{"id":2452466,"date":"2025-06-26T14:48:59","date_gmt":"2025-06-26T18:48:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/planned-parenthood-facing-catastrophic-consequences-after-supreme-court-rules-against-group\/"},"modified":"2025-06-26T14:52:23","modified_gmt":"2025-06-26T18:52:23","slug":"planned-parenthood-facing-catastrophic-consequences-after-supreme-court-rules-against-group","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/planned-parenthood-facing-catastrophic-consequences-after-supreme-court-rules-against-group\/","title":{"rendered":"Planned Parenthood Facing &#8216;Catastrophic Consequences&#8217; After Supreme Court Rules Against Group"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">22<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fplanned-parenthood-facing-catastrophic-consequences-after-supreme-court-rules-against-group%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2452466&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>On thursday morning, the Supreme Court of the United States issued several significant decisions, one of which involved the case medina v.Planned Parenthood South Atlantic. The court, in a 6-3 ruling, determined that there is no private right of action for individuals to challenge South Carolina&#8217;s decision to terminate Planned parenthood&#8217;s participation in the state&#8217;s Medicaid program.This ruling signifies that Medicaid laws do not provide a clear right to pursue federal civil rights claims. Legal expert Jonathan Turley highlighted the ruling&#8217;s implications, stating it could set a precedent preventing taxpayer funding to Planned Parenthood, which could have <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/tucker-carlson-vladimir-putin-is-not-why-you-cant-afford-to-fill-your-tank\/\" title=\"Tucker Carlson: Vladimir Putin Is &#039;Not Why You Can&#039;t Afford to Fill Your Tank&#039;\">severe financial consequences<\/a> for the institution, as one-third of its revenue comes from government sources. The majority opinion, authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch, rejected Planned Parenthood&#8217;s argument that its exclusion violated the &#8220;any-qualified-provider&#8221; provision of Medicaid. Turley characterized Planned Parenthood as the &#8220;big loser&#8221; in this decision, while contrasting the majority&#8217;s opinion with the dissenting views of Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<p><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><\/p>\n<section> \t\t\t\t<script>console.log(\"ad slot (AC1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC2)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC3)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC4)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_0)\")<\/script><\/p>\n<p>Thursday morning saw a flurry of decisions and updates from the Supreme Court of the United States.<\/p>\n<p>Many were helpfully captured in a long thread by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/legal-expert-jonathan-turley-says-courts-intruding-trumps-authority-way-cant-stand\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">legal expert Jonathan Turley<\/a> on X, who chronicled the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/trumps-cabinet-is-not-just-stacked-with-yes-men\/\" title=\"Trump&#039;s Cabinet is not just stacked with &#039;yes men&#039;\">rapid-fire announcements<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Buried in that thread was a key decision that SCOTUS made in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/24pdf\/23-1275_e2pg.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the case<\/a> of Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">&hellip;The Court considered whether there is a private right of action for people to challenge South Carolina&rsquo;s decision to end Planned Parenthood&rsquo;s participation in the state&rsquo;s Medicaid program. The Court says no. Medicaid laws do not give an unambiguous right to bring a federal&hellip;<\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/JonathanTurley\/status\/1938238616506908887?\">June 26, 2025<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p> <script type=\"text\/javascript\"> \t\t\tif ( getCookie( \"ff_subbed\" ) ) { \t\t\t\tdocument.getElementById(\"stnvideo\").remove() \t\t\t} else { \t\t\t\tdocument.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\", function() { \t\t\t\t\tfunction loadScript(src) { \t\t\t\t\t\tconst script=document.createElement(\"script\"); \t\t\t\t\t\tscript.src=src; \t\t\t\t\t\tscript.async=true; \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.body.appendChild(script); \t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\tfunction findPreviousParagraph(selector, x) { \t\t\t\t\t\tconst targetElement=document.querySelector(selector); \t\t\t\t\t\tif (!targetElement) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.warn(\"Target element not found.\"); \t\t\t\t\t\t\treturn null; \t\t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Get all <\/p>\n<p> elements in order as they appear in the document \t\t\t\t\t\tlet paragraphs=Array.from(document.querySelectorAll(\"p\"));  \t\t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Find the index of the last <\/p>\n<p> before the target element \t\t\t\t\t\tlet targetIndex=paragraphs.findIndex(p=> p.compareDocumentPosition(targetElement) & Node.DOCUMENT_POSITION_PRECEDING);  \t\t\t\t\t\tif (targetIndex===-1 || targetIndex <x) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.warn(\"Not enough paragraphs before the target element.