{"id":2441746,"date":"2025-06-02T11:26:02","date_gmt":"2025-06-02T15:26:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/scotus-to-decide-candidates-ability-to-contest-election-laws\/"},"modified":"2025-06-02T11:27:24","modified_gmt":"2025-06-02T15:27:24","slug":"scotus-to-decide-candidates-ability-to-contest-election-laws","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/scotus-to-decide-candidates-ability-to-contest-election-laws\/","title":{"rendered":"SCOTUS To Decide Candidates&#8217; Ability To Contest Election Laws"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">18<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fscotus-to-decide-candidates-ability-to-contest-election-laws%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2441746&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case of **Bost v. Illinois State board of Elections**, which addresses crucial issues regarding federal candidates&#8217; ability to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/doocy-presses-psaki-on-biden-vilifying-republicans-she-ends-response-by-cheering-for-football-team\/\" title=\"Doocy Presses Psaki On Biden Vilifying ..., She Ends Response By Cheering For Football Team\">challenge state election laws<\/a> in court. This case stems from a lawsuit filed in May 2022 by Congressman Mike Bost and two other Republicans against the Illinois State Board of Elections, contesting a law that allowed mail-in ballots to be accepted up to two weeks after Election Day. The lawsuit was dismissed by lower courts due to claims that the challengers lacked standing.<\/p>\n<p>Wiht the Court&#8217;s decision to take up the case, the justices will determine if federal candidates can establish standing to challenge these state regulations, a contentious topic highlighted during previous election litigations, especially surrounding the 2020 presidential election. Judicial Watch, representing the plaintiffs, welcomed this opportunity for clarity, as inconsistent rulings regarding candidate challenges have raised concerns about electoral confidence. No date for oral arguments has been set yet.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<div class=\"article-body body-md bdr-top-black pt-30\">\n<div class=\"row justify-content-center\">\n<div class=\"col-12\">\n<figure class=\"article-thumbnail mb-30 mb-sm-60\">\n<div class=\"article-thumbnail-caption d-flex align-items-center justify-content-md-end label-xs mt-15\">         <i class=\"mdi mdi-camera me-10\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>         <span class=\"visually-hidden\">Image Credit<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Supreme_Court_Justices_make_their_way_to_the_Capitol_Rotunda_to_attend_the_60th_Presidential_Inauguration_at_the_U.S._Capitol.jpg\">Vanessa White\/Department of Defense\/Wikimedia Commons<\/a>       <\/div>\n<\/figure><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"article-share text-center article-share-simple\">\n<h5 class=\"label-sm mb-10\">Share<\/h5>\n<ul class=\"article-share-list list-unstyled m-0 p-0\">\n<li class=\"article-share-facebook m-0\">       <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer\/sharer.php?u=https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2025\/06\/02\/scotus-agrees-to-decide-case-on-candidates-standing-to-challenge-election-laws\/\" target=\"_blank\">         <i class=\"mdi mdi-facebook\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>         <span class=\"visually-hidden\">Share Article on Facebook<\/span>       <\/a>     <\/li>\n<li class=\"article-share-twitter m-0\">       <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=SCOTUS%20Agrees%20To%20Decide%20Case%20On%20Candidates%E2%80%99%20Standing%20To%20Challenge%20Election%20Laws&amp;url=https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2025\/06\/02\/scotus-agrees-to-decide-case-on-candidates-standing-to-challenge-election-laws\/\" target=\"_blank\">         <i class=\"mdi mdi-twitter\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>         <span class=\"visually-hidden\">Share Article on Twitter<\/span>       <\/a>     <\/li>\n<li class=\"article-share-truth-social m-0\">       <a href=\"https:\/\/truthsocial.com\/share?title=SCOTUS%20Agrees%20To%20Decide%20Case%20On%20Candidates%E2%80%99%20Standing%20To%20Challenge%20Election%20Laws&amp;url=https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2025\/06\/02\/scotus-agrees-to-decide-case-on-candidates-standing-to-challenge-election-laws\/\" target=\"_blank\">         <svg xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" fill=\"currentColor\" style=\"width:36px;height:auto;\" viewbox=\"0 0 92 93\"><path d=\"M69.444 55.716H56.772v10.37h12.672zM64.487 37.795V27.32H38.666v38.664h13.18v-28.19zM21.05 27.321h12.653v10.471H21.051z\" https:><\/path><\/svg>         <span class=\"visually-hidden\">Share Article on Truth Social<\/span>       <\/a>     <\/li>\n<li class=\"article-share-link m-0\">       <button data-clipboard-text=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2025\/06\/02\/scotus-agrees-to-decide-case-on-candidates-standing-to-challenge-election-laws\/\" data-tooltip-content=\"Copied!