{"id":2537803,"date":"2026-01-15T11:34:19","date_gmt":"2026-01-15T16:34:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/watch-josh-hawleys-simple-pregnancy-question-traps-dems-expert-witness-so-thoroughly-that-shes-reduced-to-a-repeating-looping-mess-and-shes-a-medical-doctor-7\/"},"modified":"2026-01-15T11:35:36","modified_gmt":"2026-01-15T16:35:36","slug":"watch-josh-hawleys-simple-pregnancy-question-traps-dems-expert-witness-so-thoroughly-that-shes-reduced-to-a-repeating-looping-mess-and-shes-a-medical-doctor-7","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/watch-josh-hawleys-simple-pregnancy-question-traps-dems-expert-witness-so-thoroughly-that-shes-reduced-to-a-repeating-looping-mess-and-shes-a-medical-doctor-7\/","title":{"rendered":"Watch: Josh Hawley&#8217;s Simple Pregnancy Question Traps Dems&#8217; Expert Witness So Thoroughly That She&#8217;s Reduced to a Repeating, Looping Mess&#8230; and She&#8217;s a Medical Doctor"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"float:left\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">50<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fwatch-josh-hawleys-simple-pregnancy-question-traps-dems-expert-witness-so-thoroughly-that-shes-reduced-to-a-repeating-looping-mess-and-shes-a-medical-doctor-7%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2537803&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>The article describes a viral congressional exchange in which Dr. Nisha Verma, an obstetrician-gynecologist and emory adjunct, was questioned at a Senate hearing about the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/there-are-always-going-to-be-ways-activists-reportedly-plan-to-defy-pro-life-laws-if-roe-is-overturned\/\" title=\"\u2018There Are Always Going To Be Ways\u2019: Activists Reportedly Plan To Defy Pro...Life Laws If Roe Is Overturned\">abortion drug mifepristone<\/a>.When Sen. Josh Hawley asked a direct yes-or-no question-whether men can get pregnant-Verma declined to answer simply, saying people have many identities and calling yes-no questions a &#8220;political tool.&#8221; the author compares Verma&#8217;s response to Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson&#8217;s earlier &#8220;I&#8217;m not a biologist&#8221; moment, frames Verma&#8217;s testimony as evasive and embarrassing, and argues it undermines the credibility of &#8220;science&#8221; advocates. Hawley pressed that the question was about biological reality and the safety of women; the piece portrays his follow-up as a strong rebuttal. the article is an opinion critique that paints Verma&#8217;s answers as avoidant, accuses her of failing to represent medical science, and suggests the episode damaged trust in scientific authorities.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<p><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><\/p>\n<section> \t\t\t\t<script>console.log(\"ad slot (AC1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC2)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC3)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC4)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_0)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_2)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_3)\")<\/script><\/p>\n<p>If you&rsquo;re given almost four years to come up with an acceptable answer to a question that should be obvious, you&rsquo;d think you&rsquo;d maybe do a bit better than Dr. Nisha Verma did on Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p>To understand how fatuous and avoidable Verma&rsquo;s viral moment of infamy is, we have to backtrack to March of 2022. That&rsquo;s when Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson was appearing in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee as part of her confirmation hearings to the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p>She was asked to provide a definition of what a woman was. Simple, no?<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;I&rsquo;m not a biologist,&rdquo; was the best that Jackson could manage.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">SEN. BLACKBURN: &ldquo;Can you provide a definition of the word &lsquo;woman&rsquo;?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>JACKSON: &ldquo;No, I can&rsquo;t&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>BLACKBURN: &ldquo;You can&rsquo;t?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>JACKSON: &ldquo;I&rsquo;m not a biologist&rdquo; <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/i7Rg83z5Y4\">pic.twitter.com\/i7Rg83z5Y4<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/RNCResearch\/status\/1506451123674173443?\">March 23, 2022<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p> <script type=\"text\/javascript\"> \t\t\tif ( getCookie( \"ff_subbed\" ) ) { \t\t\t\tdocument.getElementById(\"stnvideo\").remove() \t\t\t} else { \t\t\t\tdocument.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\", function() { \t\t\t\t\tfunction loadScript(src) { \t\t\t\t\t\tconst script=document.createElement(\"script\"); \t\t\t\t\t\tscript.src=src; \t\t\t\t\t\tscript.async=true; \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.body.appendChild(script); \t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\tfunction findPreviousParagraph(selector, x) { \t\t\t\t\t\tconst targetElement=document.querySelector(selector); \t\t\t\t\t\tif (!targetElement) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.warn(\"Target element not found.