{"id":2611648,"date":"2026-06-07T10:30:02","date_gmt":"2026-06-07T14:30:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/how-red-and-blue-america-can-stay-together-by-pulling-apart\/"},"modified":"2026-06-07T10:46:50","modified_gmt":"2026-06-07T14:46:50","slug":"how-red-and-blue-america-can-stay-together-by-pulling-apart","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/how-red-and-blue-america-can-stay-together-by-pulling-apart\/","title":{"rendered":"How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"float:left\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">22<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fhow-red-and-blue-america-can-stay-together-by-pulling-apart%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2611648&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>The text argues that America\u2019s political divide is so deep that it may be worth considering a peaceful \u201cAmerican Union\u201d made up of two sovereign nations-one leaning red and one leaning blue-bound together in areas where cooperation is still beneficial. It acknowledges major questions such as how to handle the national debt, military bases, federal lands, nuclear weapons, and Social Security, but claims these issues can be solved through negotiated agreements and shared institutions, drawing on precedents from other countries.<\/p>\n<p>The article explains that large states have advantages of scale, but that globalization has reduced those advantages, making smaller, more politically aligned jurisdictions more feasible. It points to the European Union as a model where separate sovereign governments maintain economic integration and coordinated defence without fully merging politically. It claims an American Union would preserve the current common market (tariff-free trade, free movement of peopel and capital, and ability for citizens to live\/work across the border), while creating only a limited set of shared institutions rather than a new overarching government.<\/p>\n<p>For governance, it proposes an \u201cAmerican Union Council\u201d to supervise the framework and approve common budgets, alongside expert bodies for shared systems-especially a successor to the Federal Reserve for currency policy and a continental defense council. It argues that shared control would be insulated from takeover by either nation\u2019s politics, and that compromises would focus on currency and defense rather than broad social or moral questions.<\/p>\n<p>On defense and nuclear strategy, it suggests keeping a unified architecture for continental defense (and nuclear deterrence, cyber, and space), overseen by a new \u201cAmerican Union Defense Council,\u201d potentially modeled on NORAD. It emphasizes that each nation would retain control over ordinary military decisions, while common defense assets would not be used offensively against each other, and a founding compact would prohibit turning force on the other side.<\/p>\n<p>For money and benefits, the article describes a shared monetary system similar to currency unions, while fiscal policy remains separate. It argues for continuity of obligations, including protections for Social Security through allocation formulas and portability measures.It also discusses dividing or jointly managing assets such as federal land, energy infrastructure, and certain strategic resources, using negotiated rules and safeguards.<\/p>\n<p>it says disputes would be handled through a combination of union-level bodies and binding arbitration, and that implementing the plan would take years-unlike Brexit, where separation terms came after a referendum. The piece concludes that this \u201cthird path\u201d would sit between full national unity and total separation: union where it helps, autonomy where it heals.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><br \/>\n<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\"><br \/>\n<?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><html><body><\/p>\n<section> \t\t\t\t<script>console.log(\"ad slot (AC1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC2)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC3)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC4)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_0)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_2)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_3)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_4)\")<\/script><\/p>\n<p>In earlier essays, I argued that America\u2019s political division has grown so deep that a peaceful \u201cAmerican Union\u201d of two sovereign nations \u2014 one broadly red, one broadly blue \u2014 is worth considering. I also argued that relocation fears are overstated, that cooperation could increase economic prosperity, and that separation could help heal the lingering wounds of the Civil War.<\/p>\n<p>But how would this all actually work? What happens to the national debt? Who gets the military bases, federal lands, and nuclear weapons? Will Social Security be protected? Could two nations  the dollar, defend themselves together, and resolve their disagreements?<\/p>\n<p>These are serious concerns, but they can be addressed. Other countries have already built the tools an American Union would need: common markets, d currencies, defense pacts, financial settlements, and negotiated asset division.<\/p>\n<p>This is not a finished blueprint \u2014 specialists would need years to settle the formulas and mechanics \u2014 but it offers evidence that a workable approach exists.