\" class=\"clip tooltip\">         <i class=\"mdi mdi-link-variant\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>         <span class=\"visually-hidden\">Copy Article Link<\/span>       <\/button>     <\/li>\n<li class=\"article-share-email m-0\">       <a href=\"mailto:?subject=SCOTUS%20Agrees%20To%20Decide%20Case%20On%20Candidates%E2%80%99%20Standing%20To%20Challenge%20Election%20Laws&amp;body=%20https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2025\/06\/02\/scotus-agrees-to-decide-case-on-candidates-standing-to-challenge-election-laws\/\" target=\"_blank\">         <i class=\"mdi mdi-email\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>         <span class=\"visually-hidden\">Share Article via Email<\/span>       <\/a>     <\/li>\n<li class=\"article-share-email m-0\"><span class=\"printfriendly pf-button  pf-alignleft\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/thefederalist.com\/#\" rel=\"nofollow\" onclick=\"window.print(); return false;\" title=\"Printer Friendly, PDF &amp; Email\"><span id=\"printfriendly-text2\" class=\"pf-button-text\"><i class=\"mdi mdi-printer\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<p>The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Monday to take up a <a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/3YuVZYV\" >case involving questions surrounding federal candidate litigation<\/a> of state election regulations.<\/p>\n<p>Known as&nbsp;<em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/search.aspx?filename=\/docket\/docketfiles\/html\/public\/24-568.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections<\/a><\/em>, the case offers the nation&rsquo;s highest court with the opportunity to provide a definitive ruling on the issue of whether a federal candidate who has demonstrated substantiated factual allegations has&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.congress.gov\/browse\/essay\/artIII-S2-C1-6-1\/ALDE_00012992\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">standing<\/a>&nbsp;to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/scotus-quietly-weighs-major-case-on-election-challenges\/\" title=\"SCOTUS Quietly Weighs Major ... On Election ...s\">challenge state-enacted election laws<\/a> and rules. As The Federalist previously <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2025\/05\/21\/scotus-quietly-weighs-major-case-on-candidates-standing-to-challenge-election-rules\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">reported<\/a>, &ldquo;Standing has been a contentious issue in election litigation&rdquo; and was at the &ldquo;forefront of several prominent lawsuits filed contesting the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/ideas.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1127&amp;context=dlr\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">2020 presidential election cycle<\/a>, as well as a case involving a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.newsweek.com\/supreme-court-rules-against-republicans-election-case-biden-1965073\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">challenge<\/a>&nbsp;to then-President Biden&rsquo;s &lsquo;<a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/bidenbucks\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Bidenbucks<\/a>&lsquo; executive order.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<div class=\"fdrlst__b89e9-paragraph-2 d-flex justify-content-center\" style=\"margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center; \" id=\"fdrlst__b89e9-1410364543\">\n<div id=\"div-gpt-ad-1463670073398-0\" class=\"mb-30\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>The decision to grant &ldquo;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/wex\/certiorari\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">cert<\/a>&rdquo; in the case means at least four justices <a href=\"https:\/\/www.uscourts.gov\/about-federal-courts\/educational-resources\/about-educational-outreach\/activity-resources\/supreme-court-procedures\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">agreed<\/a>&nbsp;to bring the matter before the full court for consideration, as required by SCOTUS rules. <\/p>\n<p>The origins of the <em>Bost<\/em> case date back to May 2022, when Rep. Mike Bost, R-Ill., and two other Republicans&nbsp;identified as presidential elector nominees filed a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Michael-Bost-et-al.-v-IL-Board-of-Elections-complaint-02754.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">lawsuit<\/a> against the Illinois State Board of Elections and the Board&rsquo;s executive director, Bernadette Matthews. The suit specifically challenged the legality of a state law authorizing the acceptance of voters&rsquo; mail-in ballots up to two weeks after Election Day. <\/p>\n<p>Plaintiffs&rsquo; lawsuit was subsequently dismissed by a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/report-supreme-court-to-decide-on-hearing-suit-declaring-all-male-draft-discriminatory\/\" title=\"Report: ... to Decide on ...ing Suit Declaring All-Male Draft Discriminatory\">federal district court judge<\/a> and the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, both of which claimed challengers lacked standing to bring the case. With nowhere left to go, Bost and his fellow plaintiffs appealed to SCOTUS, asking the high court to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bost-v-IL-Board-of-Elections-Cert-Petition-02754.