{"id":2442156,"date":"2025-06-03T09:19:59","date_gmt":"2025-06-03T13:19:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/why-theyre-losing-the-view-dismisses-dem-masculinity-problems-since-men-are-sexists\/"},"modified":"2025-06-03T09:23:00","modified_gmt":"2025-06-03T13:23:00","slug":"why-theyre-losing-the-view-dismisses-dem-masculinity-problems-since-men-are-sexists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/why-theyre-losing-the-view-dismisses-dem-masculinity-problems-since-men-are-sexists\/","title":{"rendered":"Why They&#8217;re Losing: &#8216;The View&#8217; Dismisses Dem Masculinity Problems Since Men Are &#8216;Sexists"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">26<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fwhy-theyre-losing-the-view-dismisses-dem-masculinity-problems-since-men-are-sexists%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2442156&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>The article discusses the democratic Party&#8217;s struggle to connect with male voters, notably considering a recent New york Times piece detailing their ongoing challenges ahead of the 2024 election. It details how Democratic strategists are trying to regain the support of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/msnbcs-reid-bidens-infrastructure-package-was-white-guy-employment-act\/\" title=\"MSNBC&#039;s Reid: Biden&#039;s Infrastructure Package Was &#039;White Guy Employment Act&#039;\">working-class men<\/a>, highlighting a new initiative labeled &#8220;SAM&#8221; (Speaking with American Men), which plans to research effective communication strategies, even suggesting advertising in video games. <\/p>\n<p>The commentary touches on a segment from &#8220;the View,&#8221; where co-host Joy behar criticized the strategy, suggesting that instead of trying to better communicate with men, Democrats should focus on &#8220;teaching men not to be such sexists.&#8221; This irony underscores the ongoing disconnect between the party&#8217;s approach and its audience,as pointed out by othre panelists who questioned the authenticity of spending millions to understand male voters while simultaneously belittling them. <\/p>\n<p>the article paints a picture of a party in need of effective messaging to engage a notable portion of the electorate, emphasizing the contrast between strategies and rhetoric that may further alienate the demographic they seek to win back.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<p><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><\/p>\n<section> \t\t\t\t<script>console.log(\"ad slot (AC1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC2)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC3)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC4)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_0)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_1)\")<\/script><\/p>\n<p>For those of you who haven&rsquo;t been following The New York Times and the Democratic Party very closely &mdash; and I know given our readership that&rsquo;s probably a goodly portion, and I don&rsquo;t blame any of you, but you are missing out on some spectacular inadvertent comedy &mdash; the party of the American left is having a problem with men.<\/p>\n<p>The problem is so acute that even the ladies of &ldquo;The View&rdquo; are talking about it. Joy Behar&rsquo;s conclusion? Don&rsquo;t try to reach out to these fools, tell them that they&rsquo;re bigots instead. That&rsquo;s the ticket!<\/p>\n<p>So, in case you&rsquo;re catching up, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/watch-jill-biden-steps-joe-struggles-answer-view-co-hosts-question-cognitive-health\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the flibbertigibbet-fest<\/a> on ABC was talking about a much-discussed Thursday <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/05\/25\/us\/politics\/democratic-party-voters.html?utm_source=substack&amp;utm_medium=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">piece<\/a> in the Times about the 2024 election titled &ldquo;Six Months Later, Democrats Are Still Searching for the Path Forward.&rdquo; TL;DR version: After being told in November that the wokeness emperor was naked, the Dems are still struggling to find a clothier, especially with men.<\/p>\n<p>One section of the article, tucked in toward the end, has been the subject of much discussion (and chortling) among the punditocracy:<\/p>\n<p><em>For now, Democratic donors and strategists have been gathering at luxury hotels to discuss how to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/how-democrats-can-adjust-for-2026-elections-and-2028-presidential-race\/\" title=\"How ... can ...just for 2026 elections and 2028 presidential race\">win back working-class voters<\/a>, commissioning new projects that can read like anthropological studies of people from faraway places.<\/em><\/p>\n<p> <script type=\"text\/javascript\"> \t\t\tif ( getCookie( \"ff_subbed\" ) ) { \t\t\t\tdocument.getElementById(\"stnvideo\").remove() \t\t\t} else { \t\t\t\tdocument.