<\/div><\/aside>\n

the article describes a new controversy involving Virginia Attorney general Jay jones\u2019 office during an emergency appeal related to a state court redistricting ruling. It says Democrats had their voter\/district map decision challenged and then appealed to delay the state Supreme Court\u2019s mandate, planning to take the matter to the U.S.Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

However, the piece claims that even though the petition was run through spell check, the office forgot to fully update a template. As an inevitable result, the document allegedly still refers to an \u201cemergency request to the Supreme Court of Virginia,\u201d wich the author presents as an improper\/incorrect labeling for a filing intended for the U.S. Supreme court. The article also notes that the Supreme Court issue is treated as a state matter, and criticizes the filing as rushed, pointing out that other context and paperwork appear inconsistent as well. It further includes commentary and examples from social media posts highlighting<\/a> the same alleged template mistake. <\/p>\n