019s signature tariff policy<\/a>, another decision that angered many of the president\u2019s supporters.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Monday\u2019s ruling also exposed divisions within the court\u2019s conservative wing.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Justice <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/samuel-alito\/page\/2\/\">Samuel Alito<\/a> authored a forceful dissent joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh, arguing the majority misread federal law and weakened election safeguards.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\">Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito attends a meeting with Mons. Laurence John Spiteri, in Rome, Saturday, Sept. 20, 2025. (AP Photo\/Andrew Medichini)<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; data-large-file=&#8221;https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/\/2026\/06\/localimages\/AP25263594627210-4-1.jpg?w=696&#8243; &#8220;https:><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito attends a meeting with Mons. Laurence John Spiteri, in Rome, Saturday, Sept. 20, 2025. (AP Photo\/Andrew Medichini)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cToday\u2019s decision leaves open opportunities for voter fraud that may further undermine Americans\u2019 faith in the integrity of this country\u2019s elections,\u201d Alito wrote. \u201cIt is undeniable that a prohibition on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/nevada-allowed-to-continue-counting-late-arriving-ballots-judge-rules\/\" title=\"Nevada allowed to continue counting late-arriving ..., judge rules\">counting late-arriving ballots<\/a> would provide an additional hurdle for bad actors seeking to stuff ballot boxes when <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/alito-warns-late-arriving-ballot-ruling-may-undermine-election-confidence\/\" title=\"Alito warns late-arriving ballot ruling may undermine election confidence\">early election results suggest<\/a> a tight race.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/supreme-court\/4593067\/supreme-court-upholds-law-counting-late-mail-ballots\/\">SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS MISSISSIPPI LAW COUNTING LATE-ARRIVING MAIL BALLOTS<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Despite the repeated political backlash, Barrett has consistently maintained that public criticism cannot influence her work on the bench.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cTo do this job, you have to be willing to be unpopular,\u201d Barrett said during a public appearance last fall. \u201cThere\u2019s a little bit of an element of loneliness because you never know who is going to criticize you and who is not. But the job is to tune it out and do the right thing anyway.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/article>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Amy Coney Barrett faces backlash over mail-in ballot ruling<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2633,"featured_media":2621283,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/AP26071749587423.jpg?w=696","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[33651],"tags":[33229,32644,5656,81942,32275],"class_list":["post-2621282","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-western-journal","tag-amy-coney-barrett","tag-election-integrity","tag-maga","tag-mail-ballot-2","tag-supreme-court"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/AP26071749587423.jpg?w=696","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2621282","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2633"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2621282"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2621282\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2621286,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2621282\/revisions\/2621286"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2621283"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2621282"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2621282"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2621282"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}