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\", function() { \t\t\t\t\tfunction loadScript(src) { \t\t\t\t\t\tconst script=document.createElement(\"script\"); \t\t\t\t\t\tscript.src=src; \t\t\t\t\t\tscript.async=true; \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.body.appendChild(script); \t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\tfunction findPreviousParagraph(selector, x) { \t\t\t\t\t\tconst targetElement=document.querySelector(selector); \t\t\t\t\t\tif (!targetElement) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.warn(\"Target element not found.\"); \t\t\t\t\t\t\treturn null; \t\t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Get all <\/p>\n<p> elements in order as they appear in the document \t\t\t\t\t\tlet paragraphs=Array.from(document.querySelectorAll(\"p\"));  \t\t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Find the index of the last <\/p>\n<p> before the target element \t\t\t\t\t\tlet targetIndex=paragraphs.findIndex(p=> p.compareDocumentPosition(targetElement) & Node.DOCUMENT_POSITION_PRECEDING);  \t\t\t\t\t\tif (targetIndex===-1 || targetIndex <x) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.warn(\"Not enough paragraphs before the target element.\"); \t\t\t\t\t\t\treturn null; \t\t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\treturn paragraphs[targetIndex - x]; \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Set up IntersectionObserver \t\t\t\t\tfunction observeElement(element) { \t\t\t\t\t\tif (!element) return;  \t\t\t\t\t\tconst observer=new IntersectionObserver( \t\t\t\t\t\t\t(entries)=> { \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tentries.forEach(entry=> { \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tif (entry.isIntersecting) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.log(\"Paragraph is now visible:\", entry.target.textContent.trim()); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tloadScript(\"https:\/\/embed.sendtonews.com\/player3\/embedcode.js?fk=s28Az7AY\"); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tobserver.disconnect(); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t}, \t\t\t\t\t\t\t{ threshold: 0.5 } \/\/ Adjust threshold as needed \t\t\t\t\t\t);  \t\t\t\t\t\tobserver.observe(element); \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Find the 1st paragraph before #stnvideo and observe it \t\t\t\t\tlet paragraphToObserve=findPreviousParagraph(\"#stnvideo\", 2); \t\t\t\t\tobserveElement(paragraphToObserve); \t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t} \t\t<\/script> <\/p>\n<p><em>The prospectus for one new $20 million effort, obtained by The Times, aims to reverse the erosion of Democratic support among young men, especially online. It is code-named SAM &mdash; short for &ldquo;Speaking with American Men: A Strategic Plan&rdquo; &mdash; and promises investment to &ldquo;study the syntax, language and content that gains attention and virality in these spaces.&rdquo; It recommends buying advertisements in video games, among other things.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>&ldquo;Above all, we must shift from a moralizing tone,&rdquo; it urges.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Yeah, because there&rsquo;s nothing that says you&rsquo;re straying away from moralizing quite like saying you need to &ldquo;study the syntax, language and context&rdquo; of Americans with Y chromosomes and coming to the conclusion that what you really need is ads in video games. Can&rsquo;t you just picture it? You&rsquo;re in the middle of a game of Grand Theft Auto V and, on the loading screen, a pop-up ad: &ldquo;Sure, guns are fun in video games, but vote Democrat, so we can do away with the Second Amendment! Don&rsquo;t worry, though: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/watch-cnn-captures-journalist-reports-shoplifting-dem-city\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">We&rsquo;ll still let you steal stuff in real life, too<\/a>.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>This is all fun and games (literally) until you watch &ldquo;The View&rdquo; and you realize they really <em>do<\/em> need to spend this money figuring out how to talk to half the American electorate.<\/p>\n<p>Let&rsquo;s face facts here: Aside from the token emphatic <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/john-boltons-plea-to-block-kash-patels-confirmation-exposes-the-swamps-desperation\/\" title=\"John Bolton&#039;s Plea to Block Kash Patel&#039;s Confirmation Exposes the Swamp&#039;s Desperation\">air-quotes &#038;ldquo<\/a>;conservative&rdquo; or two they include, &ldquo;The View&rdquo; is basically a panel discussion, which deals with the concerns of left-leaning women between the ages of 35 and 75. I sometimes laugh to myself when I see ads for Democratic candidates during the show; what do those campaigns suppose was airing <em>before<\/em> the commercial break? Why waste your money duplicating it?<\/p>\n<p>Take Friday&rsquo;s show, where the Times&rsquo; piece &mdash; and a concomitant <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/05\/29\/opinion\/manosphere-democrats-peterson-men.