<\/div><\/aside>\n

The passage argues that Minnesota\u2019s welfare system was designed to speed up enrollment and reduce scrutiny, which the author claims made fraud and erroneous payments more likely. It says that as 2018, high-risk Medicaid programs in Minnesota have cost taxpayers over $18 billion and that a large share of spending might potentially be fraudulent. The article then claims \u201cOne Door\u201d (or \u201cNo Wrong Door\u201d) welfare enrollment policies-using an integrated system to enroll people in multiple programs through one process-should be rejected, arguing they create a \u201cone-way street\u201d to increased fraud by making it easier to qualify for more benefits at once.<\/p>\n

It also alleges that Minnesota worked with outside organizations to implement these changes, including efforts to waive work requirements and to build a system that can enroll people in multiple programs quickly. The author credits Trump and the \u201cwar on Fraud\u201d agenda with pushing anti-fraud enforcement and charges against alleged fraudsters, while warning that expanding integrated eligibility in other states could replicate Minnesota\u2019s problems. it links the issue to proposed or enacted welfare reforms, such as work requirements and penalties for states with high error rates<\/a> in food stamps and Medicaid, warning that adopting \u201cOne Door\u201d would worsen exposure to those penalties. <\/p>\n