\"); \t\t\t\t\t\t\treturn null; \t\t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\treturn paragraphs[targetIndex - x]; \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Set up IntersectionObserver \t\t\t\t\tfunction observeElement(element) { \t\t\t\t\t\tif (!element) return;  \t\t\t\t\t\tconst observer=new IntersectionObserver( \t\t\t\t\t\t\t(entries)=> { \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tentries.forEach(entry=> { \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tif (entry.isIntersecting) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.log(\"Paragraph is now visible:\", entry.target.textContent.trim()); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tloadScript(\"https:\/\/embed.sendtonews.com\/player3\/embedcode.js?fk=s28Az7AY\"); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tobserver.disconnect(); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t}, \t\t\t\t\t\t\t{ threshold: 0.5 } \/\/ Adjust threshold as needed \t\t\t\t\t\t);  \t\t\t\t\t\tobserver.observe(element); \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Find the 1st paragraph before #stnvideo and observe it \t\t\t\t\tlet paragraphToObserve=findPreviousParagraph(\"#stnvideo\", 2); \t\t\t\t\tobserveElement(paragraphToObserve); \t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t} \t\t<\/script> <\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;We have our second opinion. It is Medina v. Planned Parenthood, an important case that has not drawn as much attention,&rdquo; Turley explained. &ldquo;It is written by Justice Gorsuch in a 6-3 opinion.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>Turley further explained: &ldquo;The Court considered whether there is a private right of action for people to challenge South Carolina&rsquo;s decision to end Planned Parenthood&rsquo;s participation in the state&rsquo;s Medicaid program. The Court says no. Medicaid laws do not give an unambiguous right to bring a <a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/3YuVZYV\" >federal civil rights action<\/a>.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>As Turning Point USA&rsquo;s Charlie Kirk pointed out, this creates a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/is-the-democrats-election-heist-too-big-to-fail\/\" title=\"Is the Democrats\u2019 Election Heist \u2018Too Big to Fail\u2019?\">legal precedent<\/a> that would <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-u-s-still-hasnt-banned-contracting-with-wuhan-senator-says-thats-batty\/\" title=\"The U.S. Still Hasn\u2019t Banned Contracting With Wuhan. Senator Says That\u2019s \u2018Batty.\u2019\">prevent taxpayer money<\/a> from going towards <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/planned-parenthood-attempts-play-victim-handing-sexually-explicit-books-8-year-olds\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Planned Parenthood<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">BREAKING: The Supreme Court has ruled in a 6-3 decision in the Medina v. Planned Parenthood case that state Medicaid programs can DEFUND Planned Parenthood.<\/p>\n<p>Huge breakthrough for the cause of life. Planned Parenthood should absolutely NOT receive a dime of taxpayer money.<\/p>\n<p>H\/T:&hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/766TeWvwC2\">pic.twitter.com\/766TeWvwC2<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/charliekirk11\/status\/1938246668132221104?\">June 26, 2025<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;Huge breakthrough for the cause of life. Planned Parenthood should absolutely NOT receive a dime of taxpayer money,&rdquo; Kirk argued.<\/p>\n<p>Because of this &mdash; and Planned Parenthood&rsquo;s own admission &mdash; Turley outed the medical organization as the &ldquo;big loser&rdquo; of Thursday&rsquo;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/major-victory-supreme-court-issues-ruling-ban-transgender-procedures-minors\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">SCOTUS<\/a> flurry.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">The big loser today is Planned Parenthood. The Court ruled in Medina that South Carolina could bar public funding and that there is a right to sue. The group said that this would have &ldquo;catastrophic consequences,&rdquo; since one-third of its revenue comes from government funding&hellip;<\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/JonathanTurley\/status\/1938241577086034026?\">June 26, 2025<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;The big loser today is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/planned-parenthood-ceo-freaks-trump-admin-prepares-enact-major-funding-freeze-report\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Planned Parenthood<\/a>,&rdquo; Turley argued. &ldquo;The Court ruled in Medina that South Carolina could bar public funding and that there is a right to sue.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;The group said that this would have &lsquo;catastrophic consequences,&rsquo; since one-third of its revenue comes from government funding.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>The 6-3 Supreme Court ruling (Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented) saw Justice Neil Gorsuch write the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/24pdf\/23-1275_e2pg.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">opinion<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;[Planned Parenthood] argued that South Carolina&rsquo;s exclusion of Planned Parenthood from its Medicaid program violated the any-qualified-provider provision,&rdquo; Gorsuch wrote.<\/p>\n<p>(Gorsuch describes the &ldquo;any-qualified-provider&rdquo; provision as such: &ldquo;This case involves the any-qualified-provider provision &hellip; which requires States to ensure that &lsquo;any individual eligible for medical assistance . . . may obtain&rsquo; it &lsquo;from any [provider] qualified to perform the service . . . who undertakes to provide&rsquo; it.&rdquo;)<\/p>\n<p>The majority of the Supreme Court clearly did not think that there was some sort of any-qualified-provider provision violation, much to the chagrin of the three female liberal justices.<\/p>\n<p>The Alliance Defending Freedom <a href=\"https:\/\/adflegal.org\/case\/medina-v-planned-parenthood-south-atlantic\/#case-details\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">argued<\/a> this case.