{"id":2518938,"date":"2025-12-08T19:26:01","date_gmt":"2025-12-09T00:26:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/supreme-court-appears-likely-to-issue-historic-ruling-in-favor-of-trump-in-ftc-commissioner-case\/"},"modified":"2025-12-08T19:28:38","modified_gmt":"2025-12-09T00:28:38","slug":"supreme-court-appears-likely-to-issue-historic-ruling-in-favor-of-trump-in-ftc-commissioner-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/supreme-court-appears-likely-to-issue-historic-ruling-in-favor-of-trump-in-ftc-commissioner-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Appears Likely to Issue Historic Ruling in Favor of Trump in FTC Commissioner Case"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"float:left\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">32<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fsupreme-court-appears-likely-to-issue-historic-ruling-in-favor-of-trump-in-ftc-commissioner-case%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2518938&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to issue a landmark decision that could <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/trumps-executive-strategy-tests-presidential-powers-washington-examiner\/\" title=\"Trump\u2019s executive strategy tests ...ial powers - Washington Examiner\">expand presidential authority<\/a> by allowing the president to remove officials from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/biden-admin-sued-for-allegedly-hiding-records-on-hostile-takeover-of-federal-deposit-insurance-corporation\/\" title=\"Biden Admin Sued for Allegedly Hiding Records on &quot;Hostile Takeover&quot; of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation\">independent federal agencies<\/a> at will. This case centers on former President Donald TrumpS attempt to fire a Federal Trade Commission commissioner, which was previously blocked based on a nearly century-old precedent from *Humphrey&#8217;s Executor v. United States*, limiting presidential removal powers to protect agency independence. During oral arguments, conservative justices questioned the continued relevance of this precedent in today&#8217;s regulatory surroundings, highlighting constitutional and liberty concerns. A ruling in trump&#8217;s favor would shift the balance of power, increasing executive control and accountability over independent agencies, though critics warn it may politicize regulatory enforcement. The decision, anticipated by mid-2026, could have wide implications for various federal agencies beyond the FTC, potentially reshaping executive agency oversight for years to come.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<p><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><\/p>\n<section> \t\t\t\t<script>console.log(\"ad slot (AC1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC2)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC3)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC4)\")<\/script><\/p>\n<p>Well, this probably won&rsquo;t go over well with the critics of President Donald Trump.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. Supreme Court appears poised to issue a historic ruling that could expand presidential authority and validate Trump&rsquo;s efforts to remove independent federal agency officials, as reported by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2025\/12\/08\/supreme-court-slaughter-trump-firings-00681078\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Politico<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/legal\/government\/fight-over-trumps-power-fire-ftc-member-heads-us-supreme-court-2025-12-08\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Reuters<\/a> noted that the case involves Trump&rsquo;s attempt to fire a commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission, a move initially blocked by lower courts citing a 90-year-old precedent.<\/p>\n<p>That precedent, <em>Humphrey&rsquo;s Executor v. United States<\/em>, has long limited the president&rsquo;s ability to remove officials from independent agencies without cause.<\/p>\n<p>Trump argued that the restriction unfairly shields bureaucrats from accountability and impedes the president&rsquo;s ability to implement the law.<\/p>\n<p> <script type=\"text\/javascript\"> \t\t\tif ( getCookie( \"ff_subbed\" ) ) { \t\t\t\tdocument.getElementById(\"stnvideo\").remove() \t\t\t} else { \t\t\t\tdocument.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\", function() { \t\t\t\t\tfunction loadScript(src) { \t\t\t\t\t\tconst script=document.createElement(\"script\"); \t\t\t\t\t\tscript.src=src; \t\t\t\t\t\tscript.async=true; \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.body.appendChild(script); \t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\tfunction findPreviousParagraph(selector, x) { \t\t\t\t\t\tconst targetElement=document.querySelector(selector); \t\t\t\t\t\tif (!targetElement) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.warn(\"Target element not found.\"); \t\t\t\t\t\t\treturn null; \t\t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Get all <\/p>\n<p> elements in order as they appear in the document \t\t\t\t\t\tlet paragraphs=Array.from(document.querySelectorAll(\"p\"));  \t\t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Find the index of the last <\/p>\n<p> before the target element \t\t\t\t\t\tlet targetIndex=paragraphs.findIndex(p=> p.compareDocumentPosition(targetElement) & Node.DOCUMENT_POSITION_PRECEDING);  \t\t\t\t\t\tif (targetIndex===-1 || targetIndex <x) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.warn(\"Not enough paragraphs before the target element.