<\/p>\n<p>If red and blue America are so divided, some will ask, why do we think they would cooperate within a joint central bank, defense council, or strategic command? The answer is that d institutions would focus on the interests both would still have every reason to protect, and on which Americans have long broadly agreed \u2014 namely security, a stable currency, and an integrated market \u2014 not the areas of stark social division that set the two apart.<\/p>\n<p>Political economists Alberto Alesina and Enrico Spolaore describe a tradeoff between large and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/what-conservatism-must-conserve\/\" title=\"What Conservatism Must Conserve\">small states<\/a>. Large countries gain from scale \u2014 bigger markets, stronger militaries, costs spread across more people. Smaller ones often govern closer to citizens\u2019 preferences; when a population disagrees sharply, the cost of staying in one state rises.<\/p>\n<p>Globalization has eroded the advantages of size: as trade expands, <a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/3YuVZYV\" >small countries reach large markets<\/a> without sharing a government.<\/p>\n<p>The result is more political jurisdictions with deeper economic integration. In 1945, the United Nations had 51 member states; today it has 193, even as global trade has expanded. Fragmentation and integration often advance together \u2014 making an American Union less an anomaly than a continuation of a global pattern.<\/p>\n<p>The clearest modern example is the European Union. Its members remain sovereign \u2014 their own governments, taxes, languages, and social programs \u2014 yet  a common market with free movement of goods, capital, services, and people; many  the euro; and many of the same countries cooperate militarily through NATO.<\/p>\n<p>Though not flawless, the E.U. demonstrates that sovereign states can integrate economically and militarily without merging politically.<\/p>\n<p>An American Union would begin from a far stronger foundation. Europe had to integrate nations with 24 different official languages, legal and cultural traditions, and histories of armed conflict. The United States already s a language, a currency, an integrated market, common citizenship, military institutions, and two centuries of civic identity. The A.U. would not be creating integration after a long separation, but preserving one that exists \u2014 while giving red and blue America greater self-government.<\/p>\n<p>The American Union would keep the existing U.S. common market intact. Trade would stay tariff-free, businesses would operate across the border as across state lines, and goods, capital, and labor would move freely. As in the E.U., citizens of both nations could live and work anywhere within the A.U. \u2014 essential to keeping the d market, and the people in it, free.<\/p>\n<p>To manage those interests, an American Union would need a limited set of common institutions, not a new national government.<\/p>\n<p>An \u201cAmerican Union Council,\u201d with representatives from both nations, would supervise the framework and approve common budgets. Each function would have its own expert body \u2014 a Federal Reserve successor for the dollar, a continental defense council, and joint commissions for other cross-border systems.<\/p>\n<p>d rules mean each nation will sometimes abide by decisions it would not have made alone. But, as a practical matter, this is already something Americans endure. Texas and California today both live under one monetary policy and one defense posture neither controls \u2014 a compromise that often fully satisfies neither but that both can tolerate.<\/p>\n<p>The difference is that such compromise would be confined to the dollar and common defense, not extended to every social and moral question.<\/p>\n<p>Importantly and beneficially, d control insulates these decisions from any single nation\u2019s politics. A central bank and continental defense structure answerable to two governments are far harder for one president or party to capture. Recent controversies over presidential pressure on the Federal Reserve and unilateral military action show why institutional checks matter. In an American Union, neither management of the dollar nor d strategic force would rest with one nation\u2019s executive.<\/p>\n<p>The United States today maintains one of the world\u2019s most integrated military and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-chance-of-nuclear-war-isnt-increasing\/\" title=\"The Chance of Nuclear War Isn\u2019t Increasing\">nuclear command structures<\/a>, and an American Union would preserve the parts necessary for continental defense \u2014 though not every asset or decision would be d.<\/p>\n<p>Here the A.U. would preserve an architecture built over generations, overseen by a new \u201cAmerican Union Defense Council\u201d of civilian leaders from both governments, with a unified professional command for continental defense, nuclear deterrence, cyber and space operations, and alliances.<\/p>\n<p>A longstanding model for continental defense is the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) \u2014 the defense alliance between the United States and Canada \u2014 that could be updated to include red America and blue America along with Canada.<\/p>\n<p>NORAD already shows that sovereign countries can cooperate through a binational command for North American defense while each remains subject to its own laws, policies, and directives. The updated NORAD model would continue to operate under pre-approved rules of engagement, including ones that allow rapid response when minutes matter.