\"); \t\t\t\t\t\t\treturn null; \t\t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Get all <\/p>\n<p> elements in order as they appear in the document \t\t\t\t\t\tlet paragraphs=Array.from(document.querySelectorAll(\"p\"));  \t\t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Find the index of the last <\/p>\n<p> before the target element \t\t\t\t\t\tlet targetIndex=paragraphs.findIndex(p=> p.compareDocumentPosition(targetElement) & Node.DOCUMENT_POSITION_PRECEDING);  \t\t\t\t\t\tif (targetIndex===-1 || targetIndex <x) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.warn(\"Not enough paragraphs before the target element.\"); \t\t\t\t\t\t\treturn null; \t\t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\treturn paragraphs[targetIndex - x]; \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Set up IntersectionObserver \t\t\t\t\tfunction observeElement(element) { \t\t\t\t\t\tif (!element) return;  \t\t\t\t\t\tconst observer=new IntersectionObserver( \t\t\t\t\t\t\t(entries)=> { \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tentries.forEach(entry=> { \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tif (entry.isIntersecting) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.log(\"Paragraph is now visible:\", entry.target.textContent.trim()); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tloadScript(\"https:\/\/embed.sendtonews.com\/player3\/embedcode.js?fk=s28Az7AY\"); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tobserver.disconnect(); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t}, \t\t\t\t\t\t\t{ threshold: 0.5 } \/\/ Adjust threshold as needed \t\t\t\t\t\t);  \t\t\t\t\t\tobserver.observe(element); \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Find the 1st paragraph before #stnvideo and observe it \t\t\t\t\tlet paragraphToObserve=findPreviousParagraph(\"#stnvideo\", 2); \t\t\t\t\tobserveElement(paragraphToObserve); \t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t} \t\t<\/script> <\/p>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>That clip has taken on a whole lore of its own, particularly as Justice Jackson <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/ketanji-brown-jackson-humiliates-frustrated-attorney-forced-teach-simple-legal-term-front-entire-court\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">makes a fool of herself<\/a> on the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/watch-josh-hawleys-simple-pregnancy-question-traps-dems-expert-witness-so-thoroughly-that-shes-reduced-to-a-repeating-looping-mess-and-shes-a-medical-doctor\/\" title=\"Watch: ...&#039;s Simple Pregnancy Question Traps Dems&#039; Expert Witness So Thoroughly That She&#039;s Reduced to a Repeating, Looping Mess... and She&#039;s a Medical Doctor\">biggest transgender case<\/a> before the court this session, regarding whether individual states can ban boys from playing in girls&rsquo; school sports. But that&rsquo;s taking place on a different part of Capitol Hill this week.<\/p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Verma appeared before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to testify about the safety of the abortion drug mifepristone. Verma was a witness called by Democrats.<\/p>\n<p>An obstetrician-gynecologist in Atlanta, according to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newsweek.com\/doctors-response-to-whether-men-can-get-pregnant-goes-viral-11362478\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Newsweek<\/a>, she is also an <a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/3YuVZYV\" >adjunct assistant professor<\/a> at the Emory Clinic School of Medicine in Atlanta. On paper, at least, it seems like she would be familiar with the physical reality of the female body.<\/p>\n<p>But when it comes to politics, clearly it&rsquo;s a different story.<\/p>\n<p>During the hearing, Missouri GOP Sen. Josh Hawley asked Verma if <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/bbc-finds-star-anchor-showed-bias-correctly-pointing-pregnant-people-women-report\/\">men can get pregnant<\/a>. Verma said she didn&rsquo;t know why he was asking the question.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;The goal is just to establish a biological reality,&rdquo; Hawley said. &ldquo;You just said a moment ago that science and evidence should control, not politics. So, let&rsquo;s just test that proposition: Can men get pregnant?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>What ensued would be funny, were it not so serious.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;I think there are people of many identities,&rdquo; Verma responded.<\/p>\n<p>Yes, but: &ldquo;Can men get pregnant?&rdquo; Hawley asked.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;I take care of many women that can get pregnant. I do take care of people that don&rsquo;t identify as women,&rdquo; she said.