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">opinion column<\/a> by the NYT&rsquo;s resident air-quotes &ldquo;conservative,&rdquo; David French, who said the Democrats were failing to realize &ldquo;the manosphere &hellip; was an organic response to a deep personal need&rdquo; &mdash; &nbsp;was the first item on the agenda.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;Democrats are spending $20 million just to learn how to speak their language,&rdquo; co-host Joy Behar said at the outset of the segment. &ldquo;You heard it, 20 million bucks just to talk to boys. So, is this a good idea or a waste of money?&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/many-democrats-not-happy-joe-biden-messy-appearance-view\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Alyssa Farah Griffin<\/a> &mdash; the air-quotes &ldquo;conservative&rdquo; du jour on the show&rsquo;s panel &mdash; was the only one who managed to get it slightly right, noting that &ldquo;nothing says authenticity like spending $20 millions to pay consultants and strategists and focus groups to tell you how to talk to a certain audience.&rdquo; But after five minutes of babble, Joy announced she had the real answer.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;You know what I think? I think it&rsquo;s a waste of money. Maybe these guys should spend their money on teaching men to not be such sexists,&rdquo; Behar said, to predictable applause:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">Joy Behar argues that Democrats shouldn&rsquo;t try to win back men by showing them respect and not belittling them. Instead her plan: &ldquo;I think it&rsquo;s a waste of money. Maybe these guys should spend their money on teaching men to not be such sexists!&rdquo;<br \/> She then suggests Democratic men&hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/BV8G3LzLqe\">pic.twitter.com\/BV8G3LzLqe<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/NickFondacaro\/status\/1928469686238282152?\">May 30, 2025<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>When <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/mike-johnson-skewers-view-co-hosts-attempting-paint-new-trump-move-racist\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Griffin<\/a> noted that &ldquo;the stats don&rsquo;t bear that out&rdquo; and that if the Democrats want to keep on losing, they can keep on doing that, Behar took that as another opportunity to bash her head against the concrete wall of reality.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;[Trump] was running against a woman, I&rsquo;m telling you,&rdquo; she said.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;You think that Democrats who were with Biden in 2020 left to be with Trump because they&rsquo;re sexist?&rdquo; Griffin said.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;I don&rsquo;t know the reason, but it&rsquo;s very suspicious,&rdquo; Behar said.<\/p>\n<p>She&rsquo;s &ldquo;suspicious?&rdquo; Is this <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/hakeem-jeffries-says-no-election-deniers-side-immediately-learns-isnt-case\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">election denialism<\/a>? I&rsquo;ve been told that&rsquo;s a punishable offense in the media world. <em>J&rsquo;accuse<\/em>, Joy Behar!<\/p>\n<p>If you don&rsquo;t have eight minutes to waste, those comments get no better in context, I assure you &mdash; but if you do, enjoy the self-parodying self-own of the panel normalizing misandry in its full glory:<\/p>\n<div class=\"firefly-embed\"> <iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"YouTube video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/AwgmMHEZqWM?si=sXNT3GC-sUvwSLz9\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<p>Now, while the three paragraphs I d are the ones that got the most attention, the Times&rsquo; piece was actually fairly thorough in noting that this wasn&rsquo;t a Donald v. Hillary or Donald v. Kamala problem, but a Republican v. Democrat problem, particularly as it relates to male voters. Remember, the prediction going into Nov. 5 was that the presidential race would be razor-thin, it was anyone&rsquo;s guess who would take the Senate, but the Democrats had the advantage in the House. The first two were decisively lost by the Democrats; the third was decided by a thin margin &mdash; but still for the Republicans.<\/p>\n<p>Not all of those candidates were women. In fact, all four of the Republicans&rsquo; Senate pickups were male v. male races, so that doesn&rsquo;t compute. Are the ladies of &ldquo;The View&rdquo; really saying that now-former Montana Sen. Jon Tester was too feminine? Was Republican Sen. Deb Fischer&rsquo;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2024\/11\/05\/us\/elections\/results-nebraska.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">larger<\/a>-than-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2024\/10\/28\/us\/politics\/nebraska-texas-senate-races.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">expected<\/a> margin of victory in Nebraska against independent Democratic-leaning candidate Dan Osborn a sign those sexist men can secretly be self-hating, too?