{"id":2452957,"date":"2025-06-27T14:05:02","date_gmt":"2025-06-27T18:05:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/amy-coney-barrett-dismisses-ketanji-brown-jacksons-dissent-on-injunctions\/"},"modified":"2025-06-27T14:06:27","modified_gmt":"2025-06-27T18:06:27","slug":"amy-coney-barrett-dismisses-ketanji-brown-jacksons-dissent-on-injunctions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/amy-coney-barrett-dismisses-ketanji-brown-jacksons-dissent-on-injunctions\/","title":{"rendered":"Amy Coney Barrett dismisses Ketanji Brown Jackson&#8217;s dissent on injunctions"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">20<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Famy-coney-barrett-dismisses-ketanji-brown-jacksons-dissent-on-injunctions%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2452957&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>Justice amy Coney Barrett has dismissed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson&#8217;s dissent regarding a Supreme Court decision that restricts the ability of federal judges to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/senate-republicans-must-resist-bidens-judicial-nominees\/\" title=\"Senate Republicans Must Resist Biden&#039;s Judicial Nominees\">issue nationwide injunctions<\/a> against the executive branch. In her dissent, Jackson argued that lower courts should not have limits on their authority to issue such injunctions and maintained that the executive branch is obligated to comply with them. Barrett, in the majority opinion of a 6-3 ruling, countered Jackson&#8217;s argument, stating that it contradicts over two centuries of legal precedent and the Constitution.She criticized Jackson for advocating an expansive judicial overreach while calling for limitations on executive power. Barrett emphasized that while the executive must follow the law, the judiciary does not possess unlimited authority to enforce it, reminding that the Judiciary Act of 1789 sets boundaries on judicial authority. The <a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/3YuVZYV\" >ruling notably addressed challenges<\/a> to a Trump administration executive order regarding birthright citizenship.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<p><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><\/p>\n<div class=\"tdb-block-inner td-fix-index\"><span class=\"tdb-mobile-menu-button\"><i class=\"tdb-mobile-menu-icon td-icon-mobile\"><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"tdb-block-inner td-fix-index\"><span class=\"tdb-header-search-button-mob dropdown-toggle\" data-toggle=\"dropdown\"><i class=\"tdb-mobile-search-icon td-icon-search\"><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"tdb-block-inner td-fix-index\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"tdb-block-inner td-fix-index\"><span class=\"tdb-mobile-menu-button\"><i class=\"tdb-mobile-menu-icon td-icon-mobile\"><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"tdb-block-inner td-fix-index\">\n<div class=\"tdb-drop-down-search\" aria-labelledby=\"td-header-search-button\">\n<div class=\"tdb-drop-down-search-inner\">\n<form method=\"get\" class=\"tdb-search-form\" action=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/\"><\/form>\n<div class=\"tdb-aj-search\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/#\" role=\"button\" aria-label=\"Search\" class=\"tdb-head-search-btn dropdown-toggle\" data-toggle=\"dropdown\"><i class=\"tdb-search-icon td-icon-search\"><\/i><\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"tdb-block-inner td-fix-index\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"tdb-block-inner td-fix-index\">\n<h1 class=\"tdb-title-text\">Amy Coney Barrett dismisses Ketanji Brown Jackson&rsquo;s dissent on nationwide injunction decision<\/h1>\n<div><\/div>\n<div class=\"tdb-title-line\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"tdb-block-inner td-fix-index\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"tdb-block-inner td-fix-index\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"tdb-block-inner td-fix-index\">\n<div id=\"Brid_2160042\" class=\"tpd-featured-video bridtv\"><\/div>\n<p>Justice <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/amy-coney-barrett\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"Amy Coney Barrett\">Amy Coney Barrett<\/a> dismissed Justice <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/ketanji-brown-jackson\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"Ketanji Brown Jackson's\">Ketanji Brown Jackson&rsquo;s<\/a> dissent to a new <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"Amy Coney Barrett\">Supreme Court<\/a> decision that limits the power of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions against the executive branch, a problem that the Trump administration has faced for months.<\/p>\n<p>Jackson claimed lower courts do not have limits on their authority to issue universal injunctions, writing that the executive branch should always comply with said injunctions.<\/p>\n<div class=\"recommended-stories\">\n<h2>Recommended Stories<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/supreme-court\/3456028\/supreme-court-louisiana-gerrymandering-map-racial-redistricting-case\/\">Supreme Court to rehear arguments next term in Louisiana racial redistricting case<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/supreme-court\/3455697\/free-speech-coalition-v-paxton-supreme-court-pornography-case-age-verification-laws\/\">Supreme Court upholds pornography age-verification laws<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/supreme-court\/3455080\/mahmoud-v-taylor-supreme-court-parents-right-opt-kids-out-lgbt-books\/\">Supreme Court sides with parents who want to opt kids out of LGBT school books<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"article-paywall\">\n<p>Barrett did not entertain her liberal colleague&rsquo;s argument.