{"id":2483302,"date":"2025-09-07T06:33:02","date_gmt":"2025-09-07T10:33:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/police-union-republicans-sound-alarm-on-kamala-harris-security-detail\/"},"modified":"2025-09-07T06:34:52","modified_gmt":"2025-09-07T10:34:52","slug":"police-union-republicans-sound-alarm-on-kamala-harris-security-detail","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/police-union-republicans-sound-alarm-on-kamala-harris-security-detail\/","title":{"rendered":"Police union, Republicans sound alarm on Kamala Harris security detail"},"content":{"rendered":"

20<\/div>SHARES<\/span><\/div>

<\/span>Facebook<\/span><\/a><\/span>Twitter<\/span><\/a>

The article discusses controversy surrounding taxpayer-funded security provided<\/a> to former vice President Kamala Harris by the los angeles Police Department (LAPD) and California Highway Patrol (CHP). This security detail was arranged after former President Donald Trump revoked Harris’s Secret Service protection. The security is reportedly coordinated in response to safety concerns,with approval from Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and California Governor Gavin Newsom.<\/p>\n

The move has drawn criticism from the Los Angeles Police Protective League and some Republican lawmakers, who argue that it diverts police resources from public safety and improperly uses taxpayer money to protect a wealthy, former presidential candidate. They contend that former vice presidents typically receive Secret Service protection for six months after leaving office, and that Harris’s extended protection is unusual and unfair.<\/p>\n

Supporters, including some Democratic commentators, defend the security as necessary due to threats fueled by political rhetoric and recent violence targeting public officials affiliated with the Democratic Party. The CHP and LAPD have not disclosed the duration or cost of this security arrangement, citing operational security. The dispute reflects broader political tensions regarding security protocols for former officials and the use of public funds.

\n<\/p>\n