<\/p>\n<p>Joy Behar doesn&rsquo;t think about these things because Joy Behar doesn&rsquo;t think, period. Neither does the person who claps along with her.<\/p>\n<p>This is a great scripted line straight from the &ldquo;Republicans are Trump, Democrats are Kamala, vote for the first and you&rsquo;re a sexist and a double-racist since she&rsquo;s black and Indian&rdquo; school of left-wing identitarian reductionism. &nbsp;It all sounds so wonderful on a TV show, lousy on election night.<\/p>\n<p>It&rsquo;s why you need to hole up a bunch of lefty apparatchiks in fancy hotels to decide on a $20 million &ldquo;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=fiOMbqPHFwo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">how do you do, fellow males<\/a>?&rdquo; campaign: Because right after that farce gets splashed all over the pages of the left&rsquo;s official newspaper, the left&rsquo;s <a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/3YuVZYV\" >official gab-fest declares<\/a> that you could spend that money on lecturing &ldquo;men to not be such sexists.&rdquo; Because <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/trump-revenge-fantasy-boastful-3-term-president-executed-diverse-female-soldier-new-civil-war-film\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">that worked so well last year<\/a>, right?<\/p>\n<div style=\"position: relative;\">\n<div class=\"ff-fancy-header-container\"> \t\t\t \t<\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-submit-correction inner-content\">\n<div class=\"correction-form\">\n<form style=\"display: none;\">\n<div class=\"sc-name-field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* Name<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"name\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<div class=\"sc--field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* <\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<label>* Message<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t<textarea name=\"message\" required><\/textarea> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"required-message\" style=\"display: none; padding-bottom: 15px;\">* All fields are required.<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"submit\" value=\"Submit\" onclick=\"event.preventDefault(); firefly_sc();\"> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"firefly-sc-confirm\" style=\"display: none;\">Success!<\/div>\n<\/p><\/form>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p> \t\t<script> \t\t\tfunction firefly_sc() { \t\t\t\tif( typeof window.captchaPublicKey==typeof undefined ){ \t\t\t\t\tconsole.error('window.captchaPublicKey is not defined'); \t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\tgrecaptcha.execute( window.captchaPublicKey, { action: 'submit_correction' } ).then( function( token ) { \t\t\t\t\tvar opts={ \t\t\t\t\t\taction:    'firefly_sc_submit', \t\t\t\t\t\tname:      document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"name\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\t:     document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tmessage:   document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"message\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tpost_id:   firefly_post_id, \t\t\t\t\t\tcap_token: token \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tvar inputs=[ 'name', '', 'message' ];  \t\t\t\t\tfor( var i=0; i <inputs.length; i++ ) if( ! ( opts[inputs[i]]=document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"' + inputs[i] + '\"]' ).value ) ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .required-message' ).style.display='block'; \t\t\t\t\t\treturn; \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction input[type=\"submit\"]' ).style.display='none'; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).src=firefly_loading_gif_url; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display='inline-block';  \t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( 'ma subbing' );  \t\t\t\t\tif( firefly_post_id ) opts['post_id']=firefly_post_id;  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Send the data using post with element id name and name2*\/ \t\t\t\t\tvar posting=jQuery.post( firefly_ajax_url, opts );  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Alerts the results *\/ \t\t\t\t\tposting.done( function( response ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tif( response.success ) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( response.data ); \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display='none'; \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-confirm' ).style.display='block';  \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdataLayer.push( { 'event': 'submit-correction' } ); \t\t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t} \t\t<\/script> \t     \t\t\t\t\t\t     \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p style=\"border: 1px solid #f5f5f5; padding: 16px;\">Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/advertise-us\/?wj_source=article\">Advertise Today<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><script>console.log(\"ad slot (BA1)\")<\/script> \t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"ff-fancy-header-container\"> \t\t\t \t<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For those who haven&#8217;t been keeping up with The New York Times and the Democratic Party-likely a significant number of you, which is understandable-you&#8217;re missing some unintentional humor. The left-leaning party is facing a notable issue with men. This concern has become so pronounced that even the hosts of &#8220;The View&#8221; are discussing it. Joy Behar&#8217;s take? Instead of trying to engage these individuals, label them as bigots instead. In case you&#8217;re just tuning in, the lively discussion on ABC revolved around a much-debated article from Thursday titled &#8220;Six Months Later, Democrats Are Still Searching for the Path Forward,&#8221; which highlights how Democrats are still grappling with their image after being told they were out of touch last November, particularly regarding male voters.<\/p>\n<p>A section towards the end of this article has sparked considerable chatter among commentators: Democratic donors and strategists have been convening at upscale hotels to strategize on how to regain working-class support, commissioning projects that resemble anthropological studies about distant communities.<\/p>\n<p>One new initiative worth $20 million aims to address declining Democratic support among young men online. Codenamed SAM-short for &#8220;Speaking with American Men: A Strategic Plan&#8221;-it proposes investments in understanding what language and content resonate in these digital spaces and suggests advertising within video games as part of its strategy. It emphasizes moving away from a moralizing tone.<\/p>\n<p>This approach seems ironic; suggesting that understanding men&#8217;s communication styles requires studying their language while simultaneously planning video game ads feels contradictory. Imagine playing Grand Theft Auto V when suddenly an ad pops up saying something like: &#8220;While guns are fun in games, vote Democrat so we can eliminate the Second Amendment! But don&#8217;t worry; you can still steal things in real life!&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s amusing until you realize &#8220;The View&#8221; genuinely believes they need this funding to learn how to communicate effectively with half of America&#8217;s electorate.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s be honest: aside from occasional sarcastic references to &#8220;conservatives,&#8221; &#8220;The View&#8221; primarily caters to left-leaning women aged 35-75. I often chuckle at seeing ads for Democratic candidates during their segments; what do those campaigns think was airing before? Why duplicate efforts? For instance, during Friday&#8217;s show where they discussed the Times piece alongside an opinion column by David French-which argued that Democrats fail to recognize that movements like the manosphere arise from genuine needs-Behar remarked on air about spending $20 million just for outreach towards men.<\/p>\n<p>Alyssa Farah Griffin-the show&#8217;s designated conservative voice-was one of the few who pointed out how disingenuous it seems for Democrats to spend such money on consultants just to learn how best to speak with certain demographics. After some back-and-forth discussion filled with banter, Behar concluded it was indeed wasteful spending and suggested instead investing resources into teaching men not be sexist-a comment met with applause.<\/p>\n<p>When Griffin countered by stating statistics don&#8217;t support Behar&#8217;s claims about sexism driving voter behavior away from Democrats toward Trump, Behar dismissed her argument as she continued pushing her narrative without considering alternative perspectives or facts presented by Griffin.<\/p>\n<p>In summary, while parts of this conversation received attention due largely because they highlight broader issues within party dynamics-notably between Republicans and Democrats regarding male voters-the underlying problems extend beyond individual candidates or elections themselves<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2442157,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Joy-Behar-5.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[33651],"tags":[36915,55194,36497,14828,32639],"class_list":["post-2442156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-western-journal","tag-gender-issues","tag-masculinity-2","tag-media-critique","tag-sexism","tag-the-view"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Joy-Behar-5.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2442156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2442156"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2442156\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2442160,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2442156\/revisions\/2442160"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2442157"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2442156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2442156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2442156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}