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">address<\/a> the &ldquo;sole question&rdquo; of whether they, &ldquo;as federal candidates, have pleaded sufficient factual allegations to show Article III standing to challenge state time, place, and manner regulations concerning their federal elections.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>In a statement to The Federalist responding to SCOTUS&rsquo;s decision to hear the case, Judicial Watch&rsquo;s Russ Nobile, who represented plaintiffs in the case, praised the justices for agreeing to clear up &ldquo;a lot of [the] inconsistency over when federal courts are open to hear candidate challenges to election procedures.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;We are very pleased the Supreme Court will hear Congressman Bost&rsquo;s case,&rdquo; Nobile said. &ldquo;Federal courts can&rsquo;t be open to hear some candidates&rsquo; challenges but not for other candidates. It promotes confidence in our elections when federal courts hear (and even reject) challenges to election procedures.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>A date for oral arguments before the high court has not been announced as of publication. <\/p>\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\">\n<div class=\"article-author-description fst-italic\">      Shawn Fleetwood is a staff writer for The Federalist and a graduate of the University of Mary Washington. He previously served as a state content writer for Convention of States Action and his work has been featured in numerous outlets, including RealClearPolitics, RealClearHealth, and Conservative Review. Follow him on Twitter @ShawnFleetwood<\/div>\n<div class=\"article-author mt-30 mt-sm-60 pt-30 bdr-top-bold-black\">\n<div class=\"row g-0 align-items-center\">\n<div class=\"col-12 col-md-6\">\n<div class=\"article-author-profile d-flex align-items-center justify-content-center justify-content-md-start\">\n<div class=\"article-author-details\">\n<div class=\"label-md\">Shawn Fleetwood<\/div>\n<div class=\"article-author-twitter label-sm d-flex align-items-center mt-10\">             <i class=\"mdi mdi-twitter me-5\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>             <span class=\"visually-hidden\">Visit on Twitter<\/span>            <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ShawnFleetwood\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"text-decoration-none\">@ShawnFleetwood<\/a>           <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"col-12 col-md-6 d-flex justify-content-center justify-content-md-end mt-15 mt-md-0\">        <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/author\/shawnfleetwood\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">More Articles<\/a>     <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"article-tags bdr-top-black mt-30 mt-sm-60 pt-15 pt-md-45\">\n<ul class=\"list-unstyled d-flex flex-wrap align-items-center mb-0 mx-n10 p-0\">\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/bost-v-illinois-state-board-of-elections\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/candidate-standing\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">candidate standing<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/election-laws\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">election laws<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/elections\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">Elections<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/judicial-watch\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">Judicial Watch<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/lawsuits\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">lawsuits<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/russ-nobile\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">Russ Nobile<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/scotus\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">SCOTUS<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/supreme-court\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">Supreme Court<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The U.S. Supreme Court will hear the case Bost v. Illinois, addressing federal candidates&#8217; ability to challenge state election laws<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":539,"featured_media":2441747,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Supreme-Court.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[7064,38778,32546,6994,56369],"class_list":["post-2441746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-candidates","tag-election-laws","tag-legal-decision","tag-scotus","tag-us-supreme-court"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Supreme-Court.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2441746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/539"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2441746"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2441746\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2441750,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2441746\/revisions\/2441750"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2441747"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2441746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2441746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2441746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}