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;Let me just remind you, you testified a moment ago: Science and evidence should control, not politics,&rdquo; Hawley said. &ldquo;Do science and evidence tell us that men can get pregnant? Biological men &mdash; can they get pregnant?<\/p>\n<p>Verma, with a pause: &ldquo;I also think yes-no questions like this are a political tool.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>A political tool? In a congressional hearing? Who would have heard of such a thing? And evading a yes or no answer is also clearly <em>not<\/em> a political tool. (I&rsquo;ll give you a minute to wipe off the sarcasm that&rsquo;s dripping from that sentence.)<\/p>\n<p>Anyhow, now was time for the Perry Mason moment that Sen. Hawley had richly earned himself.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;No, yes-no questions are about the truth, doctor,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;Let&rsquo;s not make a mockery of this proceeding. This is about science and evidence. I&rsquo;m asking you: The United States Supreme Court just heard arguments yesterday at great length on this question. This is not a hypothetical question, this is not theoretical. It affects real people in their real lives, and you&rsquo;re here as an expert called by the other side as an expert &hellip;<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;So, I just want to know, based on the science: Can men get pregnant? That&rsquo;s a yes-or-no question. It really is, I think.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>Verma&rsquo;s response: &ldquo;I think you&rsquo;re trying to reduce the complexity of a life.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>This idiocy earned Hawley a second Perry Mason moment:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">&#128680; HOLY CRAP. This actually just happened on Capitol Hill.<\/p>\n<p>SEN. JOSH HAWLEY: &ldquo;Can men get pregnant?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>LIBERAL DR. VERMA: &ldquo;I&rsquo;m not sure what the goal of the question is.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>HAWLEY: &ldquo;The goal is to establish a biological reality. Can men get pregnant?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>VERMA: &ldquo;I take care of&hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/uzYjGJuZmH\">pic.twitter.com\/uzYjGJuZmH<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/EricLDaugh\/status\/2011485172768632969?\">January 14, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;I think it is extraordinary that we are here in a hearing about science and about women &mdash; and, for the record, it&rsquo;s women who get pregnant, not men,&rdquo; he said.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;We are here about the safety of women, and science that shows this abortion drug causes adverse health events in 11 percent of cases &mdash; that&rsquo;s 22 times greater than the FDA label, another fact you haven&rsquo;t acknowledged &mdash; and you won&rsquo;t even acknowledge the basic reality that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/watch-josh-hawleys-simple-pregnancy-question-traps-dems-expert-witness-so-thoroughly-that-shes-reduced-to-a-repeating-looping-mess-and-shes-a-medical-doctor-2\/\" title=\"Watch: ...&#039;s Simple Pregnancy Question Traps Dems&#039; Expert Witness So Thoroughly That She&#039;s Reduced to a Repeating, Looping Mess... and She&#039;s a Medical Doctor\">biological men don&#038;rsquo<\/a>;t get pregnant.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;There is a difference between biological men and biological women. I just don&rsquo;t know how we can take you seriously, and your claims to be a person of science, if you won&rsquo;t level with us on this basic issue. I thought we were past all of this, frankly. I can&rsquo;t believe we are still here talking about this.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>What I can&rsquo;t believe is that, given almost four years, Verma came before Congress with a &ldquo;dog ate my homework&rdquo; answer to the obvious question of what a woman is and whether they&rsquo;re the ones that can get pregnant.<\/p>\n<p>I mean, I know her position would be a lie and an insult to science, but she could have at least <em>tried<\/em>. Put in some effort if you&rsquo;re going to dissemble about whether you can pick your gender and then declaim that you represent science and medicine.<\/p>\n<p>And yes, Sen. Hawley was right: I thought we were all past this. But Verma put herself out there as an emissary of The Science&trade;, then took the simplest yes-no question that can be posed and insisted it wasn&rsquo;t really binary, even though it was. It turned her into a looping mess.<\/p>\n<p>If this is the best The Science&trade; has to offer us, no wonder &ldquo;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/trust-science-americas-oldest-prestigious-science-magazine-goes-full-woke-basic-biology\/\">trust the science<\/a>&rdquo; has become a punchline more than a mantra. We now have medical doctors who can&rsquo;t answer questions that 7-year-olds could answer 10 years ago.<\/p>\n<p>If there was ever summary evidence that a doctor&rsquo;s license should be revoked given during public testimony outside a court of law, this was it.