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;We will not dwell on Justice Jackson&rsquo;s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries&rsquo; worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself,&rdquo; Barrett wrote in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/24pdf\/24a884_8n59.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"6-3 majority opinion\">6-3 majority opinion<\/a>. &ldquo;We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;No one disputes that the Executive has a duty to follow the law,&rdquo; Barrett continued. &ldquo;But the Judiciary does not have unbridled authority to enforce this obligation&mdash;in fact, sometimes the law prohibits the Judiciary from doing so.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/supreme-court\/3455997\/supreme-court-nationwide-injunctions-trump-birthright-citizenship-case\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"\">Supreme Court ruled<\/a> Friday that district courts exceeded their power by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/clarence-thomas-makes-the-point-of-the-day-as-supreme-court-hears-arguments-in-birthright-citizenship-case\/\" title=\"Clarence Thomas Makes the Point of the Day as Supreme ... Hears Arguments in ...\">issuing universal injunctions<\/a> against President Donald Trump&rsquo;s executive order to take away birthright citizenship for children of those who entered the country illegally. The court did not rule on the merits of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/biden-admin-tells-scotus-to-pass-on-birthright-citizenship-case\/\" title=\"Biden Admin Tells SCOTUS to Pass on ... Case\">birthright citizenship case<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh joined Barrett in the majority opinion. Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan joined Jackson in the dissenting opinion.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/supreme-court\/3455997\/supreme-court-nationwide-injunctions-trump-birthright-citizenship-case\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"SUPREME COURT LIMITS NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS IN TRUMP BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP CASE\">SUPREME COURT LIMITS NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS IN TRUMP BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP CASE<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Barrett continued critiquing Jackson&rsquo;s reasoning and cited the Judiciary Act of 1789, which requires judges to observe their limits on judicial authority. Barrett said Jackson &ldquo;skips over that part&rdquo; because the law &ldquo;involves boring &lsquo;legalese,&#8217;&rdquo; as Jackson put it.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;Justice Jackson would do well to heed her own admonition: &lsquo;Everyone, from the President on down, is bound by law,&#8217;&rdquo; Barrett concluded. &ldquo;That goes for judges, too.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p> <script data-cfasync=\"false\" src=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/cdn-cgi\/scripts\/5c5dd728\/cloudflare-static\/email-decode.min.js\"><\/script><script>!function(){var g=window;g.googletag=g.googletag||{},g.googletag.cmd=g.googletag.cmd||[],g.googletag.cmd.push(function(){g.googletag.pubads().setTargeting(\"has-featured-video\",\"true\")})}();<\/script><script>var _bp=_bp||[];_bp.push({\"div\":\"Brid_2160042\",\"obj\":{\"id\":\"27789\",\"width\":\"1280\",\"height\":\"720\",\"stickyDirection\":\"below\",\"video\":\"2160042\"}});<\/script><script defer src=\"https:\/\/services.brid.tv\/player\/build\/brid.min.js\"><\/script><\/div>\n<div class=\"tdb-block-inner td-fix-index\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"tdb-block-inner td-fix-index\"><\/div>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Barrett rejects Jackson&#8217;s dissent on nationwide injunctions<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2159,"featured_media":2452958,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/barrett.webp","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[33229,38419,33047,56226,32275],"class_list":["post-2452957","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-amy-coney-barrett","tag-injunctions","tag-ketanji-brown-jackson","tag-legal-opinions","tag-supreme-court"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/barrett.webp","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2452957","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2159"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2452957"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2452957\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2452961,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2452957\/revisions\/2452961"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2452958"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2452957"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2452957"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2452957"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}