The majority opinion disregarded the administration’s logic, saying they “found no invasion or predatory incursion” in this case.<\/p>\n

“A country’s encouraging its residents and citizens to enter this country illegally is not the modern-day equivalent of sending an armed, organized force to occupy, to disrupt, or to otherwise harm the United States,” the majority wrote.<\/p>\n

Oldham scorched his colleagues in a lengthy dissent, arguing that the ruling corroded the president’s preeminent role in foreign affairs and national security.<\/p>\n

“The majority’s approach to this case is not only unprecedented, it is contrary to more than 200 years of precedent,” Oldham wrote.<\/p>\n

He also warned that the majority ruling risks turning federal judges<\/a> into “robed crusaders who get to playact as multitudinous Commanders in Chief.”<\/p>\n

FIRST FEDERAL JUDGE APPROVES TRUMP’S USE OF ALIEN ENEMIES ACT FOR DEPORTATIONS<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

The Trump administration is almost certain to appeal the matter to the Supreme Court. The nation’s highest court previously ruled that Trump could deport people under the act, but they had to be able to argue their case in court first.<\/p>\n

Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act has seen a seesaw of opinions in the U.S. court system. Judge Stephanie Haines of the U.S. District Court<\/a> for the Western District of Pennsylvania ruled in favor of Trump in May, agreeing with the administration’s logic.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n