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position: relative;\">\n<div class=\"ff-fancy-header-container\"> \t\t\t \t<\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-submit-correction inner-content\">\n<div class=\"correction-form\">\n<form style=\"display: none;\">\n<div class=\"sc-name-field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* Name<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"name\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<div class=\"sc--field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* <\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<label>* Message<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t<textarea name=\"message\" required><\/textarea> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"required-message\" style=\"display: none; padding-bottom: 15px;\">* All fields are required.<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"submit\" value=\"Submit\" onclick=\"event.preventDefault(); firefly_sc();\"> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"firefly-sc-confirm\" style=\"display: none;\">Success!<\/div>\n<\/p><\/form>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p> \t\t<script> \t\t\tfunction firefly_sc() { \t\t\t\tif( typeof window.captchaPublicKey==typeof undefined ){ \t\t\t\t\tconsole.error('window.captchaPublicKey is not defined'); \t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\tgrecaptcha.execute( window.captchaPublicKey, { action: 'submit_correction' } ).then( function( token ) { \t\t\t\t\tvar opts={ \t\t\t\t\t\taction:    'firefly_sc_submit', \t\t\t\t\t\tname:      document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"name\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\t:     document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tmessage:   document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"message\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tpost_id:   firefly_post_id, \t\t\t\t\t\tcap_token: token \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tvar inputs=[ 'name', '', 'message' ];  \t\t\t\t\tfor( var i=0; i <inputs.length; i++ ) if( ! ( opts[inputs[i]]=document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"' + inputs[i] + '\"]' ).value ) ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .required-message' ).style.display='block'; \t\t\t\t\t\treturn; \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction input[type=\"submit\"]' ).style.display='none'; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).src=firefly_loading_gif_url; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display='inline-block';  \t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( 'ma subbing' );  \t\t\t\t\tif( firefly_post_id ) opts['post_id']=firefly_post_id;  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Send the data using post with element id name and name2*\/ \t\t\t\t\tvar posting=jQuery.post( firefly_ajax_url, opts );  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Alerts the results *\/ \t\t\t\t\tposting.done( function( response ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tif( response.success ) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( response.data ); \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display='none'; \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-confirm' ).style.display='block';  \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdataLayer.push( { 'event': 'submit-correction' } ); \t\t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t} \t\t<\/script> \t     \t\t\t\t\t\t     \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p style=\"border: 1px solid #f5f5f5; padding: 16px;\">Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/advertise-us\/?wj_source=article\">Advertise Today<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><script>console.log(\"ad slot (BA1)\")<\/script> \t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"ff-fancy-header-container\"> \t\t\t \t<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Given years, Verma still dodged an easy question<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2537804,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/nisha-verma-for-jan.-15-2026.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[33651],"tags":[59889,34799,71003,71002,48508],"class_list":["post-2537803","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-western-journal","tag-expert-witness","tag-josh-hawley","tag-medical-doctor","tag-pregnancy-question","tag-senate-hearing"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/nisha-verma-for-jan.-15-2026.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2537803","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2537803"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2537803\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2537807,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2537803\/revisions\/2537807"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2537804"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2537803"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2537803"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2537803"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}