<\/p>\n<p>Each nation would keep its own forces and sovereign authority over ordinary military decisions \u2014 a rescue mission, peacekeeping deployment, or limited overseas operation \u2014 while North American defense would proceed under jointly approved standing rules, as NORAD does today.<\/p>\n<p>What neither could do is use d AU assets \u2014 nuclear weapons, joint intelligence, missile defense, continental command \u2014 for offensive action, or trigger common defense obligations, without the procedures the founding compact would set. Above all, that compact would bar the two new republics from turning force on each other \u2014 the entire premise of a new peaceful union.<\/p>\n<p>Both nations would also keep using the dollar through a d monetary authority, just as the eurozone and other currency unions do.<\/p>\n<p>An American Reserve System would carry forward the Federal Reserve\u2019s core functions \u2014 monetary policy, lender of last resort, bank supervision, and inflation control \u2014 with the regional Reserve Banks reorganized into districts serving both nations and an American Open Market Committee like today\u2019s FOMC. Fiscal policy would <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/i-want-to-point-them-to-jesus-nhl-star-mike-fisher-talks-parenthood-politics-and-life-after-hockey\/\" title=\"\u2018I Want To Point Them To Jesus\u2019: NHL Star Mike Fisher Talks Parenthood, Politics And Life After Hockey\">stay separate<\/a>, each nation setting its own taxes and budgets, but both would accept common rules to protect the currency: transparent debt reporting, coordinated supervision, and crisis procedures.<\/p>\n<p>Another requirement would be dividing assets, debts, and institutions \u2014 and history again offers pertinent guidance. The peaceful 1993 dissolution of Czechoslovakia into the Czech Republic and Slovakia \u2014 the so-called \u201cVelvet Divorce\u201d \u2014 showed that a complicated modern federal state can divide sovereignty, property, and debt by negotiation, using formulas that often tracked population.<\/p>\n<p>And while significantly smaller than that of America, at the time of separation the Czechoslovakian economy was still roughly that of a mid-sized U.S. state.<\/p>\n<p>More recently, Britain\u2019s withdrawal from the E.U. disentangled a multi-trillion-dollar economy \u2014 one of the world\u2019s largest \u2014 from a deeply integrated system, yielding pertinent lessons on financial obligations, citizens\u2019 rights, and regulatory continuity as well as a negotiated settlement of many outstanding obligations. An American Union would need similar formulas: federal debt apportioned by population, GDP, tax base, or some blend, with the same logic governing pensions, veterans\u2019 benefits, and other earned commitments.<\/p>\n<p>For most Americans a key question is whether the checks will keep coming. They would. The governing principle would be continuity \u2014 obligations to current beneficiaries honored without interruption, whichever nation a retiree lives in.<\/p>\n<p>Trust funds for programs like Social Security \u2014 like other federal assets \u2014 would be allocated by an agreed formula reflecting contributions and beneficiary populations. Portability would be assured, as no worker should lose decades of credit by retiring across the line, and so-called \u201ctotalization agreements\u201d \u2014 which already let people combine contributions from different countries \u2014 offer a template.<\/p>\n<p>Going forward, each nation would design its own <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/biden-white-house-confirms-3t-infrastructure-bill-will-be-in-two-parts\/\" title=\"Biden White House confirms T infrastructure bill will be in two parts\">social welfare programs<\/a>; what it could not do is repudiate what was already promised.<\/p>\n<p>Federal land would generally be apportioned to the nation in which it sits, while some assets would need special handling: mineral and water rights, leases, royalties, and tribal rights preserved, and strategic resources like uranium and rare earths governed by supply guarantees and national security agreements.<\/p>\n<p>Energy infrastructure would require joint management, building on rules that already govern cross-border flows of power, oil, and gas.<\/p>\n<p>The United States and Canada already maintain a deeply interconnected energy system of cross-border pipelines and power lines, and the Nordic and Baltic states through Nord Pool as well as the six Central American nations linked by the SIEPAC grid provide other useful examples.<\/p>\n<p>Ordinary military bases and ranges would pass to the host nation under d use arrangements, while strategic assets stay within the common framework. Precedent is instructive: When the Soviet Union dissolved, the new states did not simply divide the nuclear arsenal among themselves. They consolidated control under a single successor framework, with international assurances in exchange. An American Union would face the same logic: nuclear control kept unified, not divided by map or party.<\/p>\n<p>An American Union would, of course, need a neutral way to resolve inevitable disagreements, and the models are well established: the E.U.-U.K. Withdrawal Agreement routes disputes through a Joint Committee and then an independent arbitration panel; the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) uses arbitral panels; and the Permanent Court of Arbitration has served to help resolve inter-country disputes since 1899.<\/p>\n<p>While most disagreements would be settled by the American Union Council \u2014 whose purpose would be to defuse friction before it hardens \u2014 the rest would go to a standing arbitration panel, with members each nation names in advance, plus a neutral chair from a pre-agreed roster, so no dispute lingers. Its rulings would bind both governments, with the founding agreement setting consequences for noncompliance, as trade agreements do.