<\/div><\/aside>\n

A Virginia redistricting referendum held on April 21 passed with about 51.7% in favor, which opponents argued would shift congressional districts toward Democrats. though, Republicans challenged the referendum\u2019s constitutionality, and on April 22 a Tazewell County judge issued an injunction stating that votes on the amendment were ineffective as the referendum was void \u201cab initio\u201d (from the beginning), preventing the state Board of Elections from certifying the results.<\/p>\n

on Tuesday, the Virginia Supreme Court denied Democrats\u2019 emergency request to pause the injunction. Commentators-citing former Republican Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli and legal analysis-say the court\u2019s action suggests skepticism about upholding the referendum, though it is not yet a decision on the merits. Justice questions during oral arguments reportedly also focused on whether the \u201cyes\u201d vote matters legally, and on alleged procedural and constitutional problems, including concerns about how the amendment was introduced and approved, required timing, and whether the proposed districts meet constitutional standards<\/a> for contiguity and compactness. <\/p>\n