{"id":2478498,"date":"2025-08-25T13:24:02","date_gmt":"2025-08-25T17:24:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/citizens-united-ii-supreme-court-urged-to-kill-party-spending-caps\/"},"modified":"2025-08-25T13:27:04","modified_gmt":"2025-08-25T17:27:04","slug":"citizens-united-ii-supreme-court-urged-to-kill-party-spending-caps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/citizens-united-ii-supreme-court-urged-to-kill-party-spending-caps\/","title":{"rendered":"Citizens United II: Supreme Court urged to kill party spending caps"},"content":{"rendered":"

22<\/div>SHARES<\/span><\/div>

<\/span>Facebook<\/span><\/a><\/span>Twitter<\/span><\/a>

The article discusses a significant new progress in campaign finance law<\/a> where the U.S. Department of Justice has urged the supreme Court to overturn existing limits on coordinated spending between political parties and candidates. This legal challenge, National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, seeks to allow political parties to spend unlimited amounts of money in coordination with candidates, perhaps fueling a surge in campaign spending<\/a>. The DOJ argues that the current spending caps violate<\/a> the Frist Amendment by restricting the political speech of parties, especially in the context of modern expensive campaigns. This case is seen as a possible extension of the landmark 2010 Citizens united decision, which removed spending limits<\/a> on corporations and outside groups. While Democrats oppose the change, some may support it if the court overturns a 2001 precedent allowing Congress to impose spending limits on parties. Legal experts note the unusual nature of the DOJ urging the court to directly reverse itself. The Supreme court is expected to consider the case, indicating a likely shift in campaign finance regulations.

\n<\/p>\n

\n