<\/p>\n<p>None of this would happen overnight. It would unfold over many years \u2014 likely a decade or more \u2014 beginning with study and negotiation, then a commission to inventory assets, liabilities, and programs, and finally a comprehensive agreement covering the common market, currency, defense, benefits, and assets. All the while, existing structures would stay in place as successor institutions gradually take over.<\/p>\n<p>Unlike Brexit, where a binding referendum came first and the terms of separation were settled afterward, against a ticking clock \u2014 an American Union would fix the terms in detail before any irreversible step, so citizens would know what separation meant before committing to it.<\/p>\n<p>Step back from the mechanics, and what emerges is a new form of governance without a familiar name. The American Union would be neither the full political integration the country has today \u2014 one sovereign government over all \u2014 nor a clean break of two unrelated nations going entirely their own ways. It would sit deliberately between them: sovereign republics that stay bound where union still serves them and that govern separately where d rule has only deepened social conflict.<\/p>\n<p>Most arguments about America\u2019s future assume a binary: hold together as we are or break apart for good. The American Union is a third path between them \u2014 union where union helps and autonomy where it heals.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><i><b>The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either d or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/submitop-ed\/\">here<\/a>.<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n<div style=\"background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #171717; display: flex;font-size: 16px;font-weight: 600;line-height: 1.5;margin: 24px 0;padding: 18px 20px 18px 30px;text-align: left;\">\n<div style=\"align-self: stretch;border-left: 3px solid #171717;flex-shrink: 0;padding-left: 20px;\"><\/div>\n<p><a style=\"text-decoration: none;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/preferences\/source?q=https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/\">Choose The Western Journal as your preferred source on Google and never miss reporting that defends truth, protects freedom, and advances Western civilization<\/a><\/div>\n<p style=\"border: 1px solid #f5f5f5; padding: 16px;\">Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/advertise-us\/?wj_source=article\">Advertise Today<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div class=\"entry-submit-correction inner-content\">\n<div class=\"correction-form\">\n<form style=\"display: none;\">\n<div class=\"sc-name-field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* Name<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"name\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<div class=\"sc--field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* <\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<label>* Message<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t<textarea name=\"message\" required><\/textarea> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"required-message\" style=\"display: none; padding-bottom: 15px;\">* All fields are required.<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"submit\" value=\"Submit\" onclick=\"event.preventDefault(); firefly_sc();\"> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"firefly-sc-confirm\" style=\"display: none;\">Success!<\/div>\n<\/p><\/form>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p> \t\t<script> \t\t\tfunction firefly_sc() { \t\t\t\tif( typeof window.captchaPublicKey == typeof undefined ){ \t\t\t\t\tconsole.error('window.captchaPublicKey is not defined'); \t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\tgrecaptcha.execute( window.captchaPublicKey, { action: 'submit_correction' } ).then( function( token ) { \t\t\t\t\tvar opts = { \t\t\t\t\t\taction:    'firefly_sc_submit', \t\t\t\t\t\tname:      document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"name\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\t:     document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tmessage:   document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"message\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tpost_id:   firefly_post_id, \t\t\t\t\t\tcap_token: token \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tvar inputs = [ 'name', '', 'message' ];  \t\t\t\t\tfor( var i = 0; i < inputs.length; i++ ) if( ! ( opts[inputs[i]] = document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"' + inputs[i] + '\"]' ).value ) ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .required-message' ).style.display = 'block'; \t\t\t\t\t\treturn; \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction input[type=\"submit\"]' ).style.display = 'none'; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).src = firefly_loading_gif_url; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display = 'inline-block';  \t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( 'ma subbing' );  \t\t\t\t\tif( firefly_post_id ) opts['post_id'] = firefly_post_id;  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Send the data using post with element id name and name2*\/ \t\t\t\t\tvar posting = jQuery.post( firefly_ajax_url, opts );  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Alerts the