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position: relative;\">\n<div class=\"ff-fancy-header-container\"> \t\t\t \t<\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-submit-correction inner-content\">\n<div class=\"correction-form\">\n<form style=\"display: none;\">\n<div class=\"sc-name-field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* Name<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"name\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<div class=\"sc--field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* <\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<label>* Message<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t<textarea name=\"message\" required><\/textarea> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"required-message\" style=\"display: none; padding-bottom: 15px;\">* All fields are required.<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"submit\" value=\"Submit\" onclick=\"event.preventDefault(); firefly_sc();\"> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"firefly-sc-confirm\" style=\"display: none;\">Success!<\/div>\n<\/p><\/form>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p> \t\t<script> \t\t\tfunction firefly_sc() { \t\t\t\tif( typeof window.captchaPublicKey==typeof undefined ){ \t\t\t\t\tconsole.error('window.captchaPublicKey is not defined'); \t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\tgrecaptcha.execute( window.captchaPublicKey, { action: 'submit_correction' } ).then( function( token ) { \t\t\t\t\tvar opts={ \t\t\t\t\t\taction:    'firefly_sc_submit', \t\t\t\t\t\tname:      document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"name\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\t:     document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tmessage:   document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"message\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tpost_id:   firefly_post_id, \t\t\t\t\t\tcap_token: token \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tvar inputs=[ 'name', '', 'message' ];  \t\t\t\t\tfor( var i=0; i <inputs.length; i++ ) if( ! ( opts[inputs[i]]=document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"' + inputs[i] + '\"]' ).value ) ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .required-message' ).style.display='block'; \t\t\t\t\t\treturn; \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction input[type=\"submit\"]' ).style.display='none'; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).src=firefly_loading_gif_url; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display='inline-block';  \t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( 'ma subbing' );  \t\t\t\t\tif( firefly_post_id ) opts['post_id']=firefly_post_id;  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Send the data using post with element id name and name2*\/ \t\t\t\t\tvar posting=jQuery.post( firefly_ajax_url, opts );  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Alerts the results *\/ \t\t\t\t\tposting.done( function( response ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tif( response.success ) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( response.data ); \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display='none'; \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-confirm' ).style.display='block';  \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdataLayer.push( { 'event': 'submit-correction' } ); \t\t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t} \t\t<\/script> \t     \t\t\t\t\t\t     \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p style=\"border: 1px solid #f5f5f5; padding: 16px;\">Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/advertise-us\/?wj_source=article\">Advertise Today<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><script>console.log(\"ad slot (BA1)\")<\/script> \t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"ff-fancy-header-container\"> \t\t\t \t<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Thursday morning, the Supreme Court of the United States made several important decisions, which were detailed in a lengthy thread by legal expert Jonathan Turley on X. Among these announcements was a significant ruling in the case of Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic. The Court addressed whether individuals have the right to challenge South Carolina&#8217;s decision to terminate Planned Parenthood&#8217;s involvement in its Medicaid program, ultimately concluding that they do not. According to Turley, this ruling indicates that Medicaid laws do not provide a clear right for federal civil rights actions. Charlie Kirk from Turning Point USA highlighted that this sets a legal precedent preventing taxpayer funds from supporting Planned Parenthood, calling it a major victory for pro-life advocates. Turley noted that Planned Parenthood emerged as the &#8220;big loser&#8221; from this decision since one-third of its revenue relies on government funding and described potential consequences as &#8220;catastrophic.&#8221; The 6-3 ruling was authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch, with dissenting opinions from Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2452467,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Planned-Parenthood-3.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[33651],"tags":[37719,40917,37662,36292,32275],"class_list":["post-2452466","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-western-journal","tag-healthcare-access","tag-legal-decisions","tag-planned-parenthood","tag-reproductive-rights","tag-supreme-court"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Planned-Parenthood-3.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2452466","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2452466"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2452466\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2452470,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2452466\/revisions\/2452470"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2452467"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2452466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2452466"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2452466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}