\"); \t\t\t\t\t\t\treturn null; \t\t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\treturn paragraphs[targetIndex - x]; \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Set up IntersectionObserver \t\t\t\t\tfunction observeElement(element) { \t\t\t\t\t\tif (!element) return;  \t\t\t\t\t\tconst observer=new IntersectionObserver( \t\t\t\t\t\t\t(entries)=> { \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tentries.forEach(entry=> { \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tif (entry.isIntersecting) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.log(\"Paragraph is now visible:\", entry.target.textContent.trim()); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tloadScript(\"https:\/\/embed.sendtonews.com\/player3\/embedcode.js?fk=s28Az7AY\"); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tobserver.disconnect(); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t}, \t\t\t\t\t\t\t{ threshold: 0.5 } \/\/ Adjust threshold as needed \t\t\t\t\t\t);  \t\t\t\t\t\tobserver.observe(element); \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Find the 1st paragraph before #stnvideo and observe it \t\t\t\t\tlet paragraphToObserve=findPreviousParagraph(\"#stnvideo\", 2); \t\t\t\t\tobserveElement(paragraphToObserve); \t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t} \t\t<\/script> <\/p>\n<p>During oral arguments Monday, the conservative majority on SCOTUS raised questions about whether the 1935 ruling remains relevant in the modern regulatory state.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;I think broad delegations to <a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/3YuVZYV\" >unaccountable independent agencies raise enormous constitutional<\/a> and real world problems for individual liberty,&rdquo; Justice Brett Kavanaugh said, according to the Politico report.<\/p>\n<p>Legal experts say a decision favoring Trump could fundamentally shift the balance of power between the executive branch and independent agencies.<\/p>\n<p>Under such a ruling, presidents would gain the ability to remove commissioners at will, allowing for direct oversight and alignment with the administration&rsquo;s policy priorities.<\/p>\n<p>Supporters have argued that this change would restore accountability and ensure that agency leaders answer to elected officials, rather than operating as unchecked bureaucratic fiefdoms.<\/p>\n<p>Trump backers say the decision could vindicate prior firings and give future administrations the flexibility to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/dismantling-the-deep-state-begins-on-day-one-of-trump-2-0\/\" title=\"Dismantling The Deep State Begins On Day One Of Trump 2.0\">shape federal agencies<\/a> according to policy goals.<\/p>\n<p>Critics caution that weakening <em>Humphrey&rsquo;s<\/em> protections could politicize regulatory enforcement, but supporters contend that agencies already wield immense authority without sufficient democratic oversight.<\/p>\n<p>The case is closely watched because it tests a fundamental question about executive power and the reach of independent agencies.<\/p>\n<p>A ruling in Trump&rsquo;s favor would extend beyond the FTC, potentially affecting other agencies such as the SEC, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and labor regulators.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court&rsquo;s decision is expected by mid-2026, leaving the issue unresolved until the end of the term.<\/p>\n<p>For Trump and his supporters, a favorable ruling would represent not just a personal victory, but a lasting legacy that reshapes executive authority for decades to come.<\/p>\n<p>While opponents warn of overreach, proponents frame the case as correcting a 90-year imbalance that undermined the president&rsquo;s ability to ensure agencies reflect the will of the electorate.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position: relative;\">\n<div class=\"ff-fancy-header-container\"> \t\t\t \t<\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-submit-correction inner-content\">\n<div class=\"correction-form\">\n<form style=\"display: none;\">\n<div class=\"sc-name-field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* Name<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"name\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<div class=\"sc--field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* <\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<label>* Message<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t<textarea name=\"message\" required><\/textarea> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"required-message\" style=\"display: none; padding-bottom: 15px;\">* All fields are required.<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"submit\" value=\"Submit\" onclick=\"event.preventDefault(); firefly_sc();\"> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"firefly-sc-confirm\" style=\"display: none;\">Success!<\/div>\n<\/p><\/form>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p> \t\t<script> \t\t\tfunction firefly_sc() { \t\t\t\tif( typeof window.captchaPublicKey==typeof undefined ){ \t\t\t\t\tconsole.error('window.captchaPublicKey is not defined'); \t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\tgrecaptcha.execute( window.captchaPublicKey, { action: 'submit_correction' } ).then( function( token ) { \t\t\t\t\tvar opts={ \t\t\t\t\t\taction:    'firefly_sc_submit', \t\t\t\t\t\tname:      document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"name\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\t:     document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tmessage:   document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"message\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tpost_id:   firefly_post_id, \t\t\t\t\t\tcap_token: token \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tvar inputs=[ 'name', '', 'message' ];  \t\t\t\t\tfor( var i=0; i <inputs.length; i++ ) if( ! ( opts[inputs[i]]=document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"' + inputs[i] + '\"]' ).value ) ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .required-message' ).style.display='block'; \t\t\t\t\t\treturn; \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction input[type=\"submit\"]' ).style.display='none'; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).src=firefly_loading_gif_url; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display='inline-block';  \t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( 'ma subbing' );  \t\t\t\t\tif( firefly_post_id ) opts['post_id']=firefly_post_id;  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Send the data using post with element id name and name2*\/ \t\t\t\t\tvar posting=jQuery.post( firefly_ajax_url, opts );  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Alerts the results *\/ \t\t\t\t\tposting.done( function( response ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tif( response.success ) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( response.data ); \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display='none'; \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-confirm' ).style.display='block';  \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdataLayer.push( { 'event': 'submit-correction' } ); \t\t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t} \t\t<\/script> \t     \t\t\t\t\t\t     \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p style=\"border: 1px solid #f5f5f5; padding: 16px;\">Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/advertise-us\/?wj_source=article\">Advertise Today<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><script>console.log(\"ad slot (BA1)\")<\/script> \t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"ff-fancy-header-container\"> \t\t\t \t<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Certainly! Here&#8217;s a paraphrased version of the provided text:<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>This development is unlikely to be well-received by critics of President Donald Trump. The U.S. Supreme Court seems ready to deliver a landmark decision that could broaden presidential powers and support Trump&#8217;s attempts to dismiss officials from independent federal agencies, according to Politico. Reuters highlighted that the case centers on Trump&#8217;s effort to remove a Federal Trade Commission commissioner-a move previously blocked by lower courts based on a nearly century-old precedent.<\/p>\n<p>That precedent, Humphrey&#8217;s Executor v. United States, has traditionally restricted the president&#8217;s ability to remove officials from independent agencies without cause. Trump contends that this limitation protects bureaucrats from accountability and hampers the president&#8217;s capacity to enforce laws effectively.<\/p>\n<p>During Monday&#8217;s oral arguments, the conservative majority on the Supreme Court questioned whether this 1935 ruling remains applicable in today&#8217;s regulatory environment. Justice Brett Kavanaugh remarked that broad delegations of power to unaccountable independent agencies pose significant constitutional and practical challenges for individual freedoms.<\/p>\n<p>Legal analysts suggest that if the court sides with Trump, it could significantly alter the balance of power between the executive branch and independent agencies. Such a ruling would grant presidents greater authority to remove commissioners at will, enabling closer oversight and alignment with administration policies.<\/p>\n<p>Proponents argue this change would enhance accountability by ensuring agency leaders answer directly to elected officials rather than functioning as autonomous bureaucracies. Supporters also believe it could justify previous firings and provide future administrations more flexibility in shaping federal agencies according to their policy objectives.<\/p>\n<p>Opponents warn that weakening Humphrey&#8217;s protections risks politicizing regulatory enforcement; however, supporters counter that these agencies already hold substantial power without adequate democratic control.<\/p>\n<p>This case is closely watched because it addresses fundamental questions about executive authority and limits on independent agencies&#8217; reach. A decision favoring Trump could have implications beyond just the FTC-potentially affecting bodies like the SEC, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and labor regulators.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court is expected to issue its ruling by mid-2026, leaving this issue unresolved until then. For Trump and his allies, a favorable outcome would not only be a personal win but also establish a lasting precedent reshaping presidential power for years ahead. While critics caution against potential overreach, supporters view this as correcting an outdated imbalance that has hindered presidents&#8217; ability to ensure federal agencies reflect voters&#8217; interests.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Let me know if you want it shortened or adjusted further!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2518939,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Supreme-Court-building.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[33651],"tags":[62474,68454,32285,32275,3634],"class_list":["post-2518938","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-western-journal","tag-ftc-commissioner","tag-historic-ruling","tag-legal-case","tag-supreme-court","tag-trump"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Supreme-Court-building.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2518938","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2518938"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2518938\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2518942,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2518938\/revisions\/2518942"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2518939"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2518938"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2518938"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2518938"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}