results *\/ \t\t\t\t\tposting.done( function( response ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tif( response.success ) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( response.data ); \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display = 'none'; \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-confirm' ).style.display = 'block';  \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdataLayer.push( { 'event': 'submit-correction' } ); \t\t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t} \t\t<\/script> \t<\/p>\n<div style=\"position: relative;\">\n<div class=\"ff-fancy-header-container\"> \t\t\t \t<\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-submit-correction inner-content\">\n<div class=\"correction-form\">\n<form style=\"display: none;\">\n<div class=\"sc-name-field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* Name<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"name\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<div class=\"sc--field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* <\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<label>* Message<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t<textarea name=\"message\" required><\/textarea> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"required-message\" style=\"display: none; padding-bottom: 15px;\">* All fields are required.<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"submit\" value=\"Submit\" onclick=\"event.preventDefault(); firefly_sc();\"> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"firefly-sc-confirm\" style=\"display: none;\">Success!<\/div>\n<\/p><\/form>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p> \t\t<script> \t\t\tfunction firefly_sc() { \t\t\t\tif( typeof window.captchaPublicKey == typeof undefined ){ \t\t\t\t\tconsole.error('window.captchaPublicKey is not defined'); \t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\tgrecaptcha.execute( window.captchaPublicKey, { action: 'submit_correction' } ).then( function( token ) { \t\t\t\t\tvar opts = { \t\t\t\t\t\taction:    'firefly_sc_submit', \t\t\t\t\t\tname:      document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"name\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\t:     document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tmessage:   document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"message\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tpost_id:   firefly_post_id, \t\t\t\t\t\tcap_token: token \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tvar inputs = [ 'name', '', 'message' ];  \t\t\t\t\tfor( var i = 0; i < inputs.length; i++ ) if( ! ( opts[inputs[i]] = document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"' + inputs[i] + '\"]' ).value ) ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .required-message' ).style.display = 'block'; \t\t\t\t\t\treturn; \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction input[type=\"submit\"]' ).style.display = 'none'; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).src = firefly_loading_gif_url; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display = 'inline-block';  \t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( 'ma subbing' );  \t\t\t\t\tif( firefly_post_id ) opts['post_id'] = firefly_post_id;  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Send the data using post with element id name and name2*\/ \t\t\t\t\tvar posting = jQuery.post( firefly_ajax_url, opts );  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Alerts the results *\/ \t\t\t\t\tposting.done( function( response ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tif( response.success ) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( response.data ); \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display = 'none'; \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-confirm' ).style.display = 'block';  \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdataLayer.push( { 'event': 'submit-correction' } ); \t\t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t} \t\t<\/script> \t     \t\t\t\t\t\t     \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t<script>console.log(\"ad slot (BA1)\")<\/script> \t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"ff-fancy-header-container\"> \t\t\t \t<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<p><\/body><\/html><\/p>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I previously argued America is divided enough to consider a peaceful \u201cAmerican Union\u201d of two sovereign nations<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2611649,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Untitled-design-2026-06-05T233442.683.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[33567,63464,40565,80967],"class_list":["post-2611648","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-american-politics","tag-polarization","tag-political-reform","tag-unity-vs-division"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Untitled-design-2026-06-05T233442.683.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2611648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2611648"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2611648\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2611658,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2611648\/revisions\/2611658"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2611